Sumac-Marinated Beef (Longissimus thoracis et lumborum): Bioaccessibility of Hydroxymethylfurfural, Protein, and Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity After In Vitro Digestion

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Ogeday Sümer,  and , Sedef Nehir El*, 
{"title":"Sumac-Marinated Beef (Longissimus thoracis et lumborum): Bioaccessibility of Hydroxymethylfurfural, Protein, and Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity After In Vitro Digestion","authors":"Ogeday Sümer,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Sedef Nehir El*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0064410.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we applied sumac sauce (SS) for the marination of beef (<i>Longissimus thoracis et lumborum</i>, LTL) using syringe and immersion methods and investigated sumac marination on cooking properties and effects on the bioaccessibility of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), protein, and phenolic compounds as well as antioxidant capacity after in vitro digestion. The highest absorption level of the marinade sauce was observed for the control sauce (CS) and SS samples prepared by using the syringe method. The water-holding capacity (WHC) of unmarinated cooked beef (B) was 26.8 ± 0.18%, whereas the WHC values of the beef samples (CSI and CSS) marinated with CS using the immersion and syringe methods were 30.8 ± 0.08 and 33 ± 0.24%, respectively. The highest WHC 37.3% was observed for the beef samples marinated with SS via immersion (SSI; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The lowest and highest hardnesses and chewinesses were observed for SSI and B, respectively. The highest total phenolic compound content after in vitro digestion was measured in SSI (454.55 mg GAE/g), whereas the lowest content was determined in B, with a similar value before digestion (19.84 mg GAE/g). Comparing the samples prepared via different marination techniques, the highest and lowest antioxidant activities were determined for SSI and B, respectively. Notably, the protein digestibility in B was higher than that in all of the marinated samples. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed in the HMF concentrations before digestion, except for CSS. In contrast, after in vitro digestion, the HMF concentration significantly increased in all samples. In our study, it was found that marinating meat with sumac-containing sauce increased water retention capacity and improved textural properties of meat and increased bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds but decreased protein digestibility under simulated digestion conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":"4 12","pages":"3067–3075 3067–3075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we applied sumac sauce (SS) for the marination of beef (Longissimus thoracis et lumborum, LTL) using syringe and immersion methods and investigated sumac marination on cooking properties and effects on the bioaccessibility of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), protein, and phenolic compounds as well as antioxidant capacity after in vitro digestion. The highest absorption level of the marinade sauce was observed for the control sauce (CS) and SS samples prepared by using the syringe method. The water-holding capacity (WHC) of unmarinated cooked beef (B) was 26.8 ± 0.18%, whereas the WHC values of the beef samples (CSI and CSS) marinated with CS using the immersion and syringe methods were 30.8 ± 0.08 and 33 ± 0.24%, respectively. The highest WHC 37.3% was observed for the beef samples marinated with SS via immersion (SSI; P < 0.05). The lowest and highest hardnesses and chewinesses were observed for SSI and B, respectively. The highest total phenolic compound content after in vitro digestion was measured in SSI (454.55 mg GAE/g), whereas the lowest content was determined in B, with a similar value before digestion (19.84 mg GAE/g). Comparing the samples prepared via different marination techniques, the highest and lowest antioxidant activities were determined for SSI and B, respectively. Notably, the protein digestibility in B was higher than that in all of the marinated samples. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed in the HMF concentrations before digestion, except for CSS. In contrast, after in vitro digestion, the HMF concentration significantly increased in all samples. In our study, it was found that marinating meat with sumac-containing sauce increased water retention capacity and improved textural properties of meat and increased bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds but decreased protein digestibility under simulated digestion conditions.

Abstract Image

漆树腌制牛肉(胸腰最长肌):体外消化后羟甲基糠醛、蛋白质和酚类化合物的生物可及性和抗氧化能力
本研究以漆树酱(SS)为原料,采用注射器和浸泡法制备牛肉(Longissimus胸腰肉,LTL),研究漆树酱的蒸煮特性以及对5-羟甲基糠醛(HMF)、蛋白质和酚类化合物的生物可及性以及体外消化后抗氧化能力的影响。用注射器法制备的对照酱汁(CS)和SS样品的吸光度最高。未腌制熟牛肉(B)的持水能力(WHC)为26.8±0.18%,而用浸渍法和注射器腌制的牛肉(CSI和CSS)的持水能力(WHC)分别为30.8±0.08和33±0.24%。用SS浸泡的牛肉样品WHC最高,为37.3% (SSI;P & lt;0.05)。SSI和B的硬度和咀嚼力分别最低和最高。体外消化后总酚类化合物含量最高的是SSI (454.55 mg GAE/g),而体外消化前总酚类化合物含量最低的是B (19.84 mg GAE/g)。比较不同腌制工艺制备的样品,SSI和B的抗氧化活性分别最高和最低。值得注意的是,B的蛋白质消化率高于所有腌制样品。此外,除CSS外,消化前HMF浓度无统计学差异。相反,体外消化后,所有样品的HMF浓度均显著升高。本研究发现,在模拟消化条件下,用含漆树酱腌制肉类增加了肉的保水能力,改善了肉的质地,提高了酚类化合物的生物可及性,但降低了蛋白质的消化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信