Association between fatty acids and female infertility: dual evidence from a cross-sectional study and Mendelian randomization analysis.

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Food & Function Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1039/d4fo04020a
Qiaorui Yang, Jing Tao, Shengxiao Jia, Zhenliang Fan
{"title":"Association between fatty acids and female infertility: dual evidence from a cross-sectional study and Mendelian randomization analysis.","authors":"Qiaorui Yang, Jing Tao, Shengxiao Jia, Zhenliang Fan","doi":"10.1039/d4fo04020a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Infertility poses a considerable threat to female reproductive health on a global scale. Dietary pattern, as a modifiable lifestyle factor, is frequently recommended as an important intervention for infertility-related diseases. Fatty acids play a crucial role in maintaining the health of the female reproductive system. However, the available evidence on the specific relationship between various types of fatty acids and infertility remains insufficient and controversial. <i>Methods</i>: Initially, a cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database to collect data from women aged 18-45 years who met the inclusion criteria across the 2013-2020 cycles. Infertility was defined based on information gleaned from reproductive questionnaires. Fatty acid intake was determined by analyzing two 24 hour dietary recall interviews. Weighted logistic regression and weighted restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses, incorporating covariate adjustments, were employed to preliminarily delineate the association between various types of fatty acids and proportions of fatty acid intake and female infertility risk. Model performance evaluation was carried out through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, complemented by the utilization of a nomogram diagram to gauge the infertility risk attributed to covariates. Genetic instrumental variables pertinent to diverse fatty acid profiles and female infertility were sourced from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Mendelian randomization (MR), multivariable MR (MVMR) and reverse MR analyses were subsequently used to ascertain causality and reverse causality between distinct fatty acids and infertility, concurrently assessing for heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. <i>Results</i>: In our NHANES analysis, a total of 3159 women were enrolled in the study, with a self-reported infertility prevalence of 11.49%. Infertile women exhibited significantly elevated intake of total omega-6 and omega-6/total fatty acids (TFA) compared to the controls. Weighted logistic regression models confirmed positive correlations between total omega-6 (continuous) and omega-6/TFA (categorical) and infertility risk, while omega-3 (continuous) intake demonstrated a negative correlation. Model 2, post rigorous multivariate covariate adjustment, showed improved predictive performance according to ROC curve analysis. Subgroup analysis suggested that the positive correlation between omega-6/TFA (continuous) and female infertility risk was not affected by stratification. Total omega-6 (continuous) emerged as a risk factor for infertile women aged 18-34 years. However, total saturated fatty acids (TSFAs, continuous), total omega-3 (continuous) and total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs, categorical) were protective factors only in the infertile women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg m<sup>-2</sup>. The positive associations between total omega-6 (Q4) and omega-6/TFA (continuous and Q3-Q4) and infertility risk were consistent across all BMI subgroups. MR analysis employing inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the primary method and Bonferroni correction revealed that genetically predicted TSFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), omega-6 and MUFA/TFA were positively associated with female infertility risk, whereas PUFA/TFA showed a negative association. Importantly, the positive associations between MUFAs and omega-6 and infertility risk remained robust even after adjusting for potential confounders using MVMR analyses. Reverse MR analysis did not provide any evidence for reverse causality. The MR-Egger regression intercept and Cochran's <i>Q</i> test did not detect any heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. <i>Conclusions</i>: This study presents compelling evidence to substantiate the link between diverse fatty acids, particularly omega-6 PUFAs, and the risk of female infertility. However, to fully comprehend the potential mechanisms and impact of distinct fatty acids and their compositional ratios on female infertility, extensive future research spanning fundamental and large-scale clinical inquiries is imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4fo04020a","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility poses a considerable threat to female reproductive health on a global scale. Dietary pattern, as a modifiable lifestyle factor, is frequently recommended as an important intervention for infertility-related diseases. Fatty acids play a crucial role in maintaining the health of the female reproductive system. However, the available evidence on the specific relationship between various types of fatty acids and infertility remains insufficient and controversial. Methods: Initially, a cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database to collect data from women aged 18-45 years who met the inclusion criteria across the 2013-2020 cycles. Infertility was defined based on information gleaned from reproductive questionnaires. Fatty acid intake was determined by analyzing two 24 hour dietary recall interviews. Weighted logistic regression and weighted restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses, incorporating covariate adjustments, were employed to preliminarily delineate the association between various types of fatty acids and proportions of fatty acid intake and female infertility risk. Model performance evaluation was carried out through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, complemented by the utilization of a nomogram diagram to gauge the infertility risk attributed to covariates. Genetic instrumental variables pertinent to diverse fatty acid profiles and female infertility were sourced from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Mendelian randomization (MR), multivariable MR (MVMR) and reverse MR analyses were subsequently used to ascertain causality and reverse causality between distinct fatty acids and infertility, concurrently assessing for heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. Results: In our NHANES analysis, a total of 3159 women were enrolled in the study, with a self-reported infertility prevalence of 11.49%. Infertile women exhibited significantly elevated intake of total omega-6 and omega-6/total fatty acids (TFA) compared to the controls. Weighted logistic regression models confirmed positive correlations between total omega-6 (continuous) and omega-6/TFA (categorical) and infertility risk, while omega-3 (continuous) intake demonstrated a negative correlation. Model 2, post rigorous multivariate covariate adjustment, showed improved predictive performance according to ROC curve analysis. Subgroup analysis suggested that the positive correlation between omega-6/TFA (continuous) and female infertility risk was not affected by stratification. Total omega-6 (continuous) emerged as a risk factor for infertile women aged 18-34 years. However, total saturated fatty acids (TSFAs, continuous), total omega-3 (continuous) and total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs, categorical) were protective factors only in the infertile women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg m-2. The positive associations between total omega-6 (Q4) and omega-6/TFA (continuous and Q3-Q4) and infertility risk were consistent across all BMI subgroups. MR analysis employing inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the primary method and Bonferroni correction revealed that genetically predicted TSFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), omega-6 and MUFA/TFA were positively associated with female infertility risk, whereas PUFA/TFA showed a negative association. Importantly, the positive associations between MUFAs and omega-6 and infertility risk remained robust even after adjusting for potential confounders using MVMR analyses. Reverse MR analysis did not provide any evidence for reverse causality. The MR-Egger regression intercept and Cochran's Q test did not detect any heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Conclusions: This study presents compelling evidence to substantiate the link between diverse fatty acids, particularly omega-6 PUFAs, and the risk of female infertility. However, to fully comprehend the potential mechanisms and impact of distinct fatty acids and their compositional ratios on female infertility, extensive future research spanning fundamental and large-scale clinical inquiries is imperative.

背景:在全球范围内,不孕症对女性生殖健康构成了相当大的威胁。饮食模式作为一种可改变的生活方式因素,经常被推荐为治疗不孕不育相关疾病的重要干预措施。脂肪酸在维持女性生殖系统健康方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,关于各类脂肪酸与不孕症之间具体关系的现有证据仍然不足,且存在争议。研究方法最初,我们利用美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)数据库开展了一项横断面研究,收集了 2013-2020 年周期内符合纳入标准的 18-45 岁女性的数据。不孕症的定义基于从生殖调查问卷中收集到的信息。脂肪酸摄入量是通过分析两次 24 小时饮食回忆访谈确定的。通过加权逻辑回归和加权限制立方样条曲线(RCS)分析,并结合协变量调整,初步确定了各种类型脂肪酸和脂肪酸摄入比例与女性不孕风险之间的关系。通过接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析对模型的性能进行评估,并辅以代用图来衡量由协变量引起的不孕风险。与不同脂肪酸谱和女性不孕症有关的遗传工具变量来自全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。随后使用孟德尔随机化(MR)、多变量 MR(MVMR)和反向 MR 分析来确定不同脂肪酸与不孕症之间的因果关系和反向因果关系,同时评估异质性和水平多义性。结果在我们的 NHANES 分析中,共有 3159 名妇女参加了研究,自述不孕率为 11.49%。与对照组相比,不孕妇女的总欧米伽-6和欧米伽-6/总脂肪酸(TFA)摄入量明显升高。加权逻辑回归模型证实,总欧米茄-6(连续)和欧米茄-6/总脂肪酸(分类)与不孕风险呈正相关,而欧米茄-3(连续)摄入量呈负相关。模型2经过严格的多变量协变量调整后,根据ROC曲线分析显示其预测性能有所提高。亚组分析表明,欧米伽-6/反式脂肪酸(连续型)与女性不孕风险之间的正相关性不受分层的影响。总欧米茄-6(连续型)成为18-34岁不孕女性的一个风险因素。然而,总饱和脂肪酸(TSFAs,连续型)、总欧米加-3(omega-3,连续型)和总多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs,分类型)仅对体重指数(BMI)≥ 25 kg m-2的不孕女性具有保护作用。总欧米茄-6(Q4)和欧米茄-6/TFA(连续和Q3-Q4)与不孕风险之间的正相关关系在所有体重指数亚组中都是一致的。以反向方差加权(IVW)为主要方法并进行 Bonferroni 校正的 MR 分析表明,基因预测的 TSFAs、单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFAs)、ω-6 和 MUFA/TFA 与女性不孕风险呈正相关,而 PUFA/TFA 则呈负相关。重要的是,即使使用MVMR分析调整了潜在的混杂因素,MUFAs和ω-6与不孕症风险之间的正相关关系仍然保持稳定。反向 MR 分析没有提供任何反向因果关系的证据。MR-Egger回归截距和Cochran's Q检验未发现任何异质性或水平多向性。结论这项研究提供了令人信服的证据,证实了多种脂肪酸(尤其是欧米加-6 PUFAs)与女性不孕症风险之间的联系。然而,要想全面了解不同脂肪酸及其组成比例对女性不孕症的潜在机制和影响,今后必须开展广泛的基础研究和大规模临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food & Function
Food & Function BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
957
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信