Fátima Santalla Borreiros , Ramón González Cabanach , Manuel Romero-Soto , Antonio Souto-Gestal
{"title":"Calidad de la atención en podología universitaria. Análisis del cuestionario de satisfacción del paciente","authors":"Fátima Santalla Borreiros , Ramón González Cabanach , Manuel Romero-Soto , Antonio Souto-Gestal","doi":"10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the validity and reliability of a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed to measure the quality of care in university podiatry clinics, and to analyze the perception of care quality in this teaching-assistance setting.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Descriptive cross-sectional observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University Podiatry Clinic at the University of A Coruña (CUP-UDC), Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Three hundred and fifteen adult users capable of completing a questionnaire on podiatric care quality, selected through consecutive sampling. The rejection rate was 4.3%.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The “Quality of care in the clinical area of podiatry questionnaire” was used, specifically designed to measure the quality of care in university podiatry clinics. It evaluated clinical aspects, information, administration, facilities, timing, and accessibility on a 5-point Likert scale. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall mean score was 4.48<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.34 (“<span>Good</span>”). Factor analysis revealed six dimensions instead of the original five, suggesting a more valid structure. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.881). The best-rated factors were “Care”, “Procedures” and “Clinical aspects”.’ Item correlations showed some differences from the original study, highlighting a strong correlation between care received and staff friendliness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results indicate high satisfaction with care at CUP-UDC. The analyzed instrument proved to be valid and reliable for assessing care quality in the university podiatry setting from the service user's perspective. The new factor structure provides a more detailed view of the factors influencing care quality, offering valuable information to improve clinical practice and podiatry training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55435,"journal":{"name":"Atencion Primaria","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 103138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atencion Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the validity and reliability of a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed to measure the quality of care in university podiatry clinics, and to analyze the perception of care quality in this teaching-assistance setting.
Design
Descriptive cross-sectional observational study.
Setting
University Podiatry Clinic at the University of A Coruña (CUP-UDC), Spain.
Participants
Three hundred and fifteen adult users capable of completing a questionnaire on podiatric care quality, selected through consecutive sampling. The rejection rate was 4.3%.
Interventions
The “Quality of care in the clinical area of podiatry questionnaire” was used, specifically designed to measure the quality of care in university podiatry clinics. It evaluated clinical aspects, information, administration, facilities, timing, and accessibility on a 5-point Likert scale. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Results
The overall mean score was 4.48 ± 0.34 (“Good”). Factor analysis revealed six dimensions instead of the original five, suggesting a more valid structure. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.881). The best-rated factors were “Care”, “Procedures” and “Clinical aspects”.’ Item correlations showed some differences from the original study, highlighting a strong correlation between care received and staff friendliness.
Conclusions
The results indicate high satisfaction with care at CUP-UDC. The analyzed instrument proved to be valid and reliable for assessing care quality in the university podiatry setting from the service user's perspective. The new factor structure provides a more detailed view of the factors influencing care quality, offering valuable information to improve clinical practice and podiatry training.
期刊介绍:
Atención Primaria es una revista que publica trabajos de investigación relativos al ámbito de la atención primaria de salud. Desde el punto de vista conceptual, Atención Primaria asume el nuevo modelo de atención primaria de salud, orientado no sólo a la curación de la enfermedad, sino también a su prevención y a la promoción de la salud, tanto en el plano individual como en el de la familia y la comunidad. En estos nuevos aspectos que definen el modelo de atención primaria de salud es en los que se centran los trabajos de investigación que publica Atención Primaria, la primera revista de originales española creada para recoger y difundir la producción científica realizada desde los centros de atención primaria de salud sobre cuestiones como protocolización de la asistencia, programas de prevención, seguimiento y control de pacientes crónicos, organización y gestión de la asistencia primaria, entre otros.