The business case for demographic diversity in strategic leadership teams: A systematic and critical review of the causal evidence

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jost Sieweke , Tanja Hentschel , Brooke A. Gazdag , Levke Henningsen
{"title":"The business case for demographic diversity in strategic leadership teams: A systematic and critical review of the causal evidence","authors":"Jost Sieweke ,&nbsp;Tanja Hentschel ,&nbsp;Brooke A. Gazdag ,&nbsp;Levke Henningsen","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Demographic diversity (e.g., gender, age, race, ethnicity) in strategic leadership teams (i.e., boards of directors and top management teams) has received global attention recently. Policymakers have promoted diversity policies by citing the “business case” for diversity that suggests a positive (causal) effect on firm performance. Our focus is twofold: First, we systematically evaluate the methodological rigor of 64 studies on the relationship between strategic leadership team demographic diversity and firm performance (1994–2023) from Financial Times (FT) 50 journals, finding that ca. 70 percent show implausible causal effects, ca. 20 percent lack sufficient information, and only 11 percent (N = 7) demonstrate plausible causal effects. Second, we synthesize research findings of the seven studies. The five studies on gender diversity yield mixed results: some report positive or negative effects, whereas the majority finds no effects on firm performance. Regarding ancestral and genetic diversity, the studies support the business case argument. Overall, our review provides three key insights: (1) a critical evaluation of the causal evidence regarding the business case for demographic diversity in strategic leadership teams, (2) a synthesis of the research findings by focusing on rigorously conducted studies, and (3) hands-on recommendations for refining future approaches for causal research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 1","pages":"Article 101843"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demographic diversity (e.g., gender, age, race, ethnicity) in strategic leadership teams (i.e., boards of directors and top management teams) has received global attention recently. Policymakers have promoted diversity policies by citing the “business case” for diversity that suggests a positive (causal) effect on firm performance. Our focus is twofold: First, we systematically evaluate the methodological rigor of 64 studies on the relationship between strategic leadership team demographic diversity and firm performance (1994–2023) from Financial Times (FT) 50 journals, finding that ca. 70 percent show implausible causal effects, ca. 20 percent lack sufficient information, and only 11 percent (N = 7) demonstrate plausible causal effects. Second, we synthesize research findings of the seven studies. The five studies on gender diversity yield mixed results: some report positive or negative effects, whereas the majority finds no effects on firm performance. Regarding ancestral and genetic diversity, the studies support the business case argument. Overall, our review provides three key insights: (1) a critical evaluation of the causal evidence regarding the business case for demographic diversity in strategic leadership teams, (2) a synthesis of the research findings by focusing on rigorously conducted studies, and (3) hands-on recommendations for refining future approaches for causal research.
战略领导团队中人口多样性的商业案例:对因果证据的系统和批判性审查
战略领导团队(即董事会和高层管理团队)中的人口多样性(如性别、年龄、种族、民族)最近受到了全球的关注。政策制定者通过引用多元化的“商业案例”来推动多元化政策,该“商业案例”表明多元化对公司绩效有积极(因果)影响。我们的重点是双重的:首先,我们系统地评估了金融时报(FT) 50种期刊上关于战略领导团队人口多样性与公司绩效之间关系的64项研究(1994-2023)的方法严谨性,发现约70%的研究显示不可信的因果关系,约20%缺乏足够的信息,只有11% (N = 7)显示可信的因果关系。其次,综合七项研究的研究成果。关于性别多样性的五项研究得出了不同的结果:一些研究报告了积极或消极的影响,而大多数研究发现对公司业绩没有影响。关于祖先和遗传多样性,这些研究支持商业案例的论点。总体而言,我们的综述提供了三个关键见解:(1)对战略领导团队中人口多样性商业案例的因果证据进行批判性评估,(2)通过专注于严格进行的研究来综合研究结果,以及(3)为改进未来因果研究方法提供实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信