The Effects of Using AI Tools on Critical Thinking in English Literature Classes Among EFL Learners: An Intervention Study

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wenxia Liu, Yunsong Wang
{"title":"The Effects of Using AI Tools on Critical Thinking in English Literature Classes Among EFL Learners: An Intervention Study","authors":"Wenxia Liu,&nbsp;Yunsong Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven learning has become an irreversible trend in foreign language education. Scholars are increasingly focusing on this field, yet few have examined its impact within English literature classes. To fill this gap, we designed an 8-week intervention study with mixed methods and recruited 90 students, with 42 in the experimental group and 48 in the control group, matched for average age, English proficiency and gender ratio. Critical thinking levels were measured before and after the intervention using a standardised assessment tool. In the experimental group, students used AI tools (ChatGPT-3.5, Bodoudou, SummarizBot, etc.) to generate and answer text-related questions, and participate in interactive quizzes and AI-assisted debates during classes, while the control group followed traditional methods without AI tools. The findings revealed a statistically significant improvement in the critical thinking skills of the experimental group compared to the control group, as measured by pre and postintervention assessments (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). This suggests that AI tools can effectively enhance critical thinking abilities in English literature classes. This study not only contributes to the emerging discourse on AI in education but also offers practical implications for integrating AI technologies to support and enrich the learning experiences of EFL students in literature classes. The findings have the potential to guide educators and policymakers in designing AI-driven educational strategies that are culturally responsive and pedagogically effective.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"59 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven learning has become an irreversible trend in foreign language education. Scholars are increasingly focusing on this field, yet few have examined its impact within English literature classes. To fill this gap, we designed an 8-week intervention study with mixed methods and recruited 90 students, with 42 in the experimental group and 48 in the control group, matched for average age, English proficiency and gender ratio. Critical thinking levels were measured before and after the intervention using a standardised assessment tool. In the experimental group, students used AI tools (ChatGPT-3.5, Bodoudou, SummarizBot, etc.) to generate and answer text-related questions, and participate in interactive quizzes and AI-assisted debates during classes, while the control group followed traditional methods without AI tools. The findings revealed a statistically significant improvement in the critical thinking skills of the experimental group compared to the control group, as measured by pre and postintervention assessments (p < 0.05). This suggests that AI tools can effectively enhance critical thinking abilities in English literature classes. This study not only contributes to the emerging discourse on AI in education but also offers practical implications for integrating AI technologies to support and enrich the learning experiences of EFL students in literature classes. The findings have the potential to guide educators and policymakers in designing AI-driven educational strategies that are culturally responsive and pedagogically effective.

在英语语言学习者的英语文学课上使用人工智能工具对批判性思维的影响:干预研究
人工智能(AI)驱动的学习已成为外语教育不可逆转的趋势。越来越多的学者开始关注这一领域,但很少有人研究过它对英语文学课的影响。为了填补这一空白,我们采用混合方法设计了一项为期 8 周的干预研究,并招募了 90 名学生,其中实验组 42 人,对照组 48 人,两组学生的平均年龄、英语水平和性别比例相匹配。使用标准化的评估工具对干预前后的批判性思维水平进行测量。在实验组中,学生使用人工智能工具(ChatGPT-3.5、Bodoudou、SummarizBot 等)生成和回答与文本相关的问题,并在课堂上参与互动测验和人工智能辅助辩论,而对照组则采用传统方法,不使用人工智能工具。研究结果表明,通过干预前后的评估,实验组与对照组相比,批判性思维能力有了显著提高(p <0.05)。这表明,人工智能工具可以有效提高英语文学课上的批判性思维能力。这项研究不仅为人工智能在教育领域的新兴讨论做出了贡献,还为整合人工智能技术以支持和丰富英语语言学生在文学课上的学习体验提供了实际意义。研究结果有可能指导教育工作者和政策制定者设计以人工智能为驱动的教育策略,这些策略应具有文化响应性和教学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信