Risk Factors For Progression From Biochemical Leak to Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. The Key of the Lock: Prognostic Nutritional Index.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mehmet Can Aydin, Oguzhan Ozsay, Kagan Karabulut, Recep Bircan, Fatih Atalay, Mehmet Batuhan Ors
{"title":"Risk Factors For Progression From Biochemical Leak to Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. The Key of the Lock: Prognostic Nutritional Index.","authors":"Mehmet Can Aydin, Oguzhan Ozsay, Kagan Karabulut, Recep Bircan, Fatih Atalay, Mehmet Batuhan Ors","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2024.24425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), which is considered the most frightening complication after pancreatic oduodenectomy (PD), continues to be a serious problem even in experienced centers. In the present study, we aimed to determine the risk factors that increase the progression from biochemical leak (BL) to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after PD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 152 patients who underwent PD. A total of 71 patients who developed POPF were included in the study and divided into two groups: 52 patients remained in the BL stage and 19 patients progressed from BL to CR-POPF. The groups were compared in terms of preoperative data, perioperative findings, and postoperative results. Risk factors for progression from BL to CR-POPF were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was significantly lower in the CR-POPF group compared to the BL group (35.6 (30.1-47.9) vs 41.6 (33.5-58), P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the best cutoff of preoperative PNI value for predicting this progression was 38 (AUC = 0.835; 95% CI, 0.717-0.953; P = .001). While the progression rate was 58.3% in the group with PNI < 38, it was 10.6% with PNI ≥ 38. In univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative PNI value was the only independent risk factor for progression from BL to CR-POPF after PD (OR, 15.428; 95% CI, 3.714-64.085; P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative PNI value is an important parameter predicting the progression from BL to CR-POPF after PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51205,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2024.24425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), which is considered the most frightening complication after pancreatic oduodenectomy (PD), continues to be a serious problem even in experienced centers. In the present study, we aimed to determine the risk factors that increase the progression from biochemical leak (BL) to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after PD.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 152 patients who underwent PD. A total of 71 patients who developed POPF were included in the study and divided into two groups: 52 patients remained in the BL stage and 19 patients progressed from BL to CR-POPF. The groups were compared in terms of preoperative data, perioperative findings, and postoperative results. Risk factors for progression from BL to CR-POPF were analyzed.

Results: Preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was significantly lower in the CR-POPF group compared to the BL group (35.6 (30.1-47.9) vs 41.6 (33.5-58), P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the best cutoff of preoperative PNI value for predicting this progression was 38 (AUC = 0.835; 95% CI, 0.717-0.953; P = .001). While the progression rate was 58.3% in the group with PNI < 38, it was 10.6% with PNI ≥ 38. In univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative PNI value was the only independent risk factor for progression from BL to CR-POPF after PD (OR, 15.428; 95% CI, 3.714-64.085; P < .01).

Conclusion: Preoperative PNI value is an important parameter predicting the progression from BL to CR-POPF after PD.

胰十二指肠切除术后生化泄漏发展为临床相关胰瘘的危险因素。这把锁的钥匙:预后营养指数。
背景/目的:胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘(POPF)被认为是胰十二指肠切除术后最可怕的并发症,即使在经验丰富的中心也仍然是一个严重的问题。在本研究中,我们旨在确定PD术后生化泄漏(BL)发展为临床相关的术后胰瘘(CR-POPF)的危险因素。材料与方法:回顾性分析152例PD患者的资料。研究共纳入71例发生POPF的患者,分为两组:52例患者仍处于BL期,19例患者从BL发展为CR-POPF。比较两组术前资料、围手术期表现和术后结果。分析BL发展为CR-POPF的危险因素。结果:CR-POPF组术前预后营养指数(PNI)明显低于BL组(35.6 (30.1-47.9)vs 41.6 (33.5-58), P < 0.001)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,术前PNI值预测该进展的最佳截止值为38 (AUC = 0.835;95% ci, 0.717-0.953;P = .001)。PNI < 38组的进展率为58.3%,而PNI≥38组的进展率为10.6%。在单因素和多因素分析中,术前PNI值是PD后从BL进展为CR-POPF的唯一独立危险因素(OR, 15.428;95% ci, 3.714-64.085;P < 0.01)。结论:术前PNI值是预测PD术后BL向CR-POPF发展的重要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology (Turk J Gastroenterol) is the double-blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of the Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is a bimonthly publication, published on January, March, May, July, September, November and its publication language is English. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology aims to publish international at the highest clinical and scientific level on original issues of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports and letters to the editor on clinical and experimental gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信