Family science, land‐grant universities, and the daunting legacy of the land‐grab institution

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Theresa J. Ambo, Stephen M. Gavazzi
{"title":"Family science, land‐grant universities, and the daunting legacy of the land‐grab institution","authors":"Theresa J. Ambo, Stephen M. Gavazzi","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper wrestles with the nexus of settler colonialism, the expropriation of Indigenous lands to establish the United States land‐grant system, and the field of Family Science. Family Science programs are embedded within the power structures of the universities to which they belong; certain characteristics of these academic units—especially their emphasis on engagement and professional credentialing—theoretically could produce an idiosyncratic and nuanced context in which academy members operate. First, we grapple with the history of US settler colonialism and the land‐grab concept, focusing attention on the enormous transfer of Native American lands into universities through the Morrill Act. Second, we examine the convergence between the applied activities of family scientists and the tripartite land‐grant mission of teaching, research, and engagement. Consequently, our final aim is to investigate the impact of being a family scientist within a land‐grant university grappling with the historical injustices surrounding its foundation.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper wrestles with the nexus of settler colonialism, the expropriation of Indigenous lands to establish the United States land‐grant system, and the field of Family Science. Family Science programs are embedded within the power structures of the universities to which they belong; certain characteristics of these academic units—especially their emphasis on engagement and professional credentialing—theoretically could produce an idiosyncratic and nuanced context in which academy members operate. First, we grapple with the history of US settler colonialism and the land‐grab concept, focusing attention on the enormous transfer of Native American lands into universities through the Morrill Act. Second, we examine the convergence between the applied activities of family scientists and the tripartite land‐grant mission of teaching, research, and engagement. Consequently, our final aim is to investigate the impact of being a family scientist within a land‐grant university grappling with the historical injustices surrounding its foundation.
家庭科学、赠地大学和土地掠夺机构的可怕遗产
本文探讨了定居者殖民主义、征用土著土地以建立美国赠地制度以及家庭科学领域之间的联系。家庭科学项目蕴含在其所属大学的权力结构中;这些学术单位的某些特征--尤其是它们对参与和专业认证的强调--从理论上讲,可以为学术界成员的运作提供一个特异而微妙的环境。首先,我们探讨了美国殖民主义定居者的历史和土地掠夺概念,重点关注通过《莫里尔法案》将美国原住民土地大量转移到大学的情况。其次,我们研究了家庭科学家的应用活动与赠地大学的教学、研究和参与三方使命之间的融合。因此,我们的最终目的是研究作为一名家庭科学家,在一所与历史上的不公作斗争的赠地大学中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信