High-content imaging and deep learning-driven detection of infectious bacteria in wounds.

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Ziyi Zhang, Lanmei Gao, Houbing Zheng, Yi Zhong, Gaozheng Li, Zhaoting Ye, Qi Sun, Biao Wang, Zuquan Weng
{"title":"High-content imaging and deep learning-driven detection of infectious bacteria in wounds.","authors":"Ziyi Zhang, Lanmei Gao, Houbing Zheng, Yi Zhong, Gaozheng Li, Zhaoting Ye, Qi Sun, Biao Wang, Zuquan Weng","doi":"10.1007/s00449-024-03110-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fast and accurate detection of infectious bacteria in wounds is crucial for effective clinical treatment. However, traditional methods take over 24 h to yield results, which is inadequate for urgent clinical needs. Here, we introduce a deep learning-driven framework that detects and classifies four bacteria commonly found in wounds: Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), Escherichia coli (EC), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Staphylococcus aureus (SA). This framework leverages the pretrained ResNet50 deep learning architecture, trained on manually collected periodic bacterial colony-growth images from high-content imaging. In in vitro samples, our method achieves a detection rate of over 95% for early colonies cultured for 8 h, reducing detection time by more than 12 h compared to traditional Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved methods. For colony classification, it identifies AB, EC, PA, and SA colonies with accuracies of 96%, 97%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. For mixed bacterial samples, it identifies colonies with 95% accuracy and classifies them with 93% precision. In mouse wound samples, the method identifies over 90% of developing bacterial colonies and classifies colony types with an average accuracy of over 94%. These results highlight the framework's potential for improving the clinical treatment of wound infections. Besides, the framework provides the detection results with key feature visualization, which enhance the prediction credibility for users. To summarize, the proposed framework enables high-throughput identification, significantly reducing detection time and providing a cost-effective tool for early bacterial detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-024-03110-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fast and accurate detection of infectious bacteria in wounds is crucial for effective clinical treatment. However, traditional methods take over 24 h to yield results, which is inadequate for urgent clinical needs. Here, we introduce a deep learning-driven framework that detects and classifies four bacteria commonly found in wounds: Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), Escherichia coli (EC), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Staphylococcus aureus (SA). This framework leverages the pretrained ResNet50 deep learning architecture, trained on manually collected periodic bacterial colony-growth images from high-content imaging. In in vitro samples, our method achieves a detection rate of over 95% for early colonies cultured for 8 h, reducing detection time by more than 12 h compared to traditional Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved methods. For colony classification, it identifies AB, EC, PA, and SA colonies with accuracies of 96%, 97%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. For mixed bacterial samples, it identifies colonies with 95% accuracy and classifies them with 93% precision. In mouse wound samples, the method identifies over 90% of developing bacterial colonies and classifies colony types with an average accuracy of over 94%. These results highlight the framework's potential for improving the clinical treatment of wound infections. Besides, the framework provides the detection results with key feature visualization, which enhance the prediction credibility for users. To summarize, the proposed framework enables high-throughput identification, significantly reducing detection time and providing a cost-effective tool for early bacterial detection.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
147
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes. Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged. The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信