Impact of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction on Physical Properties, Antioxidant Activity, and Colorimetric pH-Response of Blackcurrant Pomace Extract

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Zainal Arifin Maryam Adilah, Zainal Abedin Nur Hanani, Mohamad Azman Ezzat, Ab Razak Nor Asma and Mohd Adzahan Noranizan*, 
{"title":"Impact of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction on Physical Properties, Antioxidant Activity, and Colorimetric pH-Response of Blackcurrant Pomace Extract","authors":"Zainal Arifin Maryam Adilah,&nbsp;Zainal Abedin Nur Hanani,&nbsp;Mohamad Azman Ezzat,&nbsp;Ab Razak Nor Asma and Mohd Adzahan Noranizan*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0048610.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of ultrasound in extracting phenolic compounds from dried blackcurrant pomace (DBP) compared to the traditional extraction method. DBP extraction was carried out using maceration (control) and three levels of ultrasound power (256, 448, and 640 W) for 5, 15, and 25 min. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) of DPB resulted in a 40% higher yield than macerated samples (9.35%). Specifically, UAE Sample C (256 W, 25 min) significantly improved the total monomeric anthocyanin content (by 33%), total phenolic content (up to 16%), and radical scavenging activity (by 26%) compared to the control. The morphology of the ultrasound-treated DBP showed porous cells that resembled a hollow honeycomb structure. The phenolic profiling of ultrasound-treated DBP showed significantly higher contents of anthocyanin, hydroxycinnamic acid, and flavonols than the control. Ultrasound can also extract compounds such as myricetin and quercetin, which typically require strong acids and high temperatures, thus proving that ultrasound is a better extraction method than conventional extraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":"4 11","pages":"2645–2654 2645–2654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of ultrasound in extracting phenolic compounds from dried blackcurrant pomace (DBP) compared to the traditional extraction method. DBP extraction was carried out using maceration (control) and three levels of ultrasound power (256, 448, and 640 W) for 5, 15, and 25 min. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) of DPB resulted in a 40% higher yield than macerated samples (9.35%). Specifically, UAE Sample C (256 W, 25 min) significantly improved the total monomeric anthocyanin content (by 33%), total phenolic content (up to 16%), and radical scavenging activity (by 26%) compared to the control. The morphology of the ultrasound-treated DBP showed porous cells that resembled a hollow honeycomb structure. The phenolic profiling of ultrasound-treated DBP showed significantly higher contents of anthocyanin, hydroxycinnamic acid, and flavonols than the control. Ultrasound can also extract compounds such as myricetin and quercetin, which typically require strong acids and high temperatures, thus proving that ultrasound is a better extraction method than conventional extraction.

Abstract Image

超声波辅助萃取对黑加仑果渣提取物物理性质、抗氧化活性和比色法 pH 值反应的影响
本研究旨在评估与传统提取方法相比,超声波提取黑加仑干果渣(DBP)中酚类化合物的效率。黑加仑干果渣萃取采用浸渍法(对照组)和三种超声功率(256、448 和 640 W),时间分别为 5、15 和 25 分钟。与浸渍样品(9.35%)相比,超声辅助萃取(UAE)DPB 的产量高出 40%。具体来说,与对照组相比,超声辅助提取样品 C(256 W,25 分钟)显著提高了单体花青素总含量(33%)、总酚含量(高达 16%)和自由基清除活性(26%)。经超声波处理的 DBP 的形态显示出多孔的细胞,类似于中空的蜂巢结构。经超声波处理的 DBP 的酚分析表明,花青素、羟基肉桂酸和黄酮醇的含量明显高于对照组。超声波还能提取通常需要强酸和高温才能提取的化合物,如杨梅素和槲皮素,从而证明超声波是一种比传统提取方法更好的提取方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信