Consumer Preferences for Low-Methane Beef: The Impact of Pre-Purchase Information, Point-of-Purchase Labels, and Increasing Prices

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Kelly A. Davidson , Brandon R. McFadden , Sarah Meyer , John C. Bernard
{"title":"Consumer Preferences for Low-Methane Beef: The Impact of Pre-Purchase Information, Point-of-Purchase Labels, and Increasing Prices","authors":"Kelly A. Davidson ,&nbsp;Brandon R. McFadden ,&nbsp;Sarah Meyer ,&nbsp;John C. Bernard","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cattle production is estimated to be the largest methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emitter associated with consumer demand in the United States of America (U.S.). With a national commitment to reducing methane emissions by 30% before 2030, methane-reducing additives (MRAs) in livestock feed are being explored as a viable solution. This study investigated consumer preferences for low-methane ground beef produced using one of three MRAs with varying levels of methane mitigation: <em>Aspagopsis taxiformis</em> (seaweed), the organic compound <em>3-nitroxypropanol</em> (3NOP), or a blend of essential oils (e.g. garlic extract and citrus). In a nationally representative survey, 3,009 respondents completed a labeled discrete choice experiment used to estimate preferences, WTP, and market shares for conventional and low-methane ground beef. Randomized groups were given pre-purchase information about methane emissions from beef production and point-of-purchase labels communicating the methane reduction levels for each MRA. Given the contemporaneous rise in beef prices, respondents were randomized between a low and high-price group to examine the sensitivity of results. While conventional ground beef was generally preferred, consumer WTP and average market shares for the seaweed MRA product (the MRA with the highest methane reduction potential) surpassed conventional beef for the group that received pre-purchase and point-of-purchase information. Information added more utility and was more effective in the low-price group. Government policies that incentivize the adoption of a seaweed MRA could aid in meeting climate goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102768"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cattle production is estimated to be the largest methane (CH4) emitter associated with consumer demand in the United States of America (U.S.). With a national commitment to reducing methane emissions by 30% before 2030, methane-reducing additives (MRAs) in livestock feed are being explored as a viable solution. This study investigated consumer preferences for low-methane ground beef produced using one of three MRAs with varying levels of methane mitigation: Aspagopsis taxiformis (seaweed), the organic compound 3-nitroxypropanol (3NOP), or a blend of essential oils (e.g. garlic extract and citrus). In a nationally representative survey, 3,009 respondents completed a labeled discrete choice experiment used to estimate preferences, WTP, and market shares for conventional and low-methane ground beef. Randomized groups were given pre-purchase information about methane emissions from beef production and point-of-purchase labels communicating the methane reduction levels for each MRA. Given the contemporaneous rise in beef prices, respondents were randomized between a low and high-price group to examine the sensitivity of results. While conventional ground beef was generally preferred, consumer WTP and average market shares for the seaweed MRA product (the MRA with the highest methane reduction potential) surpassed conventional beef for the group that received pre-purchase and point-of-purchase information. Information added more utility and was more effective in the low-price group. Government policies that incentivize the adoption of a seaweed MRA could aid in meeting climate goals.
消费者对低甲烷牛肉的偏好:购买前信息、购买点标签和价格上涨的影响
据估计,养牛业是美利坚合众国(U.S. )与消费需求相关的最大甲烷(CH4)排放者。随着国家承诺在 2030 年前将甲烷排放量减少 30%,甲烷减排添加剂(MRA)作为一种可行的解决方案正在牲畜饲料中进行探索。本研究调查了消费者对使用三种甲烷减排水平不同的 MRA 之一生产的低甲烷碎牛肉的偏好:这三种 MRA 分别是:Aspagopsis taxiformis(海藻)、有机化合物 3-nitroxypropanol (3NOP) 或混合精油(如大蒜提取物和柑橘)。在一项具有全国代表性的调查中,3,009 名受访者完成了一项标签离散选择实验,该实验用于估算传统碎牛肉和低甲烷碎牛肉的偏好、WTP 和市场份额。随机分组在购买前获得了牛肉生产过程中甲烷排放的相关信息,并在购买点获得了宣传每种 MRA 甲烷减排水平的标签。鉴于当时牛肉价格上涨,受访者被随机分为低价组和高价组,以考察结果的敏感性。虽然消费者普遍倾向于传统的碎牛肉,但在获得购买前和购买点信息的群体中,海藻 MRA 产品(甲烷减排潜力最高的 MRA)的消费者 WTP 和平均市场份额超过了传统牛肉。在低价组中,信息的作用更大,效果更好。鼓励采用海藻 MRA 的政府政策有助于实现气候目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信