Measurement Instruments When Comparing Academic Performance and Physical Activity: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fan Zhang, Heather Erwin, Aaron Beighle
{"title":"Measurement Instruments When Comparing Academic Performance and Physical Activity: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.","authors":"Fan Zhang, Heather Erwin, Aaron Beighle","doi":"10.1111/josh.13521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study offers a comprehensive review of academic performance measurement instruments in physical activity and education settings, aiming to provide a comprehensive list of tools used for measuring academic performance in relation to variables associated with physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic performance outcomes, including cognitive skills, attitudes, academic achievement, and academic behavior categorized by CDC, were investigated using specific keywords in search engines between 2000 and June 2022, with 233 articles (describing 220 studies) included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant demographics, mainly elementary students, displayed variability. The review found that 37.3% of studies measured cognitive skills and attitudes (primarily attention), 57.3% assessed academic achievement (GPA, subject scores, or standardized tests), and 15.9% evaluated academic behaviors (mostly on-task/off-task behaviors). Various instruments were employed, notably those measuring attention, intelligence, memory, and attitude. Positive associations were found in 63.4%, 78.6%, and 85.7% of studies for cognitive skills, academic achievement, and academic behavior, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This literature review highlights the prevalence of studies on academic achievement, diverse cognitive skills instruments, and a focus on attention. Despite predominantly positive relationships, some studies reported non-significant or negative associations, particularly for cognitive skills. Future research should emphasize these areas using reliable instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study offers a comprehensive review of academic performance measurement instruments in physical activity and education settings, aiming to provide a comprehensive list of tools used for measuring academic performance in relation to variables associated with physical activity.

Methods: Academic performance outcomes, including cognitive skills, attitudes, academic achievement, and academic behavior categorized by CDC, were investigated using specific keywords in search engines between 2000 and June 2022, with 233 articles (describing 220 studies) included.

Results: Participant demographics, mainly elementary students, displayed variability. The review found that 37.3% of studies measured cognitive skills and attitudes (primarily attention), 57.3% assessed academic achievement (GPA, subject scores, or standardized tests), and 15.9% evaluated academic behaviors (mostly on-task/off-task behaviors). Various instruments were employed, notably those measuring attention, intelligence, memory, and attitude. Positive associations were found in 63.4%, 78.6%, and 85.7% of studies for cognitive skills, academic achievement, and academic behavior, respectively.

Conclusion: This literature review highlights the prevalence of studies on academic achievement, diverse cognitive skills instruments, and a focus on attention. Despite predominantly positive relationships, some studies reported non-significant or negative associations, particularly for cognitive skills. Future research should emphasize these areas using reliable instruments.

比较学习成绩和体育锻炼时的测量工具:全面系统综述》。
研究背景本研究对体育活动和教育环境中的学业成绩测量工具进行了全面回顾,旨在提供一份与体育活动相关变量有关的学业成绩测量工具的综合清单:在 2000 年至 2022 年 6 月期间,使用搜索引擎中的特定关键词对学业成绩结果(包括认知技能、态度、学业成绩和按疾病预防控制中心分类的学业行为)进行了调查,共纳入 233 篇文章(描述了 220 项研究):参与者的人口统计学特征(主要是小学生)显示出差异性。综述发现,37.3%的研究测量了认知技能和态度(主要是注意力),57.3%的研究评估了学业成绩(GPA、学科成绩或标准化测试),15.9%的研究评估了学业行为(主要是任务内/任务外行为)。研究采用了多种工具,主要是测量注意力、智力、记忆力和态度的工具。分别有 63.4%、78.6% 和 85.7%的研究发现,认知技能、学习成绩和学习行为之间存在正相关:本文献综述强调了关于学习成绩、各种认知技能工具和注意力的研究的普遍性。尽管主要存在正相关关系,但一些研究报告了非显著或负相关关系,尤其是认知技能方面。未来的研究应使用可靠的工具强调这些领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信