Structural MRI of brain similarity networks

IF 28.7 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Isaac Sebenius, Lena Dorfschmidt, Jakob Seidlitz, Aaron Alexander-Bloch, Sarah E. Morgan, Edward Bullmore
{"title":"Structural MRI of brain similarity networks","authors":"Isaac Sebenius, Lena Dorfschmidt, Jakob Seidlitz, Aaron Alexander-Bloch, Sarah E. Morgan, Edward Bullmore","doi":"10.1038/s41583-024-00882-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in structural MRI analytics now allow the network organization of individual brains to be comprehensively mapped through the use of the biologically principled metric of anatomical similarity. In this Review, we offer an overview of the measurement and meaning of structural MRI similarity, especially in relation to two key assumptions that often underlie its interpretation: (i) that MRI similarity can be representative of architectonic similarity between cortical areas and (ii) that similar areas are more likely to be axonally connected, as predicted by the homophily principle. We first introduce the historical roots and technical foundations of MRI similarity analysis and compare it with the distinct MRI techniques of structural covariance and tractography analysis. We contextualize this empirical work with two generative models of homophilic networks: an economic model of cost-constrained connectional homophily and a heterochronic model of ontogenetically phased cortical maturation. We then review (i) studies of the genetic and transcriptional architecture of MRI similarity in population-averaged and disorder-specific contexts and (ii) developmental studies of normative cohorts and clinical studies of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Finally, we prioritize knowledge gaps that must be addressed to consolidate structural MRI similarity as an accessible, valid marker of the architecture and connectivity of an individual brain network. Through use of the anatomical similarity, structural MRI analytics are now enabling the network organization of individual brains to be mapped. In this Review, Sebenius, Dorfschmidt et al. examine this field of structural MRI similarity network analysis.","PeriodicalId":49142,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","volume":"26 1","pages":"42-59"},"PeriodicalIF":28.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-024-00882-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in structural MRI analytics now allow the network organization of individual brains to be comprehensively mapped through the use of the biologically principled metric of anatomical similarity. In this Review, we offer an overview of the measurement and meaning of structural MRI similarity, especially in relation to two key assumptions that often underlie its interpretation: (i) that MRI similarity can be representative of architectonic similarity between cortical areas and (ii) that similar areas are more likely to be axonally connected, as predicted by the homophily principle. We first introduce the historical roots and technical foundations of MRI similarity analysis and compare it with the distinct MRI techniques of structural covariance and tractography analysis. We contextualize this empirical work with two generative models of homophilic networks: an economic model of cost-constrained connectional homophily and a heterochronic model of ontogenetically phased cortical maturation. We then review (i) studies of the genetic and transcriptional architecture of MRI similarity in population-averaged and disorder-specific contexts and (ii) developmental studies of normative cohorts and clinical studies of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Finally, we prioritize knowledge gaps that must be addressed to consolidate structural MRI similarity as an accessible, valid marker of the architecture and connectivity of an individual brain network. Through use of the anatomical similarity, structural MRI analytics are now enabling the network organization of individual brains to be mapped. In this Review, Sebenius, Dorfschmidt et al. examine this field of structural MRI similarity network analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大脑相似性网络的结构磁共振成像
结构性核磁共振成像分析技术的最新进展现在可以通过使用解剖学相似性这一生物学原理上的度量标准来全面绘制个体大脑的网络组织图。在这篇综述中,我们将概述结构性 MRI 相似性的测量方法和意义,尤其是与通常作为其解释基础的两个关键假设有关的内容:(i) MRI 相似性可以代表皮质区域之间的结构相似性;(ii) 正如同质性原理所预测的那样,相似区域更有可能轴突相连。我们首先介绍了核磁共振成像相似性分析的历史渊源和技术基础,并将其与结构协方差和束图分析等不同的核磁共振成像技术进行了比较。我们将这一实证工作与同亲网络的两个生成模型联系起来:一个是成本受限的连接同亲经济模型,另一个是本体分期皮层成熟的异时模型。然后,我们回顾了:(i) MRI 相似性的遗传和转录结构在人群平均水平和特定疾病背景下的研究;(ii) 正常队列的发育研究以及神经发育和神经退行性疾病的临床研究。最后,我们列出了必须优先解决的知识缺口,以巩固磁共振成像结构相似性作为个体大脑网络结构和连接性的可访问有效标记的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.60%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Neuroscience is a multidisciplinary journal that covers various fields within neuroscience, aiming to offer a comprehensive understanding of the structure and function of the central nervous system. Advances in molecular, developmental, and cognitive neuroscience, facilitated by powerful experimental techniques and theoretical approaches, have made enduring neurobiological questions more accessible. Nature Reviews Neuroscience serves as a reliable and accessible resource, addressing the breadth and depth of modern neuroscience. It acts as an authoritative and engaging reference for scientists interested in all aspects of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信