How (highly unique) Mrs Jones can meet (highly scientific) precision medicine? An introduction to values-based practice

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
KWM (Bill) Fulford , Arnaud Plagnol
{"title":"How (highly unique) Mrs Jones can meet (highly scientific) precision medicine? An introduction to values-based practice","authors":"KWM (Bill) Fulford ,&nbsp;Arnaud Plagnol","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a tension in contemporary clinical care between generalization, as required in the scientific process of evidence-based medicine, and personalization, as required for the autonomy and care's meaning of an always unique patient. We present here some of the key elements of values-based practice, a shared decision-making process that aims to reconcile these two major trends in clinical care. Values practice is rooted in pioneer work about values from ‘ordinary language’ analytic philosophy (the ‘Oxford School’). As such, it has developed in response to key insights from ways of thinking the world, highlighting the universality of values in care. Values-based practice is a partner to both evidence-based practice and ethics for supporting shared decision-making when complex and sometimes conflicting values are is in play. The story of Mrs Jones’ knee, an everyday situation of surgical care, and the Montgomery ruling, a famous legal case from the UK Supreme Court, show why it is so essential to incorporate the values of the individual patient within a model of shared decision-making. Values-based practice relies on learnable clinical skills allowing clinicians to take into account the actual values of every unique person involved in a unique situation. This is required if precision medicine is to deliver genuinely personalized medicine as the basis of truly person-centred clinical care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":"51 1","pages":"Pages S17-S22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013700624002355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a tension in contemporary clinical care between generalization, as required in the scientific process of evidence-based medicine, and personalization, as required for the autonomy and care's meaning of an always unique patient. We present here some of the key elements of values-based practice, a shared decision-making process that aims to reconcile these two major trends in clinical care. Values practice is rooted in pioneer work about values from ‘ordinary language’ analytic philosophy (the ‘Oxford School’). As such, it has developed in response to key insights from ways of thinking the world, highlighting the universality of values in care. Values-based practice is a partner to both evidence-based practice and ethics for supporting shared decision-making when complex and sometimes conflicting values are is in play. The story of Mrs Jones’ knee, an everyday situation of surgical care, and the Montgomery ruling, a famous legal case from the UK Supreme Court, show why it is so essential to incorporate the values of the individual patient within a model of shared decision-making. Values-based practice relies on learnable clinical skills allowing clinicians to take into account the actual values of every unique person involved in a unique situation. This is required if precision medicine is to deliver genuinely personalized medicine as the basis of truly person-centred clinical care.
高度独特的)琼斯夫人如何满足(高度科学的)精准医学?基于价值观的实践简介。
在当代临床护理中,泛化与个性化之间存在着紧张关系,泛化是循证医学的科学过程所需要的,个性化是一个始终独特的病人的自主性和护理意义所需要的。我们在这里提出了一些基于价值观的实践的关键要素,一个共同的决策过程,旨在调和这两个主要趋势在临床护理。价值实践植根于“普通语言”分析哲学(“牛津学派”)关于价值的先驱工作。因此,它是根据世界思维方式的关键见解而发展起来的,突出了护理价值观的普遍性。基于价值观的实践是基于证据的实践和道德的伙伴,在复杂的、有时相互冲突的价值观起作用时,支持共同决策。琼斯女士膝盖的故事是外科护理的日常情况,蒙哥马利的裁决是英国最高法院(UK Supreme Court)的一个著名法律案例,说明了为什么在共同决策的模式中纳入个体患者的价值观是如此重要。基于价值观的实践依赖于可学习的临床技能,使临床医生能够考虑到在独特情况下涉及的每个独特人的实际价值。如果精准医学要提供真正的个性化医疗,作为真正以人为本的临床护理的基础,这是必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信