Investigating learner characteristics and processes in Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure to design adaptive guidance

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Charleen Brand , Christian Hartmann , Katharina Loibl , Nikol Rummel
{"title":"Investigating learner characteristics and processes in Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure to design adaptive guidance","authors":"Charleen Brand ,&nbsp;Christian Hartmann ,&nbsp;Katharina Loibl ,&nbsp;Nikol Rummel","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We investigate learner characteristics and learning processes in two instructional designs with preparatory activities prior to instruction: Productive Failure (PF) and Vicarious Failure (VF). The aim is to develop a first theoretical understanding of PF and VF learners that can inform directions for the design of adaptive support.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on an experimental study with 110 secondary school students in mathematics, we examine the effect of students’ learner characteristics in PF (students generating own solution attempts) and VF (students studying these attempts). We assess the learning processes based on think-aloud data from 15 PF-VF-model-observer-pairs, analyzing frequencies and sequences of cognitive processes, using the HeuristicsMiner algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mathematical ability was related to PF and VF students' learning, prior knowledge and mathematical self-concept to their learning processes. While both groups showed large overlaps in the frequencies and sequences of learning processes, VF students displayed a more analytical and PF students a more solution-oriented approach to the task. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior was relevant for VF students’ learning, depending on prior knowledge and ability. For PF students, it depended on mathematical self-concept.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PF and VF students’ learning as well as frequencies and sequences of their learning processes relates to cognitive and affective learner characteristics. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior may require adaptive guidance specifically for learners with low mathematical self-concept in PF or prior knowledge and ability in VF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102052"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001798","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We investigate learner characteristics and learning processes in two instructional designs with preparatory activities prior to instruction: Productive Failure (PF) and Vicarious Failure (VF). The aim is to develop a first theoretical understanding of PF and VF learners that can inform directions for the design of adaptive support.

Methods

Based on an experimental study with 110 secondary school students in mathematics, we examine the effect of students’ learner characteristics in PF (students generating own solution attempts) and VF (students studying these attempts). We assess the learning processes based on think-aloud data from 15 PF-VF-model-observer-pairs, analyzing frequencies and sequences of cognitive processes, using the HeuristicsMiner algorithm.

Results

Mathematical ability was related to PF and VF students' learning, prior knowledge and mathematical self-concept to their learning processes. While both groups showed large overlaps in the frequencies and sequences of learning processes, VF students displayed a more analytical and PF students a more solution-oriented approach to the task. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior was relevant for VF students’ learning, depending on prior knowledge and ability. For PF students, it depended on mathematical self-concept.

Conclusions

PF and VF students’ learning as well as frequencies and sequences of their learning processes relates to cognitive and affective learner characteristics. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior may require adaptive guidance specifically for learners with low mathematical self-concept in PF or prior knowledge and ability in VF.
调查 "生产性失败 "和 "模仿性失败 "中学习者的特征和过程,以设计适应性指导
背景我们研究了两种教学设计中的学习者特征和学习过程,这两种设计在教学前都有准备活动:生产性失败(PF)和模仿性失败(VF)。方法基于一项对 110 名中学生进行的数学实验研究,我们考察了学生的学习者特征在 PF(学生自己生成解决方案尝试)和 VF(学生研究这些尝试)中的影响。我们根据 15 对 PF-VF 模型-观察者的思考-朗读数据对学习过程进行了评估,并使用 HeuristicsMiner 算法分析了认知过程的频率和顺序。结果 数学能力与 PF 和 VF 学生的学习有关,先验知识和数学自我概念与他们的学习过程有关。虽然两组学生在学习过程的频率和顺序上有很大的重叠,但 VF 组学生在完成任务时更注重分析,而 PF 组学生更注重解决问题。元认知的规划和评价行为与 VF 学生的学习相关,这取决于先前的知识和能力。结论PF 和 VF 学生的学习及其学习过程的频率和顺序与学习者的认知和情感特征有关。元认知计划和评价行为可能需要适应性指导,特别是对于数学自我概念较低的 PF 学生或已有知识和能力的 VF 学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信