How the brain differentiates human and monkey faces: Neuromagnetic evidence from spatiotemporal dynamics.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Emi Yamada, Akinori Takeda, Hisato Nakazono, Mutsuhide Tanaka, Katsuya Ogata, Shozo Tobimatsu
{"title":"How the brain differentiates human and monkey faces: Neuromagnetic evidence from spatiotemporal dynamics.","authors":"Emi Yamada, Akinori Takeda, Hisato Nakazono, Mutsuhide Tanaka, Katsuya Ogata, Shozo Tobimatsu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face recognition is an important aspect of human non-verbal communication. Event-related potentials or magnetic fields, such as the N170/M170 component, are considered essential neural markers of face processing. Compared to upright human faces, inverted human faces and upright but not inverted animal faces cause longer latencies and larger amplitudes of these components. However, the mechanisms underlying this factor remain unclear. To elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of inverted human and animal faces, we recorded face-selective responses (M170) to upright and inverted human and monkey faces using a 306-channel whole-head magnetoencephalography. Sensor analysis showed an increased M170 latency and amplitude for inverted human and upright animal faces. However, in the source analysis, the observed modulations of the estimated spatiotemporal dynamics were different from the sensor results: irrespective of species, upright faces activated wider areas in the ventral and dorsal visual regions compared with inverted faces. Additionally, face orientation differentially modulated the anterior region of the fusiform gyrus (FG) in both face categories. These results suggest that spatiotemporal dynamics differ in face orientation regardless of category and that the FG contributes little or nothing to the M170 modulation recorded in the scalp sensor. Furthermore, we demonstrated that inverted human and animal faces are processed via different mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Face recognition is an important aspect of human non-verbal communication. Event-related potentials or magnetic fields, such as the N170/M170 component, are considered essential neural markers of face processing. Compared to upright human faces, inverted human faces and upright but not inverted animal faces cause longer latencies and larger amplitudes of these components. However, the mechanisms underlying this factor remain unclear. To elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of inverted human and animal faces, we recorded face-selective responses (M170) to upright and inverted human and monkey faces using a 306-channel whole-head magnetoencephalography. Sensor analysis showed an increased M170 latency and amplitude for inverted human and upright animal faces. However, in the source analysis, the observed modulations of the estimated spatiotemporal dynamics were different from the sensor results: irrespective of species, upright faces activated wider areas in the ventral and dorsal visual regions compared with inverted faces. Additionally, face orientation differentially modulated the anterior region of the fusiform gyrus (FG) in both face categories. These results suggest that spatiotemporal dynamics differ in face orientation regardless of category and that the FG contributes little or nothing to the M170 modulation recorded in the scalp sensor. Furthermore, we demonstrated that inverted human and animal faces are processed via different mechanisms.

大脑如何区分人脸和猴脸:来自时空动态的神经磁性证据
人脸识别是人类非语言交流的一个重要方面。事件相关电位或磁场(如 N170/M170 分量)被认为是人脸处理过程中的重要神经标记。与直立的人脸相比,倒立的人脸和直立而非倒立的动物脸会导致这些成分的潜伏期更长、振幅更大。然而,这一因素的内在机制仍不清楚。为了阐明倒置人脸和动物脸的时空动态处理,我们使用 306 通道全头脑磁图记录了对直立和倒置人脸和猴脸的脸选择性反应(M170)。传感器分析表明,倒置的人脸和直立的动物脸的 M170 潜伏期和振幅都有所增加。然而,在源分析中,所观察到的估计时空动态的调节与传感器的结果不同:与倒立的人脸相比,无论哪种动物,直立的人脸都会激活腹侧和背侧视觉区域中更宽的区域。此外,在两种面孔类别中,面孔方位对纺锤形回(FG)前部区域的调节也不同。这些结果表明,无论面孔类别如何,面孔方位的时空动态都是不同的,而 FG 对头皮传感器记录到的 M170 调制几乎没有贡献。此外,我们还证明了倒置的人脸和动物脸通过不同的机制进行处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信