Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block, Paravertebral Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Pelvi-ureteric Surgeries: A Randomized Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Amir Abouzkry Elsayed, Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Sherif Kamal Arafa
{"title":"Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block, Paravertebral Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Pelvi-ureteric Surgeries: A Randomized Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.","authors":"Amir Abouzkry Elsayed, Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Sherif Kamal Arafa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective postoperative analgesia enhances the patient's comfort and facilitates early mobilization and recovery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for pelvi-ureteric surgeries. The primary outcome measure in the study was the total morphine consumption during the first 48 hours following the operation. The secondary outcomes included the levels of postoperative pain, the time of first rescue analgesia, and the satisfaction of patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized double-blind noninferiority trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kafr Elsheikh University Hospitals, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial was performed on 90 patients between the ages of 21 and 65, men and women, who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II and were undergoing elective pelvi-ureteric surgeries. Patients were assigned equally to the TPVB, QLB, and ESPB groups. Before the induction of general anesthesia, blocks were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The numeric rating scale (NRS) score was measured in the post-anesthesia care unit at one, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. If the NRS score was ≥ 4, the patient received 3 mg of intravenous morphine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time of the performing block was shorter in the ESPB group than in the TPVB or QLB group (P < 0.001), but the TPVB and QLB groups were comparable. The intraoperative consumption of fentanyl and total consumption of morphine at 24 and then 48 hours postoperatively were comparable among the 3 groups, as were the satisfaction of the patient, NRS scores, time of first rescue analgesia, and complications (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A relatively small sample size, a single-center setting, and the absence of a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In pelvi-ureteric surgeries, the ESPB, TPVB, and QLB provided comparable intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications, but the ESPB was performed more quickly. Therefore, we recommend the ESPB as a routine regional anesthetic technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 10","pages":"E1055-E1063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective postoperative analgesia enhances the patient's comfort and facilitates early mobilization and recovery.

Objective: This study compared the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for pelvi-ureteric surgeries. The primary outcome measure in the study was the total morphine consumption during the first 48 hours following the operation. The secondary outcomes included the levels of postoperative pain, the time of first rescue analgesia, and the satisfaction of patients.

Study design: Randomized double-blind noninferiority trial.

Setting: Kafr Elsheikh University Hospitals, Egypt.

Methods: This trial was performed on 90 patients between the ages of 21 and 65, men and women, who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II and were undergoing elective pelvi-ureteric surgeries. Patients were assigned equally to the TPVB, QLB, and ESPB groups. Before the induction of general anesthesia, blocks were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The numeric rating scale (NRS) score was measured in the post-anesthesia care unit at one, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. If the NRS score was ≥ 4, the patient received 3 mg of intravenous morphine.

Results: The time of the performing block was shorter in the ESPB group than in the TPVB or QLB group (P < 0.001), but the TPVB and QLB groups were comparable. The intraoperative consumption of fentanyl and total consumption of morphine at 24 and then 48 hours postoperatively were comparable among the 3 groups, as were the satisfaction of the patient, NRS scores, time of first rescue analgesia, and complications (P > 0.05).

Limitations: A relatively small sample size, a single-center setting, and the absence of a control group.

Conclusions: In pelvi-ureteric surgeries, the ESPB, TPVB, and QLB provided comparable intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications, but the ESPB was performed more quickly. Therefore, we recommend the ESPB as a routine regional anesthetic technique.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信