Gretchen Seif, Alan M Phipps, Joseph Donnelly, Blair H S Dellenbach, Aiko K Thompson
{"title":"Neurophysiological Effects of Latent Trigger Point Dry Needling on Spinal Reflexes.","authors":"Gretchen Seif, Alan M Phipps, Joseph Donnelly, Blair H S Dellenbach, Aiko K Thompson","doi":"10.1152/jn.00366.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep dry needling (DDN) is a method to treat muscle trigger points (TrPs) often found in persons with neuromuscular pain and spasticity. Currently, its neurophysiological actions are not well established. Thus, to understand how DDN affects spinal cord physiology, we investigated the effects of TrP DDN on spinal reflexes. In 17 adults with latent TrPs in the medial gastrocnemius (MG) without known neurological or orthopedic injuries, the H-reflex, M-wave, and reciprocal inhibition in the soleus, MG and lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and passive ankle range of motion (ROM) were measured before and immediately after, 90 minutes, and 72 hours after a single bout of DDN at the MG TrPs. The MG maximum M-wave (M<sub>max</sub>) amplitude was decreased at immediately and 90 minutes post DDN (by -14 and -18%) and returned to pre DDN level at 72 hours post. LG and soleus M<sub>max</sub> did not change. The maximum H-reflex (H<sub>max</sub>) amplitude did not change in any of the triceps surae. Soleus inhibition was increased significantly at immediately (+30%) and 72 hours post DDN (+36%). ROM was increased by ≈4 deg immediately and ≈3 deg at 72 hours post DDN. Temporary reduction of MG (but not soleus or LG) M<sub>max</sub> amplitude after DDN and its recovery at 72hours post indicates temporary and specific effects of DDN in the treated muscle. The immediate and 72 hours post increases in the ROM and soleus inhibition with no changes in H<sub>max</sub> suggest complex effects of DDN at the spinal level.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00366.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep dry needling (DDN) is a method to treat muscle trigger points (TrPs) often found in persons with neuromuscular pain and spasticity. Currently, its neurophysiological actions are not well established. Thus, to understand how DDN affects spinal cord physiology, we investigated the effects of TrP DDN on spinal reflexes. In 17 adults with latent TrPs in the medial gastrocnemius (MG) without known neurological or orthopedic injuries, the H-reflex, M-wave, and reciprocal inhibition in the soleus, MG and lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and passive ankle range of motion (ROM) were measured before and immediately after, 90 minutes, and 72 hours after a single bout of DDN at the MG TrPs. The MG maximum M-wave (Mmax) amplitude was decreased at immediately and 90 minutes post DDN (by -14 and -18%) and returned to pre DDN level at 72 hours post. LG and soleus Mmax did not change. The maximum H-reflex (Hmax) amplitude did not change in any of the triceps surae. Soleus inhibition was increased significantly at immediately (+30%) and 72 hours post DDN (+36%). ROM was increased by ≈4 deg immediately and ≈3 deg at 72 hours post DDN. Temporary reduction of MG (but not soleus or LG) Mmax amplitude after DDN and its recovery at 72hours post indicates temporary and specific effects of DDN in the treated muscle. The immediate and 72 hours post increases in the ROM and soleus inhibition with no changes in Hmax suggest complex effects of DDN at the spinal level.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.