Risk and protective factors for ASF in domestic pigs and wild boar in the EU, and mitigation measures for managing the disease in wild boar

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Anette Ella Boklund, Karl Ståhl, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Tomasz Podgórski, Timothée Vergne, José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Eleonora Cattaneo, Sofie Dhollander, Alexandra Papanikolaou, Stefania Tampach, Lina Mur
{"title":"Risk and protective factors for ASF in domestic pigs and wild boar in the EU, and mitigation measures for managing the disease in wild boar","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),&nbsp;Anette Ella Boklund,&nbsp;Karl Ståhl,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca,&nbsp;Tomasz Podgórski,&nbsp;Timothée Vergne,&nbsp;José Cortiñas Abrahantes,&nbsp;Eleonora Cattaneo,&nbsp;Sofie Dhollander,&nbsp;Alexandra Papanikolaou,&nbsp;Stefania Tampach,&nbsp;Lina Mur","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Five epidemiological aspects of ASF were evaluated using literature reviews, field studies, questionnaires and mathematical models. First, a literature review and a case–control study in commercial pig farms emphasised the importance of biosecurity and farming practices, including the spread of manure around farms and the use of bedding material as risk factors, while the use of insect nets was a protective factor. Second, although wild boar density is a relevant known factor, the statistical and mechanistic models did not show a clear and consistent effect of wild boar density on ASF epidemiology in the selected scenarios. Other factors, such as vegetation, altitude, climate and barriers affecting population connectivity, also played a role on ASF epidemiology in wild boar. Third, knowledge on <i>Ornithodoros erraticus</i> competence, presence and surveillance was updated concluding that this species did not play any role in the current ASF epidemic in affected areas of the EU. Available scientific evidence suggests that stable flies and horse flies are exposed to ASFV in affected areas of the EU and have the capacity to introduce ASFV into farms and transmit it to pigs. However, there is uncertainty about whether this occurs, and if so, to what extent. Fourth, research and field experience from affected countries in the EU demonstrates that the use of fences, potentially used with existing road infrastructure, coupled with other control methods such as culling and carcass removal, can effectively reduce wild boar movements contributing to ASF management in wild boar. Fences can contribute to control ASF in both scenarios, focal introductions and wave-like spread. Fifth, the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) vaccines as an immune contraceptive has the potential, as a complementary tool, to reduce and control wild boar populations. However, the development of an oral GnRH vaccine for wild boar still requires substantial additional work.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"22 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five epidemiological aspects of ASF were evaluated using literature reviews, field studies, questionnaires and mathematical models. First, a literature review and a case–control study in commercial pig farms emphasised the importance of biosecurity and farming practices, including the spread of manure around farms and the use of bedding material as risk factors, while the use of insect nets was a protective factor. Second, although wild boar density is a relevant known factor, the statistical and mechanistic models did not show a clear and consistent effect of wild boar density on ASF epidemiology in the selected scenarios. Other factors, such as vegetation, altitude, climate and barriers affecting population connectivity, also played a role on ASF epidemiology in wild boar. Third, knowledge on Ornithodoros erraticus competence, presence and surveillance was updated concluding that this species did not play any role in the current ASF epidemic in affected areas of the EU. Available scientific evidence suggests that stable flies and horse flies are exposed to ASFV in affected areas of the EU and have the capacity to introduce ASFV into farms and transmit it to pigs. However, there is uncertainty about whether this occurs, and if so, to what extent. Fourth, research and field experience from affected countries in the EU demonstrates that the use of fences, potentially used with existing road infrastructure, coupled with other control methods such as culling and carcass removal, can effectively reduce wild boar movements contributing to ASF management in wild boar. Fences can contribute to control ASF in both scenarios, focal introductions and wave-like spread. Fifth, the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) vaccines as an immune contraceptive has the potential, as a complementary tool, to reduce and control wild boar populations. However, the development of an oral GnRH vaccine for wild boar still requires substantial additional work.

Abstract Image

欧盟家猪和野猪非洲猪瘟的风险和保护因素,以及管理野猪疾病的缓解措施
采用文献综述、实地调查、问卷调查和数学模型对非洲猪瘟的五个流行病学方面进行评价。首先,一项文献综述和一项商业养猪场的病例对照研究强调了生物安全和养殖实践的重要性,包括在猪场周围散布粪便和使用床上材料作为风险因素,而使用防虫网是一个保护因素。其次,虽然野猪密度是一个相关的已知因素,但统计和机制模型并没有显示野猪密度在选定情景中对非洲猪瘟流行病学的明确和一致的影响。其他因素,如植被、海拔、气候和影响种群连通性的障碍,也对野猪的ASF流行病学起作用。第三,更新了关于不稳定鸟的能力、存在和监测的知识,得出结论认为该物种在当前欧盟疫区的非洲猪瘟流行中没有发挥任何作用。现有的科学证据表明,在欧盟疫区,马厩蝇和马蝇接触过非洲猪瘟病毒,有能力将非洲猪瘟病毒引入农场并传播给猪。然而,这种情况是否会发生,以及如果发生,会到什么程度,还存在不确定性。第四,来自欧盟受影响国家的研究和实地经验表明,使用围栏(可能与现有道路基础设施结合使用),再加上其他控制方法,如扑杀和胴体移除,可以有效减少野猪的流动,有助于管理野猪的非洲猪瘟。围栏在两种情况下都有助于控制非洲猪瘟,即焦点引入和波状传播。第五,使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)疫苗作为一种免疫避孕药,作为一种补充工具,有可能减少和控制野猪种群。然而,开发一种用于野猪的口服GnRH疫苗仍然需要大量的额外工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信