Balancing Privacy and Accuracy Using Significant Gradient Protection in Federated Learning

IF 3.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Benteng Zhang;Yingchi Mao;Xiaoming He;Huawei Huang;Jie Wu
{"title":"Balancing Privacy and Accuracy Using Significant Gradient Protection in Federated Learning","authors":"Benteng Zhang;Yingchi Mao;Xiaoming He;Huawei Huang;Jie Wu","doi":"10.1109/TC.2024.3477971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous state-of-the-art studies have demonstrated that adversaries can access sensitive user data by membership inference attacks (MIAs) in Federated Learning (FL). Introducing differential privacy (DP) into the FL framework is an effective way to enhance the privacy of FL. Nevertheless, in differentially private federated learning (DP-FL), local gradients become excessively sparse in certain training rounds. Especially when training with low privacy budgets, there is a risk of introducing excessive noise into clients’ gradients. This issue can lead to a significant degradation in the accuracy of the global model. Thus, how to balance the user's privacy and global model accuracy becomes a challenge in DP-FL. To this end, we propose an approach, known as differential privacy federated aggregation, based on significant gradient protection (DP-FedASGP). DP-FedASGP can mitigate excessive noises by protecting significant gradients and accelerate the convergence of the global model by calculating dynamic aggregation weights for gradients. Experimental results show that DP-FedASGP achieves comparable privacy protection effects to DP-FedAvg and cpSGD (communication-private SGD based on gradient quantization) but outperforms DP-FedSNLC (sparse noise based on clipping losses and privacy budget costs) and FedSMP (sparsified model perturbation). Furthermore, the average global test accuracy of DP-FedASGP across four datasets and three models is about \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$2.62$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n%, \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$4.71$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n%, \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$0.45$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n%, and \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$0.19$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n% higher than the above methods, respectively. These improvements indicate that DP-FedASGP is a promising approach for balancing the privacy and accuracy of DP-FL.","PeriodicalId":13087,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Computers","volume":"74 1","pages":"278-292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Computers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10713222/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous state-of-the-art studies have demonstrated that adversaries can access sensitive user data by membership inference attacks (MIAs) in Federated Learning (FL). Introducing differential privacy (DP) into the FL framework is an effective way to enhance the privacy of FL. Nevertheless, in differentially private federated learning (DP-FL), local gradients become excessively sparse in certain training rounds. Especially when training with low privacy budgets, there is a risk of introducing excessive noise into clients’ gradients. This issue can lead to a significant degradation in the accuracy of the global model. Thus, how to balance the user's privacy and global model accuracy becomes a challenge in DP-FL. To this end, we propose an approach, known as differential privacy federated aggregation, based on significant gradient protection (DP-FedASGP). DP-FedASGP can mitigate excessive noises by protecting significant gradients and accelerate the convergence of the global model by calculating dynamic aggregation weights for gradients. Experimental results show that DP-FedASGP achieves comparable privacy protection effects to DP-FedAvg and cpSGD (communication-private SGD based on gradient quantization) but outperforms DP-FedSNLC (sparse noise based on clipping losses and privacy budget costs) and FedSMP (sparsified model perturbation). Furthermore, the average global test accuracy of DP-FedASGP across four datasets and three models is about $2.62$ %, $4.71$ %, $0.45$ %, and $0.19$ % higher than the above methods, respectively. These improvements indicate that DP-FedASGP is a promising approach for balancing the privacy and accuracy of DP-FL.
在联邦学习中使用显著梯度保护平衡隐私和准确性
先前的最新研究表明,攻击者可以通过联邦学习(FL)中的成员推理攻击(mia)访问敏感用户数据。在FL框架中引入差分隐私(DP)是增强FL隐私性的有效方法,但在差分隐私联邦学习(DP-FL)中,局部梯度在某些训练轮中会变得过于稀疏。特别是在隐私预算较低的情况下进行训练时,有可能在客户端的梯度中引入过多的噪声。这个问题会导致全球模型的精度显著下降。因此,如何平衡用户隐私和全局模型精度成为DP-FL的一个挑战。为此,我们提出了一种基于显著梯度保护(DP-FedASGP)的差分隐私联邦聚合方法。DP-FedASGP可以通过保护显著梯度来减轻过度噪声,并通过计算梯度的动态聚合权来加速全局模型的收敛。实验结果表明,DP-FedASGP的隐私保护效果与DP-FedAvg和cpSGD(基于梯度量化的通信私有SGD)相当,但优于DP-FedSNLC(基于裁剪损失和隐私预算成本的稀疏噪声)和FedSMP(稀疏化模型扰动)。此外,DP-FedASGP在4个数据集和3种模型上的平均全局测试精度分别比上述方法高2.62美元%、4.71美元%、0.45美元%和0.19美元%。这些改进表明DP-FedASGP是一种很有前途的平衡DP-FL的隐私性和准确性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Computers
IEEE Transactions on Computers 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Computers is a monthly publication with a wide distribution to researchers, developers, technical managers, and educators in the computer field. It publishes papers on research in areas of current interest to the readers. These areas include, but are not limited to, the following: a) computer organizations and architectures; b) operating systems, software systems, and communication protocols; c) real-time systems and embedded systems; d) digital devices, computer components, and interconnection networks; e) specification, design, prototyping, and testing methods and tools; f) performance, fault tolerance, reliability, security, and testability; g) case studies and experimental and theoretical evaluations; and h) new and important applications and trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信