A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
{"title":"A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer awareness and screening among individuals with intellectual disabilities face unique challenges. To bridge this gap, educational interventions have been developed.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This review comprehensively analyzes educational interventions aimed at enhancing cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). It addresses key questions regarding intervention types and effectiveness, influencing factors, and recommendations for impactful programs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><div>A robust search strategy was deployed across reputable databases yielding 2512 articles. After meticulous screening and eligibility assessments, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing qualitative research, a feasibility study, and randomized control trials.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>The studies employed diverse interventions and assessment methods, leading to varying outcomes. Interventions included educational materials, communication packs, health education DVDs, and healthcare professional support, typically delivered over a short period with limited follow-up. Assessment methods comprised surveys, interviews, and knowledge surveys. However, a comprehensive evaluation of knowledge gains and screening uptake was often absent. While some studies reported modest increases in knowledge, none measured actual screening uptake and long-term effects. The strengths and limitations of these studies underscore the need for more comprehensive research in this area, considering factors such as sample size, study design, and long-term impact.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into educational interventions for cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities. Its comprehensive methodology and findings underscore the significance of tailoring interventions, extending their duration, and involving caregivers to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer awareness and screening among individuals with intellectual disabilities face unique challenges. To bridge this gap, educational interventions have been developed.

Aims

This review comprehensively analyzes educational interventions aimed at enhancing cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). It addresses key questions regarding intervention types and effectiveness, influencing factors, and recommendations for impactful programs.

Methods and procedures

A robust search strategy was deployed across reputable databases yielding 2512 articles. After meticulous screening and eligibility assessments, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing qualitative research, a feasibility study, and randomized control trials.

Outcomes and results

The studies employed diverse interventions and assessment methods, leading to varying outcomes. Interventions included educational materials, communication packs, health education DVDs, and healthcare professional support, typically delivered over a short period with limited follow-up. Assessment methods comprised surveys, interviews, and knowledge surveys. However, a comprehensive evaluation of knowledge gains and screening uptake was often absent. While some studies reported modest increases in knowledge, none measured actual screening uptake and long-term effects. The strengths and limitations of these studies underscore the need for more comprehensive research in this area, considering factors such as sample size, study design, and long-term impact.

Conclusion and implications

In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into educational interventions for cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities. Its comprehensive methodology and findings underscore the significance of tailoring interventions, extending their duration, and involving caregivers to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.
对提高智障人士癌症意识和筛查的教育干预措施进行系统回顾:混合方法。
背景:智障人士对癌症的认识和筛查面临着独特的挑战。目的:本综述全面分析了旨在提高智障人士(IDs)癌症意识的教育干预措施。综述探讨了有关干预类型和效果、影响因素的关键问题,并就有影响力的项目提出了建议:在知名数据库中采用了强大的搜索策略,共搜索到 2512 篇文章。经过细致的筛选和资格评估,8 项研究符合纳入标准,其中包括定性研究、可行性研究和随机对照试验:这些研究采用了不同的干预措施和评估方法,导致了不同的结果。干预措施包括教育材料、交流包、健康教育 DVD 和医护人员支持,通常在短期内实施,后续跟踪有限。评估方法包括调查、访谈和知识调查。但是,往往缺乏对知识增长和筛查接受度的全面评估。虽然一些研究报告了知识的适度增长,但没有一项研究对筛查的实际接受率和长期效果进行衡量。这些研究的优势和局限性突出表明,有必要在这一领域开展更全面的研究,同时考虑样本量、研究设计和长期影响等因素:总之,本综述为智障人士认识癌症的教育干预提供了宝贵的见解。其全面的方法论和研究结果强调了量身定制干预措施、延长干预措施的持续时间以及让护理人员参与其中以优化这一弱势群体的治疗效果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信