Invited review: Antimicrobial resistance genes in milk—A 10-year systematic review and critical comment

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Theresa Sievers, Julia A. Blumenberg, Christina S. Hölzel
{"title":"Invited review: Antimicrobial resistance genes in milk—A 10-year systematic review and critical comment","authors":"Theresa Sievers,&nbsp;Julia A. Blumenberg,&nbsp;Christina S. Hölzel","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in milk is eagerly discussed as a public health risk, and frequently investigated. Here, we perform a systematic review on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in milk from primary production over a 10-year period. We aim to provide a comprehensive dataset on known and emerging antimicrobial resistance genes in major mastitis pathogens, occurring worldwide in milk at primary production, and to critically discuss the relevance and constraints of these findings. We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed studies published between 2012 and 2022 that fit fixed combinations of key words and did not meet exclusion criteria such as “mixed with other sources.” For synthesis, data on occurrence was extracted from studies and supplements. To address plausibility issues, we performed an National Center of Biotechnology Information Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search. Our search revealed 2,222 publications in total. Of them, 500 studies were eligible for full-text reads and 306 publications were included in data compilation. An overwhelming majority of studies dealt with <em>mec</em>A in <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, followed by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-encoding genes such as <em>bla</em>CTXM in <em>Escherichia coli</em>, while other mastitis pathogens, such as <em>Streptococcus</em> spp., were scarcely investigated. In most cases, &lt;5% of milk samples were positive for major pathogens bearing the antimicrobial resistance gene of interest. However, huge study-to-study differences were found between regions, but also on a national level. For instance, the estimate prevalence of <em>Escherichia coli</em>-borne <em>bla</em>CTXM in mastitis milk samples ranged from 0.0% to 55%, with a median value of 7.3%, but in healthy individuals and bulk milk, the prevalence ranged from 0.0% to 20.0%, with a median value of 0.8%. Several studies reported antimicrobial resistance genes for the very first time in a species, but did not stand up to scrutiny. As an example, frequent detection of <em>bla</em>TEM-genes in streptococci is most likely attributed to contamination of molecular reagents, as reported elsewhere. Despite the large amount of data, there is a need for more quality control, more representative sampling of milk, more quantitative research, and deeper insights into bacterial genomics, to identify relevant or emerging antimicrobial resistance genes in milk. Considering a low percentage of contaminated milk samples, unknown ARG concentrations, and an unproven role in human disease, the risk attributed to ARG in milk seems to be exaggerated by far. However, the risk of ARG selection on farm, resulting in low treatment success in cattle, is a real one and should be met by prudent use of antibiotics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"108 5","pages":"Pages 4508-4543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224013420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in milk is eagerly discussed as a public health risk, and frequently investigated. Here, we perform a systematic review on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in milk from primary production over a 10-year period. We aim to provide a comprehensive dataset on known and emerging antimicrobial resistance genes in major mastitis pathogens, occurring worldwide in milk at primary production, and to critically discuss the relevance and constraints of these findings. We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed studies published between 2012 and 2022 that fit fixed combinations of key words and did not meet exclusion criteria such as “mixed with other sources.” For synthesis, data on occurrence was extracted from studies and supplements. To address plausibility issues, we performed an National Center of Biotechnology Information Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search. Our search revealed 2,222 publications in total. Of them, 500 studies were eligible for full-text reads and 306 publications were included in data compilation. An overwhelming majority of studies dealt with mecA in Staphylococcus aureus, followed by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-encoding genes such as blaCTXM in Escherichia coli, while other mastitis pathogens, such as Streptococcus spp., were scarcely investigated. In most cases, <5% of milk samples were positive for major pathogens bearing the antimicrobial resistance gene of interest. However, huge study-to-study differences were found between regions, but also on a national level. For instance, the estimate prevalence of Escherichia coli-borne blaCTXM in mastitis milk samples ranged from 0.0% to 55%, with a median value of 7.3%, but in healthy individuals and bulk milk, the prevalence ranged from 0.0% to 20.0%, with a median value of 0.8%. Several studies reported antimicrobial resistance genes for the very first time in a species, but did not stand up to scrutiny. As an example, frequent detection of blaTEM-genes in streptococci is most likely attributed to contamination of molecular reagents, as reported elsewhere. Despite the large amount of data, there is a need for more quality control, more representative sampling of milk, more quantitative research, and deeper insights into bacterial genomics, to identify relevant or emerging antimicrobial resistance genes in milk. Considering a low percentage of contaminated milk samples, unknown ARG concentrations, and an unproven role in human disease, the risk attributed to ARG in milk seems to be exaggerated by far. However, the risk of ARG selection on farm, resulting in low treatment success in cattle, is a real one and should be met by prudent use of antibiotics.
特邀评论:牛奶中的抗菌素耐药基因:10年的系统回顾和批判性评论。
背景:牛奶中抗菌素耐药基因的出现作为一种公共卫生风险被热切讨论,并经常进行调查。在这里,我们对10年来初级生产的牛奶中抗菌素耐药基因的丰度进行了系统回顾。目的:我们的目的是提供一个关于主要乳腺炎病原体中已知和新出现的抗微生物药物耐药基因的综合数据集,在世界范围内发生在初级生产的牛奶中,并批判性地讨论这些发现的相关性和局限性。数据来源和综合:我们在Pubmed检索了2012年至2022年间发表的同行评议研究,这些研究符合固定的关键字组合,并且不符合“与其他来源混合”等排除标准。为了进行综合,发生率数据取自研究和补充资料。为了解决合理性问题,我们执行了NCBI BLAST搜索。结果与局限性。我们的搜索总共显示了2222篇出版物。其中500项研究符合全文阅读条件,306份出版物纳入数据汇编。绝大多数研究涉及金黄色葡萄球菌中的mecA,其次是大肠杆菌中的blaCTXM等广谱β-内酰胺酶编码基因,而其他乳腺炎病原体如链球菌的研究很少。在大多数情况下,< 5%的牛奶样品对携带感兴趣的抗菌素耐药基因的主要病原体呈阳性。然而,在地区之间,以及在国家层面上,发现了巨大的研究差异。例如,在乳腺炎牛奶样本中,大肠杆菌携带的blaCTXM的估计流行率为0.0%至55%,中位数为8.02%,而在健康个体和散装牛奶中,流行率为0.0%至20.0%,中位数为0.8%。几项研究首次在一个物种中发现了抗微生物药物耐药性基因,但没有经受住审查。例如,正如其他地方报道的那样,在链球菌中频繁检测到tem基因最有可能归因于分子试剂的污染。结论:尽管数据量巨大,但仍需要更多的质量控制、更具代表性的牛奶采样、更多的定量研究和更深入的细菌基因组学研究,以确定牛奶中相关和/或新出现的抗微生物药物耐药性基因。考虑到受污染牛奶样本的百分比很低,arg浓度未知,以及在人类疾病中的作用尚未得到证实,牛奶中arg的风险似乎被夸大了。然而,农场选择arg导致牛治疗成功率低的风险是真实存在的,应该通过谨慎使用抗生素来应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信