Perceptions of an acute medical unit in internal medicine on interprofessional collaboration.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Abd Al Kareem Adi, Thana Harhara, Leen Oyoun Alsoud, Shahad Abasaeed Elhag, Imane Benani, Halah Ibrahim
{"title":"Perceptions of an acute medical unit in internal medicine on interprofessional collaboration.","authors":"Abd Al Kareem Adi, Thana Harhara, Leen Oyoun Alsoud, Shahad Abasaeed Elhag, Imane Benani, Halah Ibrahim","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2024.2428967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to assess perceptions about interprofessional collaboration (IPC) of healthcare professionals working in an acute medical unit (AMU) in an internal medicine department in the United Arab Emirates. The AMU provides care during the initial 24 to 72 hours of admission and emphasizes interprofessional collaboration. Using the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II, the study measured partnership, cooperation, and coordination among team members. Between November 5, 2022, and January 5, 2023, 81 participants completed the survey, including physicians (<i>n</i> = 45; 55.5%), nurses (<i>n</i> = 18; 22.2%), and clinical and non-clinical allied health professionals (<i>n</i> = 18; 22.2%). On a Likert-type scale of one to five, most respondents perceived partnership, cooperation, and team coordination as <i>good collaboration</i> on the AMU, with mean scores of 4.29, 4.16, and 4.15, respectively. There was no significant difference between physicians' (4.18) and nurses' (4.45) perspectives of IPC on the AMU (<i>p</i> = .10), but physicians were less likely to notice collaborative practice changes compared to other professionals. Introducing IPC early in medical education might enhance future collaborative practice. This study sheds light on IPC in non-Western contexts and provides insights into how collaboration is perceived and practiced in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2428967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to assess perceptions about interprofessional collaboration (IPC) of healthcare professionals working in an acute medical unit (AMU) in an internal medicine department in the United Arab Emirates. The AMU provides care during the initial 24 to 72 hours of admission and emphasizes interprofessional collaboration. Using the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II, the study measured partnership, cooperation, and coordination among team members. Between November 5, 2022, and January 5, 2023, 81 participants completed the survey, including physicians (n = 45; 55.5%), nurses (n = 18; 22.2%), and clinical and non-clinical allied health professionals (n = 18; 22.2%). On a Likert-type scale of one to five, most respondents perceived partnership, cooperation, and team coordination as good collaboration on the AMU, with mean scores of 4.29, 4.16, and 4.15, respectively. There was no significant difference between physicians' (4.18) and nurses' (4.45) perspectives of IPC on the AMU (p = .10), but physicians were less likely to notice collaborative practice changes compared to other professionals. Introducing IPC early in medical education might enhance future collaborative practice. This study sheds light on IPC in non-Western contexts and provides insights into how collaboration is perceived and practiced in diverse healthcare settings.

内科急诊室对跨专业合作的看法。
我们旨在评估在阿拉伯联合酋长国内科急诊室(AMU)工作的医护人员对跨专业协作(IPC)的看法。急诊病房在患者入院的最初 24 到 72 小时内提供护理服务,并强调跨专业协作。该研究使用跨专业团队合作评估量表 II 来衡量团队成员之间的合作关系、合作能力和协调能力。2022 年 11 月 5 日至 2023 年 1 月 5 日期间,81 名参与者完成了调查,其中包括医生(n = 45;55.5%)、护士(n = 18;22.2%)以及临床和非临床专职医疗人员(n = 18;22.2%)。在 1 到 5 分的李克特量表中,大多数受访者认为伙伴关系、合作和团队协调是 AMU 的良好合作方式,平均得分分别为 4.29、4.16 和 4.15。医生(4.18 分)和护士(4.45 分)对 AMU 上 IPC 的看法没有明显差异(p = .10),但与其他专业人员相比,医生不太可能注意到合作实践的变化。在医学教育中尽早引入 IPC 可能会促进未来的合作实践。本研究揭示了在非西方环境下的 IPC,并提供了在不同医疗环境中如何看待和实践协作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信