Ungrading: Revolution or evolution

IF 5 1区文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS

Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101149

Deborah Crusan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ungrading, an assessment approach transcending traditional grading methods, has surged in recognition partly due to recognition of disparities in educational systems during COVID. These injustices challenged people of color and English learners. While advocates highlight ungrading’s potential to enhance equity and student engagement, critics underline concerns about power dynamics, increased time commitments, and communication challenges.

查看原文本刊更多论文

取消评级：革命还是进化

不计分是一种超越传统评分方法的评估方法，它之所以得到广泛认可，部分原因是在 COVID 期间，人们认识到了教育系统中存在的不公平现象。这些不公正现象对有色人种和英语学习者提出了挑战。虽然倡导者强调了取消评分在提高公平性和学生参与度方面的潜力，但批评者也强调了对权力动态、时间投入增加和沟通挑战的担忧。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Second Language Writing LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

8.80

自引率

13.10%

发文量

审稿时长

59 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.