Validation of the SCOFF as a Simple Screening Tool for Eating Disorders in an Inpatient Sample Before and During COVID-19

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Clara Sophie Beer, Luisa Marie Lüken, Jessica Eggendorf, Martin Holtmann, Tanja Legenbauer
{"title":"Validation of the SCOFF as a Simple Screening Tool for Eating Disorders in an Inpatient Sample Before and During COVID-19","authors":"Clara Sophie Beer,&nbsp;Luisa Marie Lüken,&nbsp;Jessica Eggendorf,&nbsp;Martin Holtmann,&nbsp;Tanja Legenbauer","doi":"10.1002/eat.24318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Eating disorders (EDs) represent a significant public health concern, with a high prevalence among adolescent girls. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a marked increase in EDs, underlining the need for a brief screening tool in clinical settings. The present study compared ICD-10-based ED-diagnoses with SCOFF-identified at-risk female patients in a clinical setting and assessed the tool's reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Routine data (<i>n</i> = 955 participants) from a child and adolescent psychiatric hospital were evaluated regarding the incidence of ED-diagnoses before (<i>n</i> = 312) and during the pandemic (<i>n</i> = 643) and compared with SCOFF results. The SCOFF's sensitivity and specificity were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ED-diagnoses significantly increased, almost doubling from before to during the pandemic. The number of at-risk patients identified by the SCOFF likewise differed between the two time points. The SCOFF showed high sensitivity at cut-offs of 2 (pre-pandemic) and 3 (peri-pandemic) but low specificity. Internal consistency was poor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings align with previous research indicating an elevated rate of admission to clinical care for ED-diagnoses during the pandemic, a trend also reflected in the SCOFF results. However, the SCOFF's low specificity and poor internal consistency raise concerns about its applicability among adolescent psychiatric inpatients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 1","pages":"243-247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Eating disorders (EDs) represent a significant public health concern, with a high prevalence among adolescent girls. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a marked increase in EDs, underlining the need for a brief screening tool in clinical settings. The present study compared ICD-10-based ED-diagnoses with SCOFF-identified at-risk female patients in a clinical setting and assessed the tool's reliability.

Method

Routine data (n = 955 participants) from a child and adolescent psychiatric hospital were evaluated regarding the incidence of ED-diagnoses before (n = 312) and during the pandemic (n = 643) and compared with SCOFF results. The SCOFF's sensitivity and specificity were examined.

Results

ED-diagnoses significantly increased, almost doubling from before to during the pandemic. The number of at-risk patients identified by the SCOFF likewise differed between the two time points. The SCOFF showed high sensitivity at cut-offs of 2 (pre-pandemic) and 3 (peri-pandemic) but low specificity. Internal consistency was poor.

Discussion

The findings align with previous research indicating an elevated rate of admission to clinical care for ED-diagnoses during the pandemic, a trend also reflected in the SCOFF results. However, the SCOFF's low specificity and poor internal consistency raise concerns about its applicability among adolescent psychiatric inpatients.

Abstract Image

在 COVID-19 之前和期间,在住院病人样本中验证 SCOFF 作为饮食失调症简易筛查工具的有效性。
目的:进食障碍(ED)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在青春期少女中发病率很高。COVID-19 的流行导致了 ED 的显著增加,这凸显了在临床环境中对简短筛查工具的需求。本研究比较了基于 ICD-10 的 ED 诊断和 SCOFF 在临床环境中识别出的高危女性患者,并评估了该工具的可靠性:方法:对一家儿童和青少年精神病医院的常规数据(n = 955 名参与者)进行评估,了解大流行前(n = 312)和大流行期间(n = 643)的急诊室诊断发生率,并将其与 SCOFF 的结果进行比较。对 SCOFF 的灵敏度和特异性进行了研究:结果:急诊室诊断率大幅上升,从大流行前到大流行期间几乎翻了一番。通过 SCOFF 确定的高危患者人数在两个时间点之间同样存在差异。SCOFF 在截断值为 2(大流行前)和 3(大流行期间)时显示出较高的灵敏度,但特异性较低。内部一致性较差:讨论:研究结果与之前的研究结果一致,表明大流行期间因急诊室诊断而入院接受临床治疗的比例上升,这一趋势也反映在 SCOFF 的结果中。但是,SCOFF 的特异性低和内部一致性差,令人担忧其是否适用于青少年精神病住院患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信