Acquiring Resourcefulness Skills: Formal Versus Informal Training.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Jaclene A Zauszniewski, Christopher J Burant, Evanne Juratovac, Alexandra Jeanblanc, John S Sweetko, Catherine Larsen, Rayhanah Almutairi, Hang Ying She, Evelina DiFranco, Kari Colon-Zimmerman, Martha Sajatovic
{"title":"Acquiring Resourcefulness Skills: Formal Versus Informal Training.","authors":"Jaclene A Zauszniewski, Christopher J Burant, Evanne Juratovac, Alexandra Jeanblanc, John S Sweetko, Catherine Larsen, Rayhanah Almutairi, Hang Ying She, Evelina DiFranco, Kari Colon-Zimmerman, Martha Sajatovic","doi":"10.1177/01939459241296613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although resourcefulness has been successfully taught during formal training programs, it can also be acquired informally through life experiences. Family caregivers have many opportunities for learning to be resourceful on their own and those who participate in research may acquire knowledge or skills that increase their resourcefulness. The effects of such differential experiences on the resourcefulness of family caregivers have not been examined over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared changes in resourcefulness over time in caregivers who received no intervention, an educational program, biofeedback, or Resourcefulness Training<sup>©</sup>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial involved 219 caregivers of persons with bipolar disorder who completed the Resourcefulness Scale<sup>©</sup> before no intervention, an educational program, biofeedback, or Resourcefulness Training, and at 6 and 12 months afterward. Differences across the groups were examined using RMANOVA. Patterns of mean scores including differences and linear trends in resourcefulness for the four groups were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, caregivers increased linearly in resourcefulness over time [<i>F</i>(1,215) = 4.836, <i>P</i> = .015]. Although each group showed improvement in resourcefulness, caregivers who received Resourcefulness Training showed the greatest improvement from baseline (estimated mean = 88.244, SE = 2.734) at both 6 months (estimated mean = 92.610, SE = 2.813, <i>P</i> = .026) and 12 months post-intervention (estimated mean = 95.049, SE = 2.752, <i>P</i> = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with resourcefulness theory, the findings showed caregivers of persons with bipolar disorder became more resourceful over time with or without formal training. However, those who received Resourcefulness Training demonstrated resourcefulness skills sooner and to a greater extent, thereby providing the rationale for formal Resourcefulness Training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1939459241296613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241296613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although resourcefulness has been successfully taught during formal training programs, it can also be acquired informally through life experiences. Family caregivers have many opportunities for learning to be resourceful on their own and those who participate in research may acquire knowledge or skills that increase their resourcefulness. The effects of such differential experiences on the resourcefulness of family caregivers have not been examined over time.

Objective: This study compared changes in resourcefulness over time in caregivers who received no intervention, an educational program, biofeedback, or Resourcefulness Training©.

Methods: This longitudinal analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial involved 219 caregivers of persons with bipolar disorder who completed the Resourcefulness Scale© before no intervention, an educational program, biofeedback, or Resourcefulness Training, and at 6 and 12 months afterward. Differences across the groups were examined using RMANOVA. Patterns of mean scores including differences and linear trends in resourcefulness for the four groups were examined.

Results: Overall, caregivers increased linearly in resourcefulness over time [F(1,215) = 4.836, P = .015]. Although each group showed improvement in resourcefulness, caregivers who received Resourcefulness Training showed the greatest improvement from baseline (estimated mean = 88.244, SE = 2.734) at both 6 months (estimated mean = 92.610, SE = 2.813, P = .026) and 12 months post-intervention (estimated mean = 95.049, SE = 2.752, P = .003).

Conclusions: Consistent with resourcefulness theory, the findings showed caregivers of persons with bipolar disorder became more resourceful over time with or without formal training. However, those who received Resourcefulness Training demonstrated resourcefulness skills sooner and to a greater extent, thereby providing the rationale for formal Resourcefulness Training programs.

获取机智技能:正式培训与非正式培训。
背景:虽然足智多谋已在正规培训项目中成功传授,但足智多谋也可以通过非正式的生活经历获得。家庭照顾者有很多机会自己学习如何足智多谋,而那些参与研究的人可能会获得增加其足智多谋的知识或技能。这些不同的经历对家庭照顾者足智多谋的影响尚未随着时间的推移而被研究:本研究比较了未接受干预、教育计划、生物反馈或资源丰富性训练(Resourcefulness Training©)的照顾者的资源丰富性随时间的变化:这项对随机对照试验数据的纵向分析涉及 219 名双相情感障碍患者的照顾者,他们在未接受干预、接受教育项目、生物反馈或足智多谋训练前,以及接受干预后 6 个月和 12 个月时,都填写了足智多谋量表© 。我们使用 RMANOVA 检验了各组之间的差异。研究了四个组的平均得分模式,包括足智多谋方面的差异和线性趋势:总体而言,随着时间的推移,护理人员的足智多谋程度呈线性增长[F(1,215) = 4.836, P = .015]。虽然每组的足智多谋程度都有所提高,但接受足智多谋培训的护理人员在干预后 6 个月(估计平均值 = 92.610,SE = 2.813,P = .026)和 12 个月(估计平均值 = 95.049,SE = 2.752,P = .003)与基线相比的提高幅度最大(估计平均值 = 88.244,SE = 2.734):与足智多谋理论一致,研究结果表明,无论是否接受过正规培训,双相情感障碍患者的照顾者随着时间的推移变得更加足智多谋。然而,那些接受过足智多谋培训的人更快且更大程度地展现了足智多谋的技能,从而为正式的足智多谋培训项目提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信