Developing the critical thinking skills of first year accounting students with an active learning intervention

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Mareli Rossouw, Gretha Steenkamp
{"title":"Developing the critical thinking skills of first year accounting students with an active learning intervention","authors":"Mareli Rossouw,&nbsp;Gretha Steenkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Business graduates need advanced critical thinking abilities. Critical thinking is best taught as part of the core technical business curriculum and preferably early in the academic programme. Using action research, the researchers designed and tested the effectiveness of an intervention which sought to develop first-year accounting students' critical thinking abilities as part of their core curriculum. The intervention included explicit teaching on critical thinking in accounting and various active learning exercises (both in the classroom and after class), using a flipped classroom approach, simulations, reflection, real-life or practical examples and student feedback. All 459 registered students were exposed to the critical thinking intervention, and evidence of enhanced student engagement was noted. The effectiveness of the intervention was tested using a one-group pre-test-post-test pre-experimental design, using an accounting-related custom-designed critical thinking measurement tool. A total of 95 pre-test and 72 post-test student responses were statistically analysed (voluntary participation in the study reduced the number of participants below the 459 registered students). Participants' critical thinking scores showed a significant increase (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) after the critical thinking intervention, indicating that the intervention was effective and that it is possible to develop first-year students’ critical thinking skills by engaging them in specialised active learning exercises. The unique value of our findings lie in detailing the intervention (which other business educators could employ when including similar interventions in their core modules), developing and piloting the accounting-related critical thinking measurement tool and using the tool (and other methods) to show that the intervention was effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"23 1","pages":"Article 101086"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business graduates need advanced critical thinking abilities. Critical thinking is best taught as part of the core technical business curriculum and preferably early in the academic programme. Using action research, the researchers designed and tested the effectiveness of an intervention which sought to develop first-year accounting students' critical thinking abilities as part of their core curriculum. The intervention included explicit teaching on critical thinking in accounting and various active learning exercises (both in the classroom and after class), using a flipped classroom approach, simulations, reflection, real-life or practical examples and student feedback. All 459 registered students were exposed to the critical thinking intervention, and evidence of enhanced student engagement was noted. The effectiveness of the intervention was tested using a one-group pre-test-post-test pre-experimental design, using an accounting-related custom-designed critical thinking measurement tool. A total of 95 pre-test and 72 post-test student responses were statistically analysed (voluntary participation in the study reduced the number of participants below the 459 registered students). Participants' critical thinking scores showed a significant increase (p < 0.01) after the critical thinking intervention, indicating that the intervention was effective and that it is possible to develop first-year students’ critical thinking skills by engaging them in specialised active learning exercises. The unique value of our findings lie in detailing the intervention (which other business educators could employ when including similar interventions in their core modules), developing and piloting the accounting-related critical thinking measurement tool and using the tool (and other methods) to show that the intervention was effective.
通过主动学习干预培养会计专业一年级学生的批判性思维能力
商科毕业生需要高级批判性思维能力。批判性思维最好是作为核心技术商业课程的一部分来教授,而且最好是在学术课程的早期。研究人员采用行动研究法,设计并测试了一项干预措施的有效性,该措施旨在培养会计专业一年级学生的批判性思维能力,作为其核心课程的一部分。干预措施包括关于会计批判性思维的明确教学和各种主动学习练习(课堂和课后),采用翻转课堂方法、模拟、反思、真实生活或实际案例和学生反馈。所有 459 名注册学生都接受了批判性思维干预,有证据表明学生的参与度有所提高。干预措施的有效性采用了单组预实验-后实验-预实验设计,并使用了与会计相关的定制设计的批判性思维测量工具。共对 95 名前测和 72 名后测学生的回答进行了统计分析(自愿参与研究的学生人数低于 459 名注册学生)。在批判性思维干预后,参与者的批判性思维得分有了显著提高(p < 0.01),这表明干预是有效的,通过让一年级学生参与专门的主动学习练习,培养他们的批判性思维能力是可能的。我们的研究结果的独特价值在于详细介绍了干预措施(其他商科教育工作者在核心模块中加入类似干预措施时可以采用),开发并试用了与会计相关的批判性思维测量工具,并使用该工具(及其他方法)来证明干预措施是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信