Individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual working memory: Evidence from a change detection task.

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Yin-Ting Lin, Andrew B Leber
{"title":"Individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual working memory: Evidence from a change detection task.","authors":"Yin-Ting Lin, Andrew B Leber","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive research has shown that differences in cognitive ability predict working memory (WM) performance. However, strategy use may also explain individual differences in WM. Here we explored individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual WM. Participants searched for a target that changed between two alternating displays that cycled until response. Critically, participants could freely choose between one red and one blue target, and the ratio of red to blue items varied randomly across trials. Therefore, the optimal strategy was to selectively encode items in the smaller color subset. Results showed a general tendency to choose the optimal (small subset) target, but there were large individual differences in strategy choice, with many participants using suboptimal strategies. While Experiment 1 found no relationship between ability and strategy, a larger sample replication in Experiment 5 found a small, positive correlation between WM ability and strategy optimization. Experiment 2 showed that strategy use was not stable over time. Many participants spontaneously shifted to highly optimal target choices, suggesting a sudden discovery of the optimal strategy. Experiment 3 confirmed the importance of explicit knowledge in strategy choice. Informing participants about the optimal strategy induced a large strategy improvement. Moreover, optimally performing participants demonstrated explicit awareness of the optimal strategy. Experiment 4 showed that, even under greater task demands, when participants viewed the displays only once, strategy use was still suboptimal. Our findings highlight strategy choice as an important source of individual variation and therefore should be considered alongside the ability to fully understand differences in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive research has shown that differences in cognitive ability predict working memory (WM) performance. However, strategy use may also explain individual differences in WM. Here we explored individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual WM. Participants searched for a target that changed between two alternating displays that cycled until response. Critically, participants could freely choose between one red and one blue target, and the ratio of red to blue items varied randomly across trials. Therefore, the optimal strategy was to selectively encode items in the smaller color subset. Results showed a general tendency to choose the optimal (small subset) target, but there were large individual differences in strategy choice, with many participants using suboptimal strategies. While Experiment 1 found no relationship between ability and strategy, a larger sample replication in Experiment 5 found a small, positive correlation between WM ability and strategy optimization. Experiment 2 showed that strategy use was not stable over time. Many participants spontaneously shifted to highly optimal target choices, suggesting a sudden discovery of the optimal strategy. Experiment 3 confirmed the importance of explicit knowledge in strategy choice. Informing participants about the optimal strategy induced a large strategy improvement. Moreover, optimally performing participants demonstrated explicit awareness of the optimal strategy. Experiment 4 showed that, even under greater task demands, when participants viewed the displays only once, strategy use was still suboptimal. Our findings highlight strategy choice as an important source of individual variation and therefore should be considered alongside the ability to fully understand differences in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

视觉工作记忆中编码策略优化的个体差异:来自变化检测任务的证据
大量研究表明,认知能力的差异可以预测工作记忆(WM)的表现。然而,策略使用也可以解释WM的个体差异。本研究探讨了视觉WM编码策略优化的个体差异。参与者搜索的目标在两个交替的显示之间变化,直到回应。关键是,参与者可以在一个红色和一个蓝色目标之间自由选择,而红色和蓝色项目的比例在试验中随机变化。因此,最优策略是在较小的颜色子集中选择性地编码项目。结果显示,参与者普遍倾向于选择最优(小子集)目标,但在策略选择上存在较大的个体差异,许多参与者使用次优策略。实验1没有发现能力与策略之间的关系,而在实验5中更大的样本复制发现WM能力与策略优化之间存在较小的正相关关系。实验2表明,策略使用不随时间的推移而稳定。许多参与者自发地转向高度最优的目标选择,这表明他们突然发现了最优策略。实验3证实了外显知识在策略选择中的重要性。将最优策略告知参与者,会导致策略的大幅改进。此外,表现最优的参与者表现出对最优策略的外显意识。实验4表明,即使在更大的任务要求下,当参与者只看一次显示器时,策略使用仍然是次优的。我们的研究结果强调了策略选择是个体差异的重要来源,因此应该与充分理解WM差异的能力一起考虑。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信