Effects of an open-label placebo on visual attention directed to food high in sugar, appetite, and desire for sweet taste.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jonas Potthoff, Anne Schienle
{"title":"Effects of an open-label placebo on visual attention directed to food high in sugar, appetite, and desire for sweet taste.","authors":"Jonas Potthoff, Anne Schienle","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interventions with deceptive placebos can reduce visual attention directed to high-calorie sweets. Open-label placebos (OLPs), which avoid the ethical concerns associated with deception, have shown promise in various fields. This is the first study to test the effects of OLPs on appetite, desire for sweet taste and visual attention for high-sugar foods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this preregistered laboratory study, fifty-three females (mean age = 22.8 years) were presented with image pairs depicting food high vs. low in sugar as well as non-food items. The image presentation was conducted once with and without an OLP. Different indicators of visual attention (total fixation duration, number of fixations, first fixation location), general appetite and the desire to eat the depicted food items were assessed. Moreover, participants tasted and evaluated a sucrose solution to determine their desire for the sweet taste.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OLP decreased general appetite (p = .005, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .09) and the desire to taste the sucrose solution again (p = .036, d = .30). The intervention did not affect visual attention: both conditions (with/without OLP) were characterized by a longer total fixation duration and a higher number of fixations for images with low-sugar food compared to high-sugar food when presented alongside images of non-food.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OLP did not reduce visual attention toward images of high-sugar food, and OLP effects were only observed in self-report measures. Future research should elaborate on how the efficacy of OLPs can be improved or whether deception is necessary to decrease visual attention via placebos.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107820"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interventions with deceptive placebos can reduce visual attention directed to high-calorie sweets. Open-label placebos (OLPs), which avoid the ethical concerns associated with deception, have shown promise in various fields. This is the first study to test the effects of OLPs on appetite, desire for sweet taste and visual attention for high-sugar foods.

Methods: In this preregistered laboratory study, fifty-three females (mean age = 22.8 years) were presented with image pairs depicting food high vs. low in sugar as well as non-food items. The image presentation was conducted once with and without an OLP. Different indicators of visual attention (total fixation duration, number of fixations, first fixation location), general appetite and the desire to eat the depicted food items were assessed. Moreover, participants tasted and evaluated a sucrose solution to determine their desire for the sweet taste.

Results: The OLP decreased general appetite (p = .005, ηp2 = .09) and the desire to taste the sucrose solution again (p = .036, d = .30). The intervention did not affect visual attention: both conditions (with/without OLP) were characterized by a longer total fixation duration and a higher number of fixations for images with low-sugar food compared to high-sugar food when presented alongside images of non-food.

Conclusion: The OLP did not reduce visual attention toward images of high-sugar food, and OLP effects were only observed in self-report measures. Future research should elaborate on how the efficacy of OLPs can be improved or whether deception is necessary to decrease visual attention via placebos.

开放标签安慰剂对高糖食物的视觉注意力、食欲和对甜味的渴望的影响。
背景:使用欺骗性安慰剂进行干预可以减少对高热量甜食的视觉注意。开放标签安慰剂(OLPs)可以避免与欺骗相关的道德问题,在各个领域都显示出良好的前景。这是第一项测试开放标签安慰剂对食欲、对甜味的渴望以及对高糖食品的视觉注意力的影响的研究:在这项预先登记的实验室研究中,53 名女性(平均年龄 = 22.8 岁)接受了描述高糖食物和低糖食物以及非食物的图像对。图像演示分别在有 OLP 和没有 OLP 的情况下进行一次。对视觉注意力的不同指标(总固定时间、固定次数、首次固定位置)、总体食欲和对所描述食物的进食欲望进行了评估。此外,参与者还品尝并评估了蔗糖溶液,以确定他们对甜味的渴望:OLP降低了一般食欲(p = .005,ηp2 =.09)和再次品尝蔗糖溶液的欲望(p = .036,d = 0.30)。干预措施并未影响视觉注意力:两种情况(有/无 OLP)的特点都是,与非食物图像同时出现时,低糖食物图像与高糖食物图像的总固定时间更长,固定次数更多:结论:OLP并未降低对高糖食物图像的视觉注意力,OLP效应仅在自我报告测量中观察到。未来的研究应详细阐述如何提高OLP的效果,或者是否需要通过欺骗来通过安慰剂降低视觉注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信