Physical therapy approach and non-invasive modalities in treatment of vaginal laxity: a literature review.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lama Eid, Mina George, Doaa A Abdel Hady
{"title":"Physical therapy approach and non-invasive modalities in treatment of vaginal laxity: a literature review.","authors":"Lama Eid, Mina George, Doaa A Abdel Hady","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and noninvasive modalities can be more safe and available treatments for vaginal laxity (VL) with less risk of postsurgical complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this review is to define the concepts of PFPT and noninvasive modalities, examine the evidence supporting those modalities as a treatment for VL, and evaluate their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2002 and 2023, clinical studies including women diagnosed with VL were examined in the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Exclusion criteria included studies with no outcomes or inadequate data, procedures, suggestions, editorials, book chapters, letters to editors, reviews, meta-analyses, animal research, and articles in languages other than English.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Only seventeen studies have been identified. Four studies have demonstrated the impact of PFPT (low- and medium-energy radiofrequency (RF), ultrasound, low-energy laser treatment, par sacral stimulation, the knack method, and pelvic floor exercises), and thirteen studies have discussed the impact of noninvasive modalities (RF, combined multipolar RF with pulsed electromagnetic, combined RF and pulsed electromagnetic field, high-intensity focused ultrasound, CO2 laser, combining multipolar RF and hybrid fractional laser, microfocused ultrasound, and the VIVEVE surface-cooled RF) on vaginal laxity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review indicates many knowledge areas that must be attempted in order to understand the influence of nonstrengthening physical therapy and noninvasive methods on vaginal laxity. In addition to the mechanisms behind their impacts. In addition, we strongly recommend that more clinical trials of high methodological and interventional quality are required to investigate the efficacy of various physical therapy approaches, including electrical stimulation, biofeedback exertion, acupressure, manual therapy, neuromodulation, core exercise therapy, hydrotherapy, well-designed ultrasound therapy protocols, and vaginal weight training.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and noninvasive modalities can be more safe and available treatments for vaginal laxity (VL) with less risk of postsurgical complications.

Objectives: The purpose of this review is to define the concepts of PFPT and noninvasive modalities, examine the evidence supporting those modalities as a treatment for VL, and evaluate their effectiveness.

Methods: Between 2002 and 2023, clinical studies including women diagnosed with VL were examined in the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Exclusion criteria included studies with no outcomes or inadequate data, procedures, suggestions, editorials, book chapters, letters to editors, reviews, meta-analyses, animal research, and articles in languages other than English.

Result: Only seventeen studies have been identified. Four studies have demonstrated the impact of PFPT (low- and medium-energy radiofrequency (RF), ultrasound, low-energy laser treatment, par sacral stimulation, the knack method, and pelvic floor exercises), and thirteen studies have discussed the impact of noninvasive modalities (RF, combined multipolar RF with pulsed electromagnetic, combined RF and pulsed electromagnetic field, high-intensity focused ultrasound, CO2 laser, combining multipolar RF and hybrid fractional laser, microfocused ultrasound, and the VIVEVE surface-cooled RF) on vaginal laxity.

Conclusion: This review indicates many knowledge areas that must be attempted in order to understand the influence of nonstrengthening physical therapy and noninvasive methods on vaginal laxity. In addition to the mechanisms behind their impacts. In addition, we strongly recommend that more clinical trials of high methodological and interventional quality are required to investigate the efficacy of various physical therapy approaches, including electrical stimulation, biofeedback exertion, acupressure, manual therapy, neuromodulation, core exercise therapy, hydrotherapy, well-designed ultrasound therapy protocols, and vaginal weight training.

治疗阴道松弛的物理疗法和非侵入性方法:文献综述。
简介:盆底物理疗法(PFPT)和无创疗法是治疗阴道松弛(VL)更安全、更有效的方法,且手术后并发症风险更低:盆底物理疗法(PFPT)和无创疗法是治疗阴道松弛(VL)的更安全、更有效的方法,且手术后并发症的风险更低:本综述旨在定义 PFPT 和非侵入性方法的概念,研究支持这些方法治疗 VL 的证据,并评估其有效性:方法:2002 年至 2023 年期间,在 Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中对包括确诊为 VL 的女性在内的临床研究进行了研究。排除标准包括无结果或数据不充分的研究、程序、建议、社论、书籍章节、致编辑的信、综述、荟萃分析、动物研究以及非英语语言的文章:结果:只发现了 17 项研究。其中四项研究证明了 PFPT(低能量和中等能量射频、超声波、低能量激光治疗、骶骨旁刺激、窍门法和盆底肌锻炼)的影响,13 项研究讨论了非侵入性方式(射频、多极射频和脉冲电流)的影响、多极射频与脉冲电磁相结合、射频与脉冲电磁场相结合、高强度聚焦超声、二氧化碳激光、多极射频与混合点阵激光相结合、微聚焦超声和 VIVEVE 表面冷却射频)对阴道松弛的影响。结论本综述指出了许多必须尝试的知识领域,以了解非加强型物理疗法和非侵入性方法对阴道松弛的影响。除了这些影响背后的机制之外。此外,我们强烈建议需要更多方法学和干预质量高的临床试验来研究各种物理治疗方法的疗效,包括电刺激、生物反馈发力、穴位按摩、手法治疗、神经调节、核心运动疗法、水疗法、精心设计的超声波治疗方案和阴道负重训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信