Percutaneous Endoscopic Resection of Lumbar Discal Cyst.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Shuai Ding, Guangquan Zhang, Yanzheng Gao, Zhiqiang Hou, Fuqiang Shao
{"title":"Percutaneous Endoscopic Resection of Lumbar Discal Cyst.","authors":"Shuai Ding, Guangquan Zhang, Yanzheng Gao, Zhiqiang Hou, Fuqiang Shao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discal cysts, an uncommon condition, can replicate the characteristic signs typically linked to a herniated lumbar disc, encompassing discomfort in the lumbar region and neuralgia that extends along the nerve paths, thereby complicating the process of distinguishing the discal cyst from other conditions. Consensus on the treatment of this disease remains elusive, and the best treatment for it is still a matter of controversy. In numerous past reports, this disease has been treated through either open or microscopic surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a minimally invasive endoscopic surgery technique in the treatment of lumbar discal cysts.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This research was initiated with a group of patients selected from the Spinal Surgery Unit at the Henan Provincial People's Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2017 to May 2021, a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure was executed on a cohort of 7 male patients (average age: 30.86 ± 5.24 years), each diagnosed with discal cysts, within our spinal surgery division. The efficacy of the treatment was gauged by pre- and postoperative assessments that used the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Furthermore, the ultimate clinical efficacy of the procedure was appraised in accordance with the revised Macnab criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients reported a prompt and significant relief of symptoms after the surgical removal of the lumbar disc lesions, with no cases of recurrence noted during the follow-up period. A significant drop was observed in the VAS score for lower limb pain, declining from a preoperative mean of 6.86 ± 1.35 to 1.57 ± 0.53 at the final evaluation (P < 0.05). In tandem with this finding, a marked decrease in the ODI score was noted, with a reduction from 69.14 ± 10.76 before surgery to 10.29 ± 5.59 at the concluding review (P < 0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores collectively pointed toward substantial improvements in patients' conditions. When assessed according to the revised Macnab criteria, the outcomes were distributed as follows: 4 patients (57.1%) achieved excellent results, 2 (28.6%) had very good results, and one (14.3%) had a fair result, totaling 6 patients (85.7%) with satisfactory outcomes. No severe complications or recurrences were identified during the postoperative monitoring phase.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This observational retrospective study was based on a convenience sampling that involved a limited number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic resection emerged as a micro-invasive and secure surgical approach for the management of lumbar discal cysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 8","pages":"E873-E879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Discal cysts, an uncommon condition, can replicate the characteristic signs typically linked to a herniated lumbar disc, encompassing discomfort in the lumbar region and neuralgia that extends along the nerve paths, thereby complicating the process of distinguishing the discal cyst from other conditions. Consensus on the treatment of this disease remains elusive, and the best treatment for it is still a matter of controversy. In numerous past reports, this disease has been treated through either open or microscopic surgical approaches.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a minimally invasive endoscopic surgery technique in the treatment of lumbar discal cysts.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis.

Setting: This research was initiated with a group of patients selected from the Spinal Surgery Unit at the Henan Provincial People's Hospital.

Methods: From March 2017 to May 2021, a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure was executed on a cohort of 7 male patients (average age: 30.86 ± 5.24 years), each diagnosed with discal cysts, within our spinal surgery division. The efficacy of the treatment was gauged by pre- and postoperative assessments that used the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Furthermore, the ultimate clinical efficacy of the procedure was appraised in accordance with the revised Macnab criteria.

Results: The patients reported a prompt and significant relief of symptoms after the surgical removal of the lumbar disc lesions, with no cases of recurrence noted during the follow-up period. A significant drop was observed in the VAS score for lower limb pain, declining from a preoperative mean of 6.86 ± 1.35 to 1.57 ± 0.53 at the final evaluation (P < 0.05). In tandem with this finding, a marked decrease in the ODI score was noted, with a reduction from 69.14 ± 10.76 before surgery to 10.29 ± 5.59 at the concluding review (P < 0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores collectively pointed toward substantial improvements in patients' conditions. When assessed according to the revised Macnab criteria, the outcomes were distributed as follows: 4 patients (57.1%) achieved excellent results, 2 (28.6%) had very good results, and one (14.3%) had a fair result, totaling 6 patients (85.7%) with satisfactory outcomes. No severe complications or recurrences were identified during the postoperative monitoring phase.

Limitations: This observational retrospective study was based on a convenience sampling that involved a limited number of patients.

Conclusions: Percutaneous endoscopic resection emerged as a micro-invasive and secure surgical approach for the management of lumbar discal cysts.

经皮内镜下腰椎间盘囊肿切除术。
背景:腰椎间盘囊肿是一种不常见的疾病,它可以复制腰椎间盘突出的典型特征,包括腰部不适和沿神经路径延伸的神经痛,从而使腰椎间盘囊肿与其他疾病的区分过程复杂化。关于治疗这种疾病的共识仍然难以捉摸,最好的治疗方法仍然是一个有争议的问题。在过去的许多报道中,这种疾病通过开放或显微手术方法治疗。目的:本研究的目的是评估微创内镜手术技术治疗腰椎间盘囊肿的疗效和安全性。研究设计:我们进行回顾性观察分析。背景:本研究选取河南省人民医院脊柱外科的一组患者作为研究对象。方法:2017年3月至2021年5月,对7名男性患者(平均年龄:30.86±5.24岁)进行微创内镜手术,每名患者均诊断为椎间盘囊肿,来自我们的脊柱外科。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)进行术前和术后评估,评估治疗效果。此外,根据修订后的Macnab标准评估该手术的最终临床疗效。结果:患者报告手术切除腰椎间盘病变后症状迅速明显缓解,随访期间无复发病例。下肢疼痛VAS评分从术前平均6.86±1.35分下降至最终评分1.57±0.53分(P < 0.05)。与此发现相结合,ODI评分明显下降,从术前的69.14±10.76下降到总结时的10.29±5.59 (P < 0.05)。术后VAS和ODI评分共同表明患者病情有了实质性改善。根据修订后的Macnab标准进行评估,结果分布如下:4例(57.1%)患者获得优秀结果,2例(28.6%)患者获得非常好结果,1例(14.3%)患者获得一般结果,共6例(85.7%)患者获得满意结果。术后监测期间未发现严重并发症或复发。局限性:这项观察性回顾性研究是基于一个方便的样本,涉及有限数量的患者。结论:经皮内镜切除是治疗腰椎间盘囊肿的一种微创、安全的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信