Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate-An Alternative in Times of Ciprofloxacin Obsolescence and Fosfomycin Limitation?

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Philipp J Spachmann, Sophie E Fischer, Christopher Goßler, Stefan Denzinger, Maximilian Burger, Johannes Breyer, Wolfgang Otto, Marco J Schnabel, Johannes Bründl, Bernd Rosenhammer
{"title":"Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate-An Alternative in Times of Ciprofloxacin Obsolescence and Fosfomycin Limitation?","authors":"Philipp J Spachmann, Sophie E Fischer, Christopher Goßler, Stefan Denzinger, Maximilian Burger, Johannes Breyer, Wolfgang Otto, Marco J Schnabel, Johannes Bründl, Bernd Rosenhammer","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13100940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, the German Federal Institute for Medicines and Medical Products restricted the use of fosfomycin in transrectal biopsy of the prostate (TRBP). Accordingly, the need for other antibiotic agents for prophylaxis in TRBP is urgent since antibiotic prophylaxis is mandatory in accordance with these guidelines. After the restriction of the use of ciprofloxacin, and before the use of fosfomycin in Germany was falsely allowed, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was evaluated as an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Regarding hospitalization for post-interventional infections, 359 patients at the Department of Urology of the University of Regensburg, at Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center as a single center, underwent TRBP between 2 July 2019 and 30 June 2020. Regarding antibiotic prophylaxis, the post-interventional hospitalization rate due to bacterial complications was relevant. Of the 359 patients, 10 (2.8%) had an infection requiring hospitalization post-TRBP. A total of 349 (97.2%) patients had no infection-related hospitalization. This corresponds to an incidence rate of only 2.8%. Referring to the previous infection rates under the now obsolete ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid can show a similar, if not tendentially even lower, risk of infection, and so this substance can be an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Another advantage is that, according to the WHO's AWaRe classification, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is one of the so-called Access antibiotics. This study is limited as rectal swabs and urine cultures were not performed on every patient before TRBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the German Federal Institute for Medicines and Medical Products restricted the use of fosfomycin in transrectal biopsy of the prostate (TRBP). Accordingly, the need for other antibiotic agents for prophylaxis in TRBP is urgent since antibiotic prophylaxis is mandatory in accordance with these guidelines. After the restriction of the use of ciprofloxacin, and before the use of fosfomycin in Germany was falsely allowed, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was evaluated as an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Regarding hospitalization for post-interventional infections, 359 patients at the Department of Urology of the University of Regensburg, at Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center as a single center, underwent TRBP between 2 July 2019 and 30 June 2020. Regarding antibiotic prophylaxis, the post-interventional hospitalization rate due to bacterial complications was relevant. Of the 359 patients, 10 (2.8%) had an infection requiring hospitalization post-TRBP. A total of 349 (97.2%) patients had no infection-related hospitalization. This corresponds to an incidence rate of only 2.8%. Referring to the previous infection rates under the now obsolete ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid can show a similar, if not tendentially even lower, risk of infection, and so this substance can be an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Another advantage is that, according to the WHO's AWaRe classification, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is one of the so-called Access antibiotics. This study is limited as rectal swabs and urine cultures were not performed on every patient before TRBP.

经直肠前列腺活检中的阿莫西林/克拉维酸--环丙沙星过时和磷霉素受限时代的替代品?
最近,德国联邦药品和医疗产品研究所限制在经直肠前列腺活检(TRBP)中使用磷霉素。因此,TRBP 急需其他抗生素药物进行预防,因为根据这些指南,必须使用抗生素进行预防。在环丙沙星的使用受到限制后,以及德国错误地允许使用磷霉素之前,阿莫西林/克拉维酸被评估为 TRBP 抗生素预防的替代药物。关于介入治疗后感染的住院治疗,雷根斯堡大学泌尿学系的 359 名患者在 2019 年 7 月 2 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间接受了 TRBP 治疗。关于抗生素预防,介入后因细菌并发症住院的比例与此相关。在359名患者中,有10人(2.8%)在TRBP术后发生感染,需要住院治疗。共有 349 名患者(97.2%)没有因感染而住院。这相当于感染率仅为 2.8%。参照以前使用现已过时的环丙沙星时的感染率,阿莫西林/克拉维酸的感染风险与环丙沙星相似,甚至更低,因此该药物可作为 TRBP 抗生素预防的替代药物。另一个优点是,根据世界卫生组织的 AWaRe 分类,阿莫西林/克拉维酸属于所谓的 "准入抗生素"。本研究存在局限性,因为在 TRBP 之前并没有对每位患者进行直肠拭子和尿液培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信