Latency and amplitude of catch-up saccades to accelerating targets.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1152/jn.00123.2024
Sydney Doré, Jonathan Coutinho, Aarlenne Z Khan, Philippe Lefèvre, Gunnar Blohm
{"title":"Latency and amplitude of catch-up saccades to accelerating targets.","authors":"Sydney Doré, Jonathan Coutinho, Aarlenne Z Khan, Philippe Lefèvre, Gunnar Blohm","doi":"10.1152/jn.00123.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To track moving targets, humans move their eyes using both saccades and smooth pursuit. If pursuit eye movements fail to accurately track the moving target, catch-up saccades are initiated to rectify the tracking error. It is well known that retinal position and velocity errors determine saccade latency and amplitude, but the extent to which retinal acceleration error influences these aspects is not well quantified. To test this, 13 adult human participants performed an experiment where they pursued accelerating/decelerating targets. During the ongoing pursuit, we introduced a randomly sized target step to evoke a catch-up saccade and analyzed its latency and amplitude. We observed that retinal acceleration error (computed over a 200 ms range centered 100 ms before the saccade) was a statistically significant predictor of saccade amplitude and latency. A multiple linear regression supported our hypothesis that retinal acceleration errors influence saccade amplitude in addition to the influence of retinal position and velocity errors. We also found that saccade latencies were shorter when retinal acceleration error increased the tracking error and vice versa. In summary, our findings support a model in which retinal acceleration error is used to compute a predicted position error ∼100 ms into the future to trigger saccades and determine saccade amplitude.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> When visually tracking object motion, humans combine smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements to maintain the target image on the fovea. Retinal position and velocity errors are known to determine catch-up saccade amplitude and latency, however, it is unknown if retinal acceleration error is also used to predict future target position. This study provides evidence of a small but statistically significant contribution of retinal acceleration error in determining saccade amplitude and latency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00123.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To track moving targets, humans move their eyes using both saccades and smooth pursuit. If pursuit eye movements fail to accurately track the moving target, catch-up saccades are initiated to rectify the tracking error. It is well known that retinal position and velocity errors determine saccade latency and amplitude, but the extent to which retinal acceleration error influences these aspects is not well quantified. To test this, 13 adult human participants performed an experiment where they pursued accelerating/decelerating targets. During the ongoing pursuit, we introduced a randomly sized target step to evoke a catch-up saccade and analyzed its latency and amplitude. We observed that retinal acceleration error (computed over a 200 ms range centered 100 ms before the saccade) was a statistically significant predictor of saccade amplitude and latency. A multiple linear regression supported our hypothesis that retinal acceleration errors influence saccade amplitude in addition to the influence of retinal position and velocity errors. We also found that saccade latencies were shorter when retinal acceleration error increased the tracking error and vice versa. In summary, our findings support a model in which retinal acceleration error is used to compute a predicted position error ∼100 ms into the future to trigger saccades and determine saccade amplitude.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When visually tracking object motion, humans combine smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements to maintain the target image on the fovea. Retinal position and velocity errors are known to determine catch-up saccade amplitude and latency, however, it is unknown if retinal acceleration error is also used to predict future target position. This study provides evidence of a small but statistically significant contribution of retinal acceleration error in determining saccade amplitude and latency.

对加速目标的追赶性慢动作的延迟和振幅。
为了跟踪移动目标,人类会同时使用眼球移动和平滑追随来移动眼球。如果追随眼球运动无法准确跟踪移动目标,就会启动追赶眼球运动来纠正跟踪误差。众所周知,视网膜位置和速度误差决定了囊状移动的延迟和幅度,但视网膜加速度误差对这些方面的影响程度还没有很好地量化。为了测试这一点,13 名成年人类参与者进行了一项实验,他们追逐加速/减速目标。在追逐过程中,我们引入了一个随机大小的目标台阶来唤起追赶囊回,并分析了其延迟和振幅。我们观察到,视网膜加速度误差(在以囊回前 100 毫秒为中心的 200 毫秒范围内计算)对囊回幅度和延迟有显著的统计学预测作用。多元线性回归支持我们的假设,即视网膜加速度误差除了影响视网膜位置和速度误差外,还影响囊回幅度。我们还发现,当视网膜加速度误差增加跟踪误差时,囊回延迟较短,反之亦然。总之,我们的研究结果支持这样一个模型,即视网膜加速度误差用于计算未来 100 毫秒内的预测位置误差,从而触发囊回并决定囊回幅度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信