Study on the Mechanism of Rock Brazilian Disk Splitting Based on the Constitutive Model With Different Tensile and Compressive Moduli

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Complexity Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1155/cplx/4790930
Liu Pengcheng, Xing Minglu, Chen Shiwei, Zhang Yubao, Li Longfei
{"title":"Study on the Mechanism of Rock Brazilian Disk Splitting Based on the Constitutive Model With Different Tensile and Compressive Moduli","authors":"Liu Pengcheng,&nbsp;Xing Minglu,&nbsp;Chen Shiwei,&nbsp;Zhang Yubao,&nbsp;Li Longfei","doi":"10.1155/cplx/4790930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Due to the significant tension–compression asymmetry of rocks, the disparity between the results of Brazilian splitting tests and those derived from the linear elastic constitutive theory has been a topic of extensive discussion. In order to delve into the stress–strain field evolution and crack propagation process of Brazilian splitting tests under tension–compression varying modulus constitutive models, finite element software was employed. By means of self-developed subroutines, a method was employed to control the rock’s tension and compression with different modulus. Comparative analysis was conducted to scrutinize the distinctions between linear elastic constitutive models and variational modulus constitutive models. The results elucidate that under the variational modulus constitutive model: (1) Stress concentration in the <i>x</i>-direction does not occur at the center of the rock but is offset toward the two sides of the rock loading end, with stress peaks similar to linear elasticity; (2) under the variable modulus constitutive model, shear effects are pronounced at both ends of the rock loading axis, and initial cracks in the rock originate near the two sides of the loading end, forming initial cracks of tensile-shear mixed mode; and (3) due to the influence of shear stresses at both ends of the rock loading, the ultimate load of the rock is lower than that of a linear elastic structure, and the calculated tensile strength is lower than the true strength of the rock.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/cplx/4790930","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/cplx/4790930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the significant tension–compression asymmetry of rocks, the disparity between the results of Brazilian splitting tests and those derived from the linear elastic constitutive theory has been a topic of extensive discussion. In order to delve into the stress–strain field evolution and crack propagation process of Brazilian splitting tests under tension–compression varying modulus constitutive models, finite element software was employed. By means of self-developed subroutines, a method was employed to control the rock’s tension and compression with different modulus. Comparative analysis was conducted to scrutinize the distinctions between linear elastic constitutive models and variational modulus constitutive models. The results elucidate that under the variational modulus constitutive model: (1) Stress concentration in the x-direction does not occur at the center of the rock but is offset toward the two sides of the rock loading end, with stress peaks similar to linear elasticity; (2) under the variable modulus constitutive model, shear effects are pronounced at both ends of the rock loading axis, and initial cracks in the rock originate near the two sides of the loading end, forming initial cracks of tensile-shear mixed mode; and (3) due to the influence of shear stresses at both ends of the rock loading, the ultimate load of the rock is lower than that of a linear elastic structure, and the calculated tensile strength is lower than the true strength of the rock.

Abstract Image

由于岩石具有明显的拉压非对称性,巴西劈裂试验结果与线性弹性构造理论推导结果之间的差异一直是广泛讨论的话题。为了深入研究巴西劈裂试验在拉伸-压缩不同模量构成模型下的应力-应变场演变和裂缝扩展过程,我们采用了有限元软件。通过自主开发的子程序,采用不同模量控制岩石的拉伸和压缩。通过对比分析,仔细研究了线性弹性构造模型和变模量构造模型之间的区别。结果表明,在变模量构造模型下(1) x 方向的应力集中不发生在岩石中心,而是向岩石加载端两侧偏移,应力峰值与线弹性相似;(2) 在变模量构成模型下,岩石加载轴两端的剪切效应明显,岩石的初始裂缝起源于加载端两侧附近,形成拉剪混合模式的初始裂缝;(3) 由于岩石加载两端的剪应力影响,岩石的极限荷载低于线弹性结构的极限荷载,计算的抗拉强度低于岩石的真实强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信