Pectoralis I and Serratus Anterior Plane Block Analgesia for Bilateral Mastectomy: A Case Series.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Kinjal M Patel, Kiana D de Guzman, Keri Cronin, Noud van Helmond, Sandeep Krishnan, Ludmil Mitrev, Keyur C Trivedi, Ronak G Desai
{"title":"Pectoralis I and Serratus Anterior Plane Block Analgesia for Bilateral Mastectomy: A Case Series.","authors":"Kinjal M Patel, Kiana D de Guzman, Keri Cronin, Noud van Helmond, Sandeep Krishnan, Ludmil Mitrev, Keyur C Trivedi, Ronak G Desai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poorly controlled acute breast surgery postoperative pain is associated with delayed recovery, increased morbidity, impaired quality of life, and prolonged opioid use during and after hospitalization. Recently, ultrasound-guided pectoralis nerve (PECS) I block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block, together or individually, have emerged as a potential method to relieve pain, decrease opioid requirements, and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess if the addition of a PECS I/SAP block in patients undergoing bilateral mastectomies provides more effective perioperative analgesia compared to standard analgesia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, different approaches to analgesia by anesthesiologists at our institution provided an opportunity to compare patients who received a PECS I/SAP block to patients who received standard peri- and postoperative pain control from May 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020. Adult women who had bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction with tissue expanders for breast cancer were included. Bilateral PECS I/SAP blocks were performed with 60 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine. The standard analgesia group had a balanced general anesthetic with volatile anesthetic, opioids (fentanyl or hydromorphone), and muscle relaxant. The postoperative analgesic regimen was similar in both groups. Pain scores (Numeric rating Scale) and opioid consumption (converted to oral morphine milligram equivalent [MME]) intraoperatively, and on postop day (POD) 0 up to POD 3 were collected. Length of stay data were collected as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were included (n = 17 PECS I/SAP block; n = 23 standard analgesia). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups; most patients in the PECS I/SAP block (93%) and standard analgesia (96%) groups were discharged on POD 1 or 2. Intra-operative opioid requirements were lower in the PECS I/SAP block vs the standard analgesia group (median 56 MME, interquartile range [IQR] 44-62 vs median 65 MME, IQR 63-83, respectively, P = 0.002). Opioid requirements were similar in the block group compared to the standard analgesia group from POD 0 to POD 2. Pain scores from POD 0 to POD2, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay were also similar between the PECS I/SAP block and standard analgesia group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The retrospective nature of this study and its reliance on medical records are limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PECS I/SAP block may potentially reduce pain in patients having breast surgery for cancer by providing analgesia to the lateral and anterior chest wall. While this analysis showed a reduction in intraoperative opioid consumption, no significant postoperative benefit in either pain scores, opioid consumption, or length of stay was observed. This may be in part due to the PECS I/SAP block not providing adequate analgesia to the medial portion of the breast.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 10","pages":"E1117-E1122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poorly controlled acute breast surgery postoperative pain is associated with delayed recovery, increased morbidity, impaired quality of life, and prolonged opioid use during and after hospitalization. Recently, ultrasound-guided pectoralis nerve (PECS) I block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block, together or individually, have emerged as a potential method to relieve pain, decrease opioid requirements, and improve patient outcomes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess if the addition of a PECS I/SAP block in patients undergoing bilateral mastectomies provides more effective perioperative analgesia compared to standard analgesia.

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary academic medical center.

Methods: For patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, different approaches to analgesia by anesthesiologists at our institution provided an opportunity to compare patients who received a PECS I/SAP block to patients who received standard peri- and postoperative pain control from May 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020. Adult women who had bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction with tissue expanders for breast cancer were included. Bilateral PECS I/SAP blocks were performed with 60 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine. The standard analgesia group had a balanced general anesthetic with volatile anesthetic, opioids (fentanyl or hydromorphone), and muscle relaxant. The postoperative analgesic regimen was similar in both groups. Pain scores (Numeric rating Scale) and opioid consumption (converted to oral morphine milligram equivalent [MME]) intraoperatively, and on postop day (POD) 0 up to POD 3 were collected. Length of stay data were collected as a secondary outcome.

Results: Forty patients were included (n = 17 PECS I/SAP block; n = 23 standard analgesia). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups; most patients in the PECS I/SAP block (93%) and standard analgesia (96%) groups were discharged on POD 1 or 2. Intra-operative opioid requirements were lower in the PECS I/SAP block vs the standard analgesia group (median 56 MME, interquartile range [IQR] 44-62 vs median 65 MME, IQR 63-83, respectively, P = 0.002). Opioid requirements were similar in the block group compared to the standard analgesia group from POD 0 to POD 2. Pain scores from POD 0 to POD2, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay were also similar between the PECS I/SAP block and standard analgesia group.

Limitations: The retrospective nature of this study and its reliance on medical records are limitations.

Conclusion: The PECS I/SAP block may potentially reduce pain in patients having breast surgery for cancer by providing analgesia to the lateral and anterior chest wall. While this analysis showed a reduction in intraoperative opioid consumption, no significant postoperative benefit in either pain scores, opioid consumption, or length of stay was observed. This may be in part due to the PECS I/SAP block not providing adequate analgesia to the medial portion of the breast.

双侧乳房切除术中胸I肌和锯肌前平面阻滞镇痛:一个病例系列。
背景:控制不良的急性乳房手术术后疼痛与住院期间和住院后恢复延迟、发病率增加、生活质量下降和阿片类药物使用延长有关。最近,超声引导胸肌神经(PECS) I阻滞和前锯肌(SAP)阻滞,一起或单独,已成为一种潜在的方法来缓解疼痛,减少阿片类药物的需求,并改善患者的预后。目的:本研究的目的是评估在双侧乳房切除术患者中添加PECS I/SAP阻滞是否比标准镇痛提供更有效的围手术期镇痛。研究设计:回顾性病例系列。环境:三级学术医疗中心。方法:在2019年5月1日至2020年11月30日期间,对于接受乳腺癌手术的患者,我们机构的麻醉师采用不同的镇痛方法,为接受PECS I/SAP阻滞的患者与接受标准围手术期和术后疼痛控制的患者提供了比较的机会。研究对象包括接受双侧乳房切除术和乳房组织扩张器重建的成年女性。用60 mL 0.25%布比卡因和266 mg布比卡因脂质体进行双侧PECS I/SAP阻滞。标准镇痛组采用挥发性麻醉剂、阿片类药物(芬太尼或氢吗啡酮)和肌肉松弛剂平衡全麻。两组术后镇痛方案相似。收集术中疼痛评分(数值评定量表)和阿片类药物消耗(转换为口服吗啡毫克当量[MME]),以及术后第0至第3天(POD)。住院时间数据作为次要结果收集。结果:纳入40例患者(n = 17例PECS I/SAP阻滞;N = 23,标准镇痛)。各组间基线特征相似;大多数PECS I/SAP阻滞组(93%)和标准镇痛组(96%)患者在POD 1或2时出院。与标准镇痛组相比,PECS I/SAP阻断组术中阿片类药物需求较低(中位56 MME,四分位数范围[IQR] 44-62 vs中位65 MME, IQR 63-83, P = 0.002)。从POD 0到POD 2,阻滞组的阿片类药物需求与标准镇痛组相似。从POD 0到POD2的疼痛评分、麻醉后护理单位住院时间和住院时间在PECS I/SAP阻滞组和标准镇痛组之间也相似。局限性:本研究的回顾性研究及其对医疗记录的依赖存在局限性。结论:PECS I/SAP阻滞可能通过向胸壁外侧和前壁提供镇痛来潜在地减轻乳腺癌手术患者的疼痛。虽然该分析显示术中阿片类药物消耗减少,但在疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗或住院时间方面均未观察到术后明显的益处。这可能部分是由于PECS I/SAP阻滞不能对乳房内侧部分提供足够的镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信