The population based cognitive testing in subjects with SARS-CoV-2 (POPCOV2) study: longitudinal investigation of remote cognitive and fatigue screening in PCR-positive cases and negative controls.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468204
Alina von Etzdorf, Maja Harzen, Hannah Heinrichs, Henning Seifert, Stefan J Groiß, Carolin Balloff, Torsten Feldt, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Tom Lüdde, Michael Bernhard, Alfons Schnitzler, Klaus Goebels, Jörg Kraus, Sven G Meuth, Saskia Elben, Philipp Albrecht
{"title":"The population based cognitive testing in subjects with SARS-CoV-2 (POPCOV2) study: longitudinal investigation of remote cognitive and fatigue screening in PCR-positive cases and negative controls.","authors":"Alina von Etzdorf, Maja Harzen, Hannah Heinrichs, Henning Seifert, Stefan J Groiß, Carolin Balloff, Torsten Feldt, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Tom Lüdde, Michael Bernhard, Alfons Schnitzler, Klaus Goebels, Jörg Kraus, Sven G Meuth, Saskia Elben, Philipp Albrecht","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) only show mild respiratory symptoms. However, some patients with SARS-CoV-2 display neurological symptoms. Data on the exact prevalence and course of cognitive symptoms are often limited to patient reported outcomes or studies recruited at specialized centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective, non-interventional population based POPCOV2 study, 156 subjects who performed SARS-CoV-2 testing in the Düsseldorf metropolitan area at public test centers between December 2020 and February 2022 were recruited by handouts. SARS-CoV-2-positive and negatively tested subjects were included within the first seven days after the PCR test results. Cognitive testing was performed at baseline during home quarantine and after 4-6 as well as 12-14 weeks of follow-up. Individuals were examined remotely by videocalls using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in addition to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the SARS-CoV-2-positive group presented with higher levels of fatigue in the BFI. In both the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative groups, some subjects presented attention and memory deficits, defined as a z-score < -1,65 on the SDMT or < 26 points on the MoCA (SDMT: 22.9% in the positive and 8.8% in the negative group, <i>p</i> = 0.024; MoCA: 35.6% in the positive and 27.3% in the negative group, <i>p</i> = 0.313). MoCA and SDMT improved over time in both groups. For MoCA scores, a significant difference between the two groups was only seen at the first follow-up. SDMT z-scores did not differ at any time between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results support previous evidence that mild SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with increased fatigue. However, we found relevant rates of cognitive impairment not only in the infected but also in the control group. This underlines the importance of including a control group in such investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1468204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The majority of people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) only show mild respiratory symptoms. However, some patients with SARS-CoV-2 display neurological symptoms. Data on the exact prevalence and course of cognitive symptoms are often limited to patient reported outcomes or studies recruited at specialized centers.

Methods: For this prospective, non-interventional population based POPCOV2 study, 156 subjects who performed SARS-CoV-2 testing in the Düsseldorf metropolitan area at public test centers between December 2020 and February 2022 were recruited by handouts. SARS-CoV-2-positive and negatively tested subjects were included within the first seven days after the PCR test results. Cognitive testing was performed at baseline during home quarantine and after 4-6 as well as 12-14 weeks of follow-up. Individuals were examined remotely by videocalls using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in addition to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS).

Results: At baseline, the SARS-CoV-2-positive group presented with higher levels of fatigue in the BFI. In both the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative groups, some subjects presented attention and memory deficits, defined as a z-score < -1,65 on the SDMT or < 26 points on the MoCA (SDMT: 22.9% in the positive and 8.8% in the negative group, p = 0.024; MoCA: 35.6% in the positive and 27.3% in the negative group, p = 0.313). MoCA and SDMT improved over time in both groups. For MoCA scores, a significant difference between the two groups was only seen at the first follow-up. SDMT z-scores did not differ at any time between the groups.

Conclusion: These results support previous evidence that mild SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with increased fatigue. However, we found relevant rates of cognitive impairment not only in the infected but also in the control group. This underlines the importance of including a control group in such investigations.

基于人群的 SARS-CoV-2 患者认知测试 (POPCOV2) 研究:对 PCR 阳性病例和阴性对照组进行远程认知和疲劳筛查的纵向调查。
背景:大多数严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染者仅表现出轻微的呼吸道症状。然而,一些 SARS-CoV-2 患者会出现神经系统症状。有关认知症状的确切发病率和病程的数据通常仅限于患者报告的结果或在专业中心进行的研究:在这项基于人群的前瞻性、非干预性 POPCOV2 研究中,通过发放问卷的方式招募了 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在杜塞尔多夫大都会区公共检测中心进行 SARS-CoV-2 检测的 156 名受试者。SARS-CoV-2阳性和阴性受试者在PCR检测结果出来后的头七天内被纳入其中。在家庭隔离期间的基线、4-6 周和 12-14 周的随访后进行认知测试。除了简易疲劳量表(BFI)和贝克抑郁量表-快速筛查(BDI-FS)外,还使用符号数字模型测试(SDMT)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)通过视频电话对受试者进行了远程检查:基线时,SARS-CoV-2 阳性组在 BFI 中的疲劳程度较高。在SARS-CoV-2阳性组和SARS-CoV-2阴性组中,一些受试者出现了注意力和记忆力缺陷(定义为z-score p = 0.024;MoCA:阳性组为35.6%,阴性组为27.3%,p = 0.313)。随着时间的推移,两组患者的 MoCA 和 SDMT 均有所改善。就 MoCA 分数而言,两组之间仅在首次随访时存在显著差异。SDMT的z-scores在任何时候在两组之间都没有差异:这些结果支持之前的证据,即轻度 SARS-CoV-2 感染与疲劳增加有关。然而,我们发现不仅在感染组中,在对照组中也存在认知障碍。这强调了在此类调查中加入对照组的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信