Luca Antonia Grebe, Paul Richter, Torben Altenkirch, Marcel Mann, Markus Jan Müller, Jochen Büchs, Jørgen Barsett Magnus
{"title":"Sampling-free investigation of microbial carbon source preferences on renewable feedstocks via online monitoring of oxygen transfer rate.","authors":"Luca Antonia Grebe, Paul Richter, Torben Altenkirch, Marcel Mann, Markus Jan Müller, Jochen Büchs, Jørgen Barsett Magnus","doi":"10.1007/s00449-024-03117-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transition towards sustainable bioprocesses requires renewable feedstocks to reduce dependency on finite resources. While plant-based feedstocks offer significant potential, their complex composition poses new challenges. The microorganisms often exhibit polyauxic growth when presented with multiple carbon sources simultaneously, consuming them in a distinct order according to their carbon source preferences. The traditional investigation of polyauxic growth involves laborious sampling and offline analysis, hindering high-throughput screenings. This study introduces an efficient method for identifying carbon source consumption and their order of metabolization by various microorganisms using the respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS) in shake flasks. As aerobic carbon metabolization and oxygen consumption are strictly correlated, the characteristic phases of polyauxic growth are visible in the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) and can be assigned to the respective carbon sources. An extended 16-flask RAMOS enables real-time monitoring of microbial respiration on up to seven carbon sources and one reference cultivation simultaneously, thus providing crucial insights into their metabolization without extensive sampling and offline analysis. The method's accuracy was validated against traditional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Its applicability to both fast-growing Escherichia coli (investigated carbon sources: glucose, arabinose, sorbitol, xylose, and glycerol) and slow-growing Ustilago trichophora (glucose, glycerol, xylose, sorbitol, rhamnose, galacturonic acid, and lactic acid) was demonstrated. Additionally, it was successfully applied to the plant-based second-generation feedstock corn leaf hydrolysate, revealing the bioavailability of the included carbon sources (glucose, sucrose, arabinose, xylose, and galactose) and their order of metabolization by Ustilago maydis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-024-03117-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transition towards sustainable bioprocesses requires renewable feedstocks to reduce dependency on finite resources. While plant-based feedstocks offer significant potential, their complex composition poses new challenges. The microorganisms often exhibit polyauxic growth when presented with multiple carbon sources simultaneously, consuming them in a distinct order according to their carbon source preferences. The traditional investigation of polyauxic growth involves laborious sampling and offline analysis, hindering high-throughput screenings. This study introduces an efficient method for identifying carbon source consumption and their order of metabolization by various microorganisms using the respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS) in shake flasks. As aerobic carbon metabolization and oxygen consumption are strictly correlated, the characteristic phases of polyauxic growth are visible in the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) and can be assigned to the respective carbon sources. An extended 16-flask RAMOS enables real-time monitoring of microbial respiration on up to seven carbon sources and one reference cultivation simultaneously, thus providing crucial insights into their metabolization without extensive sampling and offline analysis. The method's accuracy was validated against traditional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Its applicability to both fast-growing Escherichia coli (investigated carbon sources: glucose, arabinose, sorbitol, xylose, and glycerol) and slow-growing Ustilago trichophora (glucose, glycerol, xylose, sorbitol, rhamnose, galacturonic acid, and lactic acid) was demonstrated. Additionally, it was successfully applied to the plant-based second-generation feedstock corn leaf hydrolysate, revealing the bioavailability of the included carbon sources (glucose, sucrose, arabinose, xylose, and galactose) and their order of metabolization by Ustilago maydis.
期刊介绍:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes.
Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged.
The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.