Enhancing energy savings verification in industrial settings using deep learning and anomaly detection within the IPMVP framework

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Suziee Sukarti , Mohamad Fani Sulaima , Aida Fazliana Abdul Kadir , Nur Izyan Zulkafli , Mohammad Lutfi Othman , Dawid P. Hanak
{"title":"Enhancing energy savings verification in industrial settings using deep learning and anomaly detection within the IPMVP framework","authors":"Suziee Sukarti ,&nbsp;Mohamad Fani Sulaima ,&nbsp;Aida Fazliana Abdul Kadir ,&nbsp;Nur Izyan Zulkafli ,&nbsp;Mohammad Lutfi Othman ,&nbsp;Dawid P. Hanak","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study advances industrial energy Measurement and Verification (M&amp;V) practices by integrating Deep Learning (DL) techniques with automated anomaly detection, challenging traditional M&amp;V reliance on manual non-routine adjustments. The research explores whether automated, data-driven anomaly detection can replace these adjustments, enhancing accuracy and efficiency in energy savings verification post-energy conservation measures (ECMs)—a critical need for industrial applications. Utilizing a dataset with 30-minute to weekly interval readings, CNN, DNN, and RNN models were applied across 12 datasets to identify the most effective model for baseline prediction using key IPMVP performance metrics (CVRMSE, NMBE, R2) alongside MAPE and RMSE. The baseline modelling findings indicate that DNN performs optimally at 30-minute intervals (R2 = 0.9600, RMSE = 22.82), hourly intervals (R2 = 0.9581, RMSE = 23.27), and daily intervals (R2 = 0.9347, RMSE = 28.00). CNN, however, demonstrated the best performance for weekly intervals (R2 = 0.8875, RMSE = 31.91). DNN provides the best overall performance across most intervals, offering a reliable balance of accuracy and practicality for regular energy baseline prediction. For anomaly detection and savings impact, the 30-minute RNN model achieved the highest estimated savings of 4.38 million kWh which translates to 27.35 % of the total energy consumption of 16,000,000 kWh with a low standard error (0.634 kWh), demonstrating strong predictive precision. Across all frequencies, savings estimates exceeded twice the standard error, meeting IPMVP acceptability criteria and confirming the robustness of this approach. These findings substantiate that deep learning-based anomaly detection can effectively replace traditional non-routine adjustments, providing a reliable, streamlined solution for energy savings calculations. Visualizations within the study illustrate the model’s enhancements, with comparative charts showing both original and anomaly-adjusted energy consumption and savings. This study contributes to the M&amp;V field by demonstrating that, when integrated into the IPMVP framework, anomaly detection offers an efficient and accurate method for energy savings verification, paving the way for more streamlined, data-driven M&amp;V processes in industrial settings. Additionally, it provides insights into optimizing deep learning models for energy data analysis, supporting quicker, more precise energy management decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 115096"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882401212X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study advances industrial energy Measurement and Verification (M&V) practices by integrating Deep Learning (DL) techniques with automated anomaly detection, challenging traditional M&V reliance on manual non-routine adjustments. The research explores whether automated, data-driven anomaly detection can replace these adjustments, enhancing accuracy and efficiency in energy savings verification post-energy conservation measures (ECMs)—a critical need for industrial applications. Utilizing a dataset with 30-minute to weekly interval readings, CNN, DNN, and RNN models were applied across 12 datasets to identify the most effective model for baseline prediction using key IPMVP performance metrics (CVRMSE, NMBE, R2) alongside MAPE and RMSE. The baseline modelling findings indicate that DNN performs optimally at 30-minute intervals (R2 = 0.9600, RMSE = 22.82), hourly intervals (R2 = 0.9581, RMSE = 23.27), and daily intervals (R2 = 0.9347, RMSE = 28.00). CNN, however, demonstrated the best performance for weekly intervals (R2 = 0.8875, RMSE = 31.91). DNN provides the best overall performance across most intervals, offering a reliable balance of accuracy and practicality for regular energy baseline prediction. For anomaly detection and savings impact, the 30-minute RNN model achieved the highest estimated savings of 4.38 million kWh which translates to 27.35 % of the total energy consumption of 16,000,000 kWh with a low standard error (0.634 kWh), demonstrating strong predictive precision. Across all frequencies, savings estimates exceeded twice the standard error, meeting IPMVP acceptability criteria and confirming the robustness of this approach. These findings substantiate that deep learning-based anomaly detection can effectively replace traditional non-routine adjustments, providing a reliable, streamlined solution for energy savings calculations. Visualizations within the study illustrate the model’s enhancements, with comparative charts showing both original and anomaly-adjusted energy consumption and savings. This study contributes to the M&V field by demonstrating that, when integrated into the IPMVP framework, anomaly detection offers an efficient and accurate method for energy savings verification, paving the way for more streamlined, data-driven M&V processes in industrial settings. Additionally, it provides insights into optimizing deep learning models for energy data analysis, supporting quicker, more precise energy management decisions.
在 IPMVP 框架内利用深度学习和异常检测加强工业环境中的节能验证
本研究将深度学习(DL)技术与自动异常检测相结合,挑战传统 M&V 对人工非例行调整的依赖,从而推进工业能源测量与验证(M&V)实践。该研究探讨了数据驱动的自动异常检测能否取代这些调整,从而提高节能措施(ECM)后节能验证的准确性和效率--这正是工业应用的关键需求。利用 30 分钟到每周间隔读数的数据集,在 12 个数据集中应用了 CNN、DNN 和 RNN 模型,使用关键 IPMVP 性能指标(CVRMSE、NMBE、R2)以及 MAPE 和 RMSE,确定最有效的基线预测模型。基线建模结果表明,DNN 在 30 分钟间隔(R2 = 0.9600,RMSE = 22.82)、每小时间隔(R2 = 0.9581,RMSE = 23.27)和每天间隔(R2 = 0.9347,RMSE = 28.00)时表现最佳。然而,CNN 在周时间间隔上表现最佳(R2 = 0.8875,RMSE = 31.91)。DNN 在大多数时间间隔内都具有最佳的整体性能,在准确性和实用性之间取得了可靠的平衡,可用于定期能源基线预测。在异常检测和节电影响方面,30 分钟 RNN 模型的节电估计值最高,达到 438 万千瓦时,相当于 16,000,000 千瓦时总能耗的 27.35%,标准误差(0.634 千瓦时)较低,显示出较高的预测精度。在所有频率中,节能估算值都超过了标准误差的两倍,符合 IPMVP 的可接受性标准,证实了这种方法的稳健性。这些研究结果证明,基于深度学习的异常检测可以有效取代传统的非例行调整,为节能计算提供可靠、简化的解决方案。研究中的可视化图表说明了模型的增强功能,对比图表显示了原始和异常调整后的能耗和节能效果。这项研究表明,将异常检测集成到 IPMVP 框架中,可为节能验证提供高效、准确的方法,为工业环境中更简化、数据驱动的 M&V 流程铺平道路,从而为 M&V 领域做出了贡献。此外,它还为优化能源数据分析的深度学习模型提供了见解,从而支持更快、更精确的能源管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信