Evaluation of High-Pressure Processing (HPP) for the Stabilization of Prickly Pear Puree through the Assessment of Its Microbiological, Enzymatic, and Nutritional Features

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Andrea Feroce, Carola Nicosia* and Fabio Licciardello, 
{"title":"Evaluation of High-Pressure Processing (HPP) for the Stabilization of Prickly Pear Puree through the Assessment of Its Microbiological, Enzymatic, and Nutritional Features","authors":"Andrea Feroce,&nbsp;Carola Nicosia* and Fabio Licciardello,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0043910.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study explores hydrostatic pressure processing (HPP) as an alternative to thermal pasteurization for stabilizing prickly pear puree, focusing on its microbiological, enzymatic, and nutritive features. The puree underwent HPP (600 MPa for 180 s at 5 °C) or pasteurization (80 °C for 30 s) and was stored at 4 °C. The impacts of treatments were assessed at time 0, and stabilized purees were monitored weekly for 42 days. HPP ensured microbial stability and better color preservation and maintained the total phenolic content. The antioxidant capacity was better preserved after HPP and was retained for up to 28 days of refrigerated storage. HPP enhanced ascorbic acid retention, with only a 2% reduction compared to 22% with pasteurization. Both treatments similarly inactivated pectin methyl esterase and lipoxygenase. Despite HPP being less effective against polyphenol oxidase, the pressurized samples showed no negative impacts on color or volatiles’ profile, the latter being better preserved with HPP than with pasteurization.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":"4 11","pages":"2614–2625 2614–2625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores hydrostatic pressure processing (HPP) as an alternative to thermal pasteurization for stabilizing prickly pear puree, focusing on its microbiological, enzymatic, and nutritive features. The puree underwent HPP (600 MPa for 180 s at 5 °C) or pasteurization (80 °C for 30 s) and was stored at 4 °C. The impacts of treatments were assessed at time 0, and stabilized purees were monitored weekly for 42 days. HPP ensured microbial stability and better color preservation and maintained the total phenolic content. The antioxidant capacity was better preserved after HPP and was retained for up to 28 days of refrigerated storage. HPP enhanced ascorbic acid retention, with only a 2% reduction compared to 22% with pasteurization. Both treatments similarly inactivated pectin methyl esterase and lipoxygenase. Despite HPP being less effective against polyphenol oxidase, the pressurized samples showed no negative impacts on color or volatiles’ profile, the latter being better preserved with HPP than with pasteurization.

Abstract Image

通过评估微生物、酶和营养特性,评估高压加工(HPP)对刺梨果泥稳定性的作用
本研究探讨了用静水压处理(HPP)替代热巴氏杀菌法稳定刺梨果泥的方法,重点关注其微生物、酶和营养特性。刺梨泥经过 HPP(600 兆帕,180 秒,5 °C)或巴氏杀菌(80 °C,30 秒)处理后在 4 °C 下储存。处理的影响在 0 时进行评估,稳定后的果泥在 42 天内每周监测一次。HPP 确保了微生物的稳定性和更好的保色性,并保持了总酚类含量。经 HPP 处理后,抗氧化能力得到了更好的保存,并在冷藏保存 28 天后仍能保持。HPP 提高了抗坏血酸的保留率,只减少了 2%,而巴氏杀菌则减少了 22%。两种处理方法都同样灭活了果胶甲酯酶和脂氧合酶。尽管 HPP 对多酚氧化酶的抑制作用较弱,但加压样品对颜色或挥发性物质没有负面影响,HPP 比巴氏杀菌法更好地保留了挥发性物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信