Francis Julian L Graham, Salomeh Keyhani, Pamela Ling, Vira Pravosud, Nhung Nguyen, Deborah Hasin, Beth E Cohen
{"title":"Changes in Sources of Information about the Risks and Benefits of Cannabis in a National Cohort of US Adults from 2017 - 2021.","authors":"Francis Julian L Graham, Salomeh Keyhani, Pamela Ling, Vira Pravosud, Nhung Nguyen, Deborah Hasin, Beth E Cohen","doi":"10.15288/jsad.24-00108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As more states legalize cannabis in the US, marketing from the cannabis industry and news coverage of cannabis have increased. Sources of information on cannabis can influence beliefs about risks and benefits. Yet, little is known about how the use and influence of specific sources of information have changed over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal study of 5053 US adults between 2017 and 2021. Participants were asked about sources of information on cannabis risks and benefits and which sources were most influential using a web-based survey at three different time points (2017, 2020, 2021). We evaluated changes in the use/influence of multiple sources of information from 2017 to 2021 and examined interactions with age, cannabis use and state cannabis legal status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest increases in sources of information on cannabis benefits and risks were in use of health professionals (+5.5% for benefits and +17.4% for risks). The largest declines were in use of traditional media (TV, radio, newspapers) (-12.3% and -11.4%). Use of cannabis advertisements and dispensaries/other industry sources also significantly increased. Health professionals were the most influential source of information in all three waves regardless of age, cannabis use or state legal status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants sought information from different sources, and increasingly relied on health professionals as a primary source, highlighting the need to train healthcare providers about cannabis risks and benefits. While fewer people used traditional media, use of industry sources increased, underscoring the need for accurate cannabis information sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: As more states legalize cannabis in the US, marketing from the cannabis industry and news coverage of cannabis have increased. Sources of information on cannabis can influence beliefs about risks and benefits. Yet, little is known about how the use and influence of specific sources of information have changed over time.
Method: We conducted a longitudinal study of 5053 US adults between 2017 and 2021. Participants were asked about sources of information on cannabis risks and benefits and which sources were most influential using a web-based survey at three different time points (2017, 2020, 2021). We evaluated changes in the use/influence of multiple sources of information from 2017 to 2021 and examined interactions with age, cannabis use and state cannabis legal status.
Results: The largest increases in sources of information on cannabis benefits and risks were in use of health professionals (+5.5% for benefits and +17.4% for risks). The largest declines were in use of traditional media (TV, radio, newspapers) (-12.3% and -11.4%). Use of cannabis advertisements and dispensaries/other industry sources also significantly increased. Health professionals were the most influential source of information in all three waves regardless of age, cannabis use or state legal status.
Conclusions: Participants sought information from different sources, and increasingly relied on health professionals as a primary source, highlighting the need to train healthcare providers about cannabis risks and benefits. While fewer people used traditional media, use of industry sources increased, underscoring the need for accurate cannabis information sources.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
