Field study on pressure differential mechanisms under static and dynamic disturbances in non-isobaric building zones

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yufan Chang, Zhengtao Ai, Jie Zong, Zhongbing Liu, Weichao Zhang
{"title":"Field study on pressure differential mechanisms under static and dynamic disturbances in non-isobaric building zones","authors":"Yufan Chang, Zhengtao Ai, Jie Zong, Zhongbing Liu, Weichao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deviation of pressure differential from design under static conditions and delayed convergency of pressure fluctuation after dynamic disturbances are widely reported problems associated with pressure differential control in non-isobaric buildings. This study performed field measurements to investigate the pressure differential mechanisms under static and dynamic disturbance in several non-isobaric pharmaceutical factory zones served by either constant air volume or variable air volume (VAV) ventilation systems. Four typical dynamic disturbances including door motion (the process of door opening or closing for 1 s, 2 s, and 3 s), personnel entry and exit, indoor personnel movement, and continuous door opening were considered. The results showed that static pressure differentials deviated significantly from the design requirements, and some of the pressure differentials were even reversed in direction. Depending on the location of the sensor, it took 3–13 s and 3–10 s to detect and stabilize the pressure differential within the zone during door openings and door closings, respectively. Personnel entry and exit induced inevitable brief but intense disturbances in the pressure differential evolution. Ceiling-mounted pressure sensors could not detect fluctuations caused by indoor personnel movement, thus preventing erroneous responses from proportional-integral-derivative (PID)-based VAV valves. However, the VAV valve exhibited slow response and ineffectiveness during door motion and continuous door opening due to unsuitable PID parameters and low-accuracy pressure sensors. To improve the control strategy, exponential models based on the pressure differential evolution during door motion were proposed. The findings provide useful information for real-time and accurate pressure differential monitoring and for developing effective VAV ventilation strategies.","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deviation of pressure differential from design under static conditions and delayed convergency of pressure fluctuation after dynamic disturbances are widely reported problems associated with pressure differential control in non-isobaric buildings. This study performed field measurements to investigate the pressure differential mechanisms under static and dynamic disturbance in several non-isobaric pharmaceutical factory zones served by either constant air volume or variable air volume (VAV) ventilation systems. Four typical dynamic disturbances including door motion (the process of door opening or closing for 1 s, 2 s, and 3 s), personnel entry and exit, indoor personnel movement, and continuous door opening were considered. The results showed that static pressure differentials deviated significantly from the design requirements, and some of the pressure differentials were even reversed in direction. Depending on the location of the sensor, it took 3–13 s and 3–10 s to detect and stabilize the pressure differential within the zone during door openings and door closings, respectively. Personnel entry and exit induced inevitable brief but intense disturbances in the pressure differential evolution. Ceiling-mounted pressure sensors could not detect fluctuations caused by indoor personnel movement, thus preventing erroneous responses from proportional-integral-derivative (PID)-based VAV valves. However, the VAV valve exhibited slow response and ineffectiveness during door motion and continuous door opening due to unsuitable PID parameters and low-accuracy pressure sensors. To improve the control strategy, exponential models based on the pressure differential evolution during door motion were proposed. The findings provide useful information for real-time and accurate pressure differential monitoring and for developing effective VAV ventilation strategies.
静态条件下的压差偏离设计以及动态扰动后的压差波动延迟收敛是广泛报道的与非等压建筑压差控制相关的问题。本研究进行了实地测量,以调查几个由恒定风量或可变风量 (VAV) 通风系统提供服务的非等压制药厂区域在静态和动态干扰下的压差机制。研究考虑了四种典型的动态扰动,包括门运动(门打开或关闭 1 秒、2 秒和 3 秒的过程)、人员进出、室内人员移动和连续开门。结果表明,静态压差与设计要求有很大偏差,有些压差甚至方向相反。根据传感器的位置,在门打开和门关闭时,分别需要 3-13 秒和 3-10 秒才能检测到并稳定区域内的压差。人员进出不可避免地会对压差变化造成短暂而强烈的干扰。安装在天花板上的压力传感器无法检测到室内人员移动造成的波动,从而避免了基于比例-积分-派生(PID)的 VAV 阀做出错误响应。然而,由于不合适的 PID 参数和低精度的压力传感器,VAV 阀门在门移动和连续开门时表现出响应缓慢和无效。为了改进控制策略,提出了基于门运动过程中压差演变的指数模型。研究结果为实时和精确的压差监测以及制定有效的 VAV 通风策略提供了有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信