A survey on deep learning-based automated essay scoring and feedback generation

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Haile Misgna, Byung-Won On, Ingyu Lee, Gyu Sang Choi
{"title":"A survey on deep learning-based automated essay scoring and feedback generation","authors":"Haile Misgna,&nbsp;Byung-Won On,&nbsp;Ingyu Lee,&nbsp;Gyu Sang Choi","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-11017-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep learning-based automated essay scoring (AES) models exhibit a remarkable ability to identify complex patterns within essays and then generate accurate score predictions in an end-to-end training fashion. However, these models face a critical limitation in explaining the specific patterns and features utilized for scoring, which are essential for interpreting the scores and offering constructive feedback to essay authors. Numerous studies have focused on essay scoring, with the aim of modeling prompt-specific, domain-adaptable, or trait-specific AES. While existing surveys on AES cover topics ranging from representation to scoring models, they primarily emphasize scoring models. This study addresses a crucial gap by encompassing research on feedback generation for essay assessment tasks. By delving into essay scoring and feedback generation, we synthesize several existing literature to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of ongoing research in both deep learning-based essay scoring and automated feedback generation. We categorized the existing essay scoring studies into prompt-specific and cross-prompt AES models, noting that prompt-specific AES is extensively researched category. However, we have only come across a few studies concerning automated feedback generation, likely because of the limited availability of suitable datasets for researching such types of tasks. Moreover, this survey provides insights into approaches for essay representation, prevalent datasets, evaluation metrics, and challenges in automated essay scoring tasks. By shedding light on these aspects, our goal is to delineate the current landscape, identify key research directions, and pave the way for further advancements in automated essay assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-11017-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-11017-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning-based automated essay scoring (AES) models exhibit a remarkable ability to identify complex patterns within essays and then generate accurate score predictions in an end-to-end training fashion. However, these models face a critical limitation in explaining the specific patterns and features utilized for scoring, which are essential for interpreting the scores and offering constructive feedback to essay authors. Numerous studies have focused on essay scoring, with the aim of modeling prompt-specific, domain-adaptable, or trait-specific AES. While existing surveys on AES cover topics ranging from representation to scoring models, they primarily emphasize scoring models. This study addresses a crucial gap by encompassing research on feedback generation for essay assessment tasks. By delving into essay scoring and feedback generation, we synthesize several existing literature to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of ongoing research in both deep learning-based essay scoring and automated feedback generation. We categorized the existing essay scoring studies into prompt-specific and cross-prompt AES models, noting that prompt-specific AES is extensively researched category. However, we have only come across a few studies concerning automated feedback generation, likely because of the limited availability of suitable datasets for researching such types of tasks. Moreover, this survey provides insights into approaches for essay representation, prevalent datasets, evaluation metrics, and challenges in automated essay scoring tasks. By shedding light on these aspects, our goal is to delineate the current landscape, identify key research directions, and pave the way for further advancements in automated essay assessment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信