Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programmes for neonates, infants and children in non-Asian low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Keerthana Rajanbabu, Deepashree Joshi B, Vidya Ramkumar, Hannah Kuper, Ramya Vaidyanath
{"title":"Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programmes for neonates, infants and children in non-Asian low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Keerthana Rajanbabu, Deepashree Joshi B, Vidya Ramkumar, Hannah Kuper, Ramya Vaidyanath","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes were established to reduce the impact of hearing loss on children. High-income countries (HICs) have resources and knowledge to execute these programmes. However, financial and other resource constraints limit the availability of these programmes to low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, LMICs have explored strategies to implement EHDI programmes in their context; the outcomes are still largely unknown.The aim of this study is to identify the various models of the EHDI program implemented in non-Asian LMICs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>METHOD: Studies published between 2010 and 2023 reporting EHDI programmes in non-Asian LMICs for children were considered. The primary databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOHost, EBSCO-CINAHL and ProQuest dissertations. The search results are summarised using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses chart. Quality appraisal and risk-of-bias assessment were assessed. Using the retrieved data, a narrative synthesis of the identified methods and forest plots for the prevalence estimate was created.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six studies from 16 LMICs were included. They were grouped into 29 hearing screening programmes for neonates and infants and 26 programmes for older children. Predominantly hospital-based screening was employed for neonates and infants and school-based screening for older children. Two-stage otoacoustic emissions screening was employed for neonates and infants, while single-stage pure tone audiometry with otoscopy screening was used for older children. Predominantly, audiologists performed screening and diagnostics for neonates/infants while community health workers performed screening for the older children. Screening aspects were reported predominantly and not diagnostic evaluation/intervention outcomes. Overall, the economics of EHDI was reported only anecdotally in a few studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The screening strategies were not uniform among non-Asian LMICs. The protocols used were similar to HICs, yet few developed protocols adapting the Joint Committee of Infant Hearing. However, long-term outcomes such as rate of identification, suitable intervention and their outcomes are not known. EHDI programmes with successful outcomes of early intervention must be studied and reported with economic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes were established to reduce the impact of hearing loss on children. High-income countries (HICs) have resources and knowledge to execute these programmes. However, financial and other resource constraints limit the availability of these programmes to low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, LMICs have explored strategies to implement EHDI programmes in their context; the outcomes are still largely unknown.The aim of this study is to identify the various models of the EHDI program implemented in non-Asian LMICs.

Aim: METHOD: Studies published between 2010 and 2023 reporting EHDI programmes in non-Asian LMICs for children were considered. The primary databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOHost, EBSCO-CINAHL and ProQuest dissertations. The search results are summarised using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses chart. Quality appraisal and risk-of-bias assessment were assessed. Using the retrieved data, a narrative synthesis of the identified methods and forest plots for the prevalence estimate was created.

Results: Fifty-six studies from 16 LMICs were included. They were grouped into 29 hearing screening programmes for neonates and infants and 26 programmes for older children. Predominantly hospital-based screening was employed for neonates and infants and school-based screening for older children. Two-stage otoacoustic emissions screening was employed for neonates and infants, while single-stage pure tone audiometry with otoscopy screening was used for older children. Predominantly, audiologists performed screening and diagnostics for neonates/infants while community health workers performed screening for the older children. Screening aspects were reported predominantly and not diagnostic evaluation/intervention outcomes. Overall, the economics of EHDI was reported only anecdotally in a few studies.

Conclusion: The screening strategies were not uniform among non-Asian LMICs. The protocols used were similar to HICs, yet few developed protocols adapting the Joint Committee of Infant Hearing. However, long-term outcomes such as rate of identification, suitable intervention and their outcomes are not known. EHDI programmes with successful outcomes of early intervention must be studied and reported with economic evaluations.

非亚洲低收入和中等收入国家的新生儿、婴儿和儿童早期听力检测和干预计划:系统综述。
导言:制定早期听力检测和干预计划(EHDI)是为了减少听力损失对儿童的影响。高收入国家(HICs)拥有实施这些计划的资源和知识。然而,由于财政和其他资源方面的限制,低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)无法实施这些计划。本研究旨在确定在非亚洲低收入与中等收入国家(LMICs)实施的电子健康发展指数(EHDI)计划的各种模式。目的:方法:研究考虑了 2010 年至 2023 年间发表的、报道非亚洲低收入与中等收入国家(LMICs)儿童电子健康发展指数计划的研究。检索的主要数据库包括 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、EBSCOHost、EBSCO-CINAHL 和 ProQuest dissertations。搜索结果采用《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》图表进行总结。对质量评价和偏倚风险进行了评估。利用检索到的数据,对已确定的方法进行了叙述性综合,并绘制了流行率估计的森林图:结果:纳入了来自 16 个低收入和中等收入国家的 56 项研究。这些研究分为 29 项针对新生儿和婴儿的听力筛查计划和 26 项针对较大儿童的听力筛查计划。新生儿和婴儿主要在医院进行听力筛查,年龄较大的儿童则在学校进行听力筛查。新生儿和婴儿采用两阶段耳声发射筛查,而较大儿童则采用单阶段纯音测听和耳镜筛查。主要由听力学家对新生儿/婴儿进行筛查和诊断,而社区卫生工作者则对年龄较大的儿童进行筛查。报告的主要是筛查结果,而不是诊断评估/干预结果。总体而言,只有少数研究报告了 EHDI 的经济效益:结论:非亚洲低收入与中等收入国家的筛查策略不尽相同。所使用的方案与高收入国家相似,但很少有国家制定了适应婴儿听力联合委员会的方案。然而,长期结果,如识别率、合适的干预及其结果尚不清楚。必须对早期干预取得成功结果的婴儿听力发育指数计划进行研究,并报告经济评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信