Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment Promotes Weight Loss by Increasing Eating Disorder Symptoms: A Response to Grilo & Pittman (2024).

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Cheri A Levinson, Juan C Hernández, Luis E Sandoval-Araujo
{"title":"Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment Promotes Weight Loss by Increasing Eating Disorder Symptoms: A Response to Grilo & Pittman (2024).","authors":"Cheri A Levinson, Juan C Hernández, Luis E Sandoval-Araujo","doi":"10.1002/eat.24357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We provide commentary on the Grilo and Pittman (2024). Exploring Dietary Restraint as a Mediator of Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments on Outcomes for Patients With Binge-Eating Disorder With Obesity article published in the International Journal of Eating Disorders. Grilo and Pittman show that weight loss in the Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment condition is mediated by an increase in rigid restraint, whereas binge eating is not mediated by rigid restraint. They conclude that this result is a positive outcome for patients with binge-eating disorder and shows that BWL is not harmful in this population. We argue that increasing rigid restraint equates to increasing eating disorder symptoms and is harmful in any population, but specifically in those with an already diagnosed eating disorder. In addition, we point out the major limitations of no follow-up data in the mediation report, no measurement of additional eating disorder symptoms that could represent diagnostic migration, and lack of inclusion of weight stigma as additional problems with the stated conclusions. We recommend that the field moves away from measurement of weight loss as an outcome in those with eating disorders and carefully consider what it means to increase restraint/restriction in eating disorder populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We provide commentary on the Grilo and Pittman (2024). Exploring Dietary Restraint as a Mediator of Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments on Outcomes for Patients With Binge-Eating Disorder With Obesity article published in the International Journal of Eating Disorders. Grilo and Pittman show that weight loss in the Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment condition is mediated by an increase in rigid restraint, whereas binge eating is not mediated by rigid restraint. They conclude that this result is a positive outcome for patients with binge-eating disorder and shows that BWL is not harmful in this population. We argue that increasing rigid restraint equates to increasing eating disorder symptoms and is harmful in any population, but specifically in those with an already diagnosed eating disorder. In addition, we point out the major limitations of no follow-up data in the mediation report, no measurement of additional eating disorder symptoms that could represent diagnostic migration, and lack of inclusion of weight stigma as additional problems with the stated conclusions. We recommend that the field moves away from measurement of weight loss as an outcome in those with eating disorders and carefully consider what it means to increase restraint/restriction in eating disorder populations.

我们对 Grilo 和 Pittman(2024 年)的文章进行了评论。国际进食障碍杂志》发表了一篇文章,探讨饮食限制作为行为治疗和认知行为治疗对暴饮暴食障碍伴肥胖症患者治疗结果的中介作用。Grilo 和 Pittman 的研究表明,行为减重治疗条件下的体重减轻是由严格限制的增加所促成的,而暴食则不是由严格限制所促成的。他们的结论是,这一结果对暴饮暴食症患者来说是一个积极的结果,并表明行为减肥法对这一人群无害。我们认为,增加严格克制等同于增加饮食失调症状,对任何人群都是有害的,尤其是对那些已被诊断为饮食失调的人群。此外,我们还指出,调解报告中没有随访数据、没有对可能代表诊断迁移的其他饮食失调症状进行测量、没有将体重耻辱感纳入其中等主要局限性是上述结论的其他问题。我们建议该领域不再将测量体重减轻作为饮食失调症患者的结果,而是仔细考虑在饮食失调人群中增加限制/约束的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信