Small wins in practice: Learnings from 16 European initiatives working towards the transformation of urban food systems

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Madhura Rao , Jonathan Luger , Barbara J. Regeer , Cristina Yacoub Lopez , Danielle Wilde , David Wilde , Emel Karakaya Ayalp , Julia Pinedo Gil , Nina Isabella Moeller , Yağmur Özcan Cive , Marjoleine G. van der Meij
{"title":"Small wins in practice: Learnings from 16 European initiatives working towards the transformation of urban food systems","authors":"Madhura Rao ,&nbsp;Jonathan Luger ,&nbsp;Barbara J. Regeer ,&nbsp;Cristina Yacoub Lopez ,&nbsp;Danielle Wilde ,&nbsp;David Wilde ,&nbsp;Emel Karakaya Ayalp ,&nbsp;Julia Pinedo Gil ,&nbsp;Nina Isabella Moeller ,&nbsp;Yağmur Özcan Cive ,&nbsp;Marjoleine G. van der Meij","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we examine how 16 initiatives across Europe are addressing ‘wicked’ food system issues by mobilising local networks and implementing small-scale but impactful changes in urban and <em>peri</em>-urban regions. To map the potential of these initiatives to contribute to large-scale change, we apply the Small Wins Framework proposed by <span><span>Termeer &amp; Dewulf (2019)</span></span>. By analysing data collected through interviews with participants working on initiatives spanning 13 cities across 9 European countries, we identify the manifestation of six propelling mechanisms that signal the capacity of small wins to bring about systemic change. Findings from this study reveal the presence of most mechanisms across the included initiatives. However, the ways in which these mechanisms appear depend on various factors such as stakeholder motivation, the maturity of the initiative, the need for additional funding, local food culture, and the regional and national political landscape among others. Our analysis indicates that the Small Wins Framework could be successfully used as a mapping tool in urban transformation processes, but it is likely to be more effective as a tool for reflexive monitoring rather than ex-post evaluation. Drawing on the impacts of various large-scale disruptions on the initiatives, we suggest that social, political, and economic shocks can present windows of opportunity to accelerate change and that initiatives performing well under such pressure should be supported in their pursuit of systems transformation. Lastly, we recommend non-linear growth strategies such as spreading, deepening, and expanding, as ways to compound the impact of small wins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102761"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we examine how 16 initiatives across Europe are addressing ‘wicked’ food system issues by mobilising local networks and implementing small-scale but impactful changes in urban and peri-urban regions. To map the potential of these initiatives to contribute to large-scale change, we apply the Small Wins Framework proposed by Termeer & Dewulf (2019). By analysing data collected through interviews with participants working on initiatives spanning 13 cities across 9 European countries, we identify the manifestation of six propelling mechanisms that signal the capacity of small wins to bring about systemic change. Findings from this study reveal the presence of most mechanisms across the included initiatives. However, the ways in which these mechanisms appear depend on various factors such as stakeholder motivation, the maturity of the initiative, the need for additional funding, local food culture, and the regional and national political landscape among others. Our analysis indicates that the Small Wins Framework could be successfully used as a mapping tool in urban transformation processes, but it is likely to be more effective as a tool for reflexive monitoring rather than ex-post evaluation. Drawing on the impacts of various large-scale disruptions on the initiatives, we suggest that social, political, and economic shocks can present windows of opportunity to accelerate change and that initiatives performing well under such pressure should be supported in their pursuit of systems transformation. Lastly, we recommend non-linear growth strategies such as spreading, deepening, and expanding, as ways to compound the impact of small wins.
小赢在实践中:从 16 项致力于改造城市粮食系统的欧洲倡议中汲取经验
在这项研究中,我们考察了欧洲的 16 项倡议如何通过动员地方网络,在城市和城郊地区实施小规模但有影响力的变革,来解决 "邪恶 "的粮食系统问题。为了绘制这些倡议推动大规模变革的潜力图,我们采用了 Termeer & Dewulf(2019 年)提出的 "小赢框架"。通过分析与横跨 9 个欧洲国家 13 个城市的倡议参与者访谈收集到的数据,我们确定了六种推动机制的表现形式,这些机制标志着小赢家带来系统性变革的能力。研究结果表明,大多数机制都存在于所包含的倡议中。然而,这些机制的出现方式取决于各种因素,如利益相关者的动机、倡议的成熟度、对额外资金的需求、当地饮食文化以及地区和国家政治格局等。我们的分析表明,"小赢框架 "可以成功地用作城市转型过程中的绘图工具,但作为一种反思性监测工具,它可能比事后评估更为有效。根据各种大规模破坏对倡议的影响,我们建议社会、政治和经济冲击可以为加速变革提供机会之窗,在这种压力下表现出色的倡议应得到支持,以实现系统转型。最后,我们建议采取非线性增长战略,如扩散、深化和扩展,以此来扩大小赢的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信