Improving Teacher-Child Relationships Using Relationship-Focused Reflection: A Case Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rianne J Bosman, Peter F de Jong, Helma M Y Koomen
{"title":"Improving Teacher-Child Relationships Using Relationship-Focused Reflection: A Case Study.","authors":"Rianne J Bosman, Peter F de Jong, Helma M Y Koomen","doi":"10.1177/01632787241250366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling Interactie Coaching in Dutch, or Teacher Student Interaction Coaching), an intervention targeted at teachers' mental representations to improve dyadic teacher-child relationship quality. Four teachers and eight children from Dutch elementary schools participated in this single case study. Teachers themselves selected two children with whom they experienced a difficult relationship. The results indicated that teachers' global judgments of relationship quality improved from pretest to posttest for almost all teacher-child dyads. Day-to-day perceptions of conflict, closeness, and self-efficacy improved for a few teacher-child dyads, and especially for teacher-child dyads of the second targeted child. This implies that LLInC is especially helpful when carried out for at least two teacher-child dyads. The results of this study suggest that LLInC is promising, especially with regard to teachers' global relationship perceptions. However, LLInC should be further evaluated using a larger, representative sample, especially with regard to day-to-day perceptions of relationship quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787241250366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241250366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling Interactie Coaching in Dutch, or Teacher Student Interaction Coaching), an intervention targeted at teachers' mental representations to improve dyadic teacher-child relationship quality. Four teachers and eight children from Dutch elementary schools participated in this single case study. Teachers themselves selected two children with whom they experienced a difficult relationship. The results indicated that teachers' global judgments of relationship quality improved from pretest to posttest for almost all teacher-child dyads. Day-to-day perceptions of conflict, closeness, and self-efficacy improved for a few teacher-child dyads, and especially for teacher-child dyads of the second targeted child. This implies that LLInC is especially helpful when carried out for at least two teacher-child dyads. The results of this study suggest that LLInC is promising, especially with regard to teachers' global relationship perceptions. However, LLInC should be further evaluated using a larger, representative sample, especially with regard to day-to-day perceptions of relationship quality.

运用以关系为中心的反思改善师生关系:个案研究。
本研究评估了LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling interactive Coaching in Dutch,又称师生互动辅导),这是一种针对教师心理表征的干预措施,旨在改善二元师生关系质量。来自荷兰小学的四名教师和八名儿童参与了这个单一的案例研究。老师们自己选择了两个和他们关系不好的孩子。结果表明,几乎所有师生对关系质量的整体判断从测试前到测试后都有所提高。日常冲突、亲密感和自我效能感的感知在一些教师与儿童的组合中有所改善,尤其是在第二个目标儿童的教师与儿童的组合中。这意味着LLInC在对至少两个老师和孩子的父子进行时特别有用。本研究的结果表明,LLInC是有希望的,特别是在教师的全球关系感知方面。然而,LLInC应该使用更大的、有代表性的样本进行进一步评估,特别是关于日常对关系质量的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信