Zhaoxiang Wang, Fengyan Tang, Bo Zhao, Han Yan, Xuejing Shao, Qichao Yang
{"title":"Composite dietary antioxidant index and abdominal aortic calcification: a national cross-sectional study.","authors":"Zhaoxiang Wang, Fengyan Tang, Bo Zhao, Han Yan, Xuejing Shao, Qichao Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12937-024-01029-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index (CDAI) is a novel, inclusive measure for evaluating the antioxidant potential of diets. We aim to explore the link between the CDAI and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) in U.S. adults aged ≥ 40 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study collected dietary and AAC data for individuals aged ≥ 40 years from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. The CDAI was calculated using six dietary antioxidants. AAC was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring system known as AAC-24, with an AAC score greater than 6 as severe AAC (SAAC). To examine the association between CDAI and AAC, including SAAC, liner/logistic regression analyses and smooth curve fitting were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,640 participants were included in this study, and significant decreases in AAC score and SAAC prevalence were observed with ascending CDAI levels (P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors, a clear link was established between the CDAI and both AAC score (β = -0.083, 95% CI -0.144-0.022, P = 0.008) and SAAC (OR = 0.883, 95% CI 0.806-0.968, P = 0.008), respectively. Further smooth curve fitting indicated a negative correlation between CDAI and both AAC score and SAAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dietary antioxidant consumption, as quantified by the CDAI, shows an inverse relationship with AAC risk. Additional longitudinal and intervention studies are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-01029-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index (CDAI) is a novel, inclusive measure for evaluating the antioxidant potential of diets. We aim to explore the link between the CDAI and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) in U.S. adults aged ≥ 40 years.
Methods: This cross-sectional study collected dietary and AAC data for individuals aged ≥ 40 years from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. The CDAI was calculated using six dietary antioxidants. AAC was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring system known as AAC-24, with an AAC score greater than 6 as severe AAC (SAAC). To examine the association between CDAI and AAC, including SAAC, liner/logistic regression analyses and smooth curve fitting were applied.
Results: A total of 2,640 participants were included in this study, and significant decreases in AAC score and SAAC prevalence were observed with ascending CDAI levels (P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors, a clear link was established between the CDAI and both AAC score (β = -0.083, 95% CI -0.144-0.022, P = 0.008) and SAAC (OR = 0.883, 95% CI 0.806-0.968, P = 0.008), respectively. Further smooth curve fitting indicated a negative correlation between CDAI and both AAC score and SAAC.
Conclusions: Dietary antioxidant consumption, as quantified by the CDAI, shows an inverse relationship with AAC risk. Additional longitudinal and intervention studies are essential.
期刊介绍：
Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered.
Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies.
In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
