Studying decision making in rats using a contextual visual discrimination task: Detection and prevention of alternative behavioral strategies.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Alon Amir, Drew B Headley, Mohammad M Herzallah, Asriya Karki, Ian T Kim, Denis Paré
{"title":"Studying decision making in rats using a contextual visual discrimination task: Detection and prevention of alternative behavioral strategies.","authors":"Alon Amir, Drew B Headley, Mohammad M Herzallah, Asriya Karki, Ian T Kim, Denis Paré","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The neural bases of decision-making and contextual sensory discriminations have traditionally been studied in primates, highlighting the role of the prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and flexibility. With the advent of molecular tools to manipulate and monitor neuronal activity, these processes have increasingly been studied in rodents. However, rodent tasks typically consist of two-alternative forced choice paradigms that usually feature coarse sensory discriminations and no contextual dependence, limiting prefrontal involvement in task performance.</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>To circumvent these limitations, we developed a novel contextual visual discrimination task that lends itself to rigorous psychophysical analyses. In this task, rats learn to detect left-right differences in one dimension (e.g. luminance or speed) depending on context while ignoring another (e.g. speed or luminance, respectively). Depending on trials, speed and luminance can be greater on the same side (congruent trials) or on opposite sides (incongruent trials).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rats learned the task in four phases: nose-poking and lever-pressing (∼7 days), discriminating left-right differences in one dimension (∼20 days), discriminating left-right differences in a second dimension (∼10 days), and discriminating left-right differences in one of the two dimensions depending on context (∼2.5 months). A 20:80 ratio of congruent to incongruent trials is used to prevent rats from adopting alternative strategies.</p><p><strong>Comparison with existing methods: </strong>This task is comparable to contextual sensory discrimination tasks used in monkeys. Few equivalent tasks exist in rodents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This task will allow investigators to use the full neuroscientific armamentarium to study contextual neural coding in the rat prefrontal cortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The neural bases of decision-making and contextual sensory discriminations have traditionally been studied in primates, highlighting the role of the prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and flexibility. With the advent of molecular tools to manipulate and monitor neuronal activity, these processes have increasingly been studied in rodents. However, rodent tasks typically consist of two-alternative forced choice paradigms that usually feature coarse sensory discriminations and no contextual dependence, limiting prefrontal involvement in task performance.

New method: To circumvent these limitations, we developed a novel contextual visual discrimination task that lends itself to rigorous psychophysical analyses. In this task, rats learn to detect left-right differences in one dimension (e.g. luminance or speed) depending on context while ignoring another (e.g. speed or luminance, respectively). Depending on trials, speed and luminance can be greater on the same side (congruent trials) or on opposite sides (incongruent trials).

Results: Rats learned the task in four phases: nose-poking and lever-pressing (∼7 days), discriminating left-right differences in one dimension (∼20 days), discriminating left-right differences in a second dimension (∼10 days), and discriminating left-right differences in one of the two dimensions depending on context (∼2.5 months). A 20:80 ratio of congruent to incongruent trials is used to prevent rats from adopting alternative strategies.

Comparison with existing methods: This task is comparable to contextual sensory discrimination tasks used in monkeys. Few equivalent tasks exist in rodents.

Conclusions: This task will allow investigators to use the full neuroscientific armamentarium to study contextual neural coding in the rat prefrontal cortex.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信