Cardiogenic shock

Enzo Lüsebrink, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Marianna Adamo, Roberto Lorusso, Alexandre Mebazaa, David A Morrow, Susanna Price, Jacob C Jentzer, Daniel Brodie, Alain Combes, Holger Thiele
{"title":"Cardiogenic shock","authors":"Enzo Lüsebrink, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Marianna Adamo, Roberto Lorusso, Alexandre Mebazaa, David A Morrow, Susanna Price, Jacob C Jentzer, Daniel Brodie, Alain Combes, Holger Thiele","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01818-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiogenic shock is a complex syndrome defined by systemic hypoperfusion and inadequate cardiac output arising from a wide array of underlying causes. Although the understanding of cardiogenic shock epidemiology, specific subphenotypes, haemodynamics, and cardiogenic shock severity staging has evolved, few therapeutic interventions have shown survival benefit. Results from seminal randomised controlled trials support early revascularisation of the culprit vessel in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and provide evidence of improved survival with the use of temporary circulatory support in selected patients. However, numerous questions remain unanswered, including optimal pharmacotherapy regimens, the role of mechanical circulatory support devices, management of secondary organ dysfunction, and best supportive care. This Review summarises current definitions, pathophysiological principles, and management approaches in cardiogenic shock, and highlights key knowledge gaps to advance individualised shock therapy and the evidence-based ethical use of modern technology and resources in cardiogenic shock.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01818-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a complex syndrome defined by systemic hypoperfusion and inadequate cardiac output arising from a wide array of underlying causes. Although the understanding of cardiogenic shock epidemiology, specific subphenotypes, haemodynamics, and cardiogenic shock severity staging has evolved, few therapeutic interventions have shown survival benefit. Results from seminal randomised controlled trials support early revascularisation of the culprit vessel in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and provide evidence of improved survival with the use of temporary circulatory support in selected patients. However, numerous questions remain unanswered, including optimal pharmacotherapy regimens, the role of mechanical circulatory support devices, management of secondary organ dysfunction, and best supportive care. This Review summarises current definitions, pathophysiological principles, and management approaches in cardiogenic shock, and highlights key knowledge gaps to advance individualised shock therapy and the evidence-based ethical use of modern technology and resources in cardiogenic shock.
心源性休克
心源性休克是一种复杂的综合征,由多种潜在病因引起的全身灌注不足和心输出量不足所导致。尽管人们对心源性休克的流行病学、特定亚型、血流动力学和心源性休克严重程度分期的认识不断发展,但很少有治疗干预措施能使患者存活下来。开创性的随机对照试验结果支持尽早对梗死相关性心源性休克的罪魁祸首血管进行血运重建,并有证据表明,对特定患者使用临时循环支持可提高存活率。然而,许多问题仍未得到解答,包括最佳药物治疗方案、机械循环支持装置的作用、继发性器官功能障碍的管理和最佳支持性护理。本综述总结了当前心源性休克的定义、病理生理学原理和管理方法,并强调了关键的知识缺口,以促进个体化休克治疗和以循证伦理为基础的现代技术和资源在心源性休克中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信