Developing a Screening Strategy to Identify Hepatotoxicity and Drug Interaction Potential of Botanicals.

IF 2.3 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Journal of Dietary Supplements Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1080/19390211.2024.2417679
Amy L Roe, Julie Krzykwa, Angela I Calderón, Cécile Bascoul, Bill J Gurley, Igor Koturbash, Albert P Li, Yitong Liu, Constance A Mitchell, Hellen Oketch-Rabah, Lin Si, Richard B van Breemen, Heather Walker, Stephen S Ferguson
{"title":"Developing a Screening Strategy to Identify Hepatotoxicity and Drug Interaction Potential of Botanicals.","authors":"Amy L Roe, Julie Krzykwa, Angela I Calderón, Cécile Bascoul, Bill J Gurley, Igor Koturbash, Albert P Li, Yitong Liu, Constance A Mitchell, Hellen Oketch-Rabah, Lin Si, Richard B van Breemen, Heather Walker, Stephen S Ferguson","doi":"10.1080/19390211.2024.2417679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Botanical supplements, herbal remedies, and plant-derived products are used globally. However, botanical dietary supplements are rarely subjected to robust safety testing unless there are adverse reports in post-market surveillance. Botanicals are complex and difficult to assess using current frameworks designed for single constituent substances (e.g. small molecules or discrete chemicals), making safety assessments costly and time-consuming. The liver is a primary organ of concern for potential botanical-induced hepatotoxicity and botanical-drug interactions as it plays a crucial role in xenobiotic metabolism. The NIH-funded Drug Induced Liver Injury Network noted that the number of botanical-induced liver injuries in 2017 nearly tripled from those observed in 2004-2005. New approach methodologies (NAMs) can aid in the rapid and cost-effective assessment of botanical supplements for potential hepatotoxicity. The Hepatotoxicity Working Group within the Botanical Safety Consortium is working to develop a screening strategy that can help reliably identify potential hepatotoxic botanicals and inform mechanisms of toxicity. This manuscript outlines the Hepatotoxicity Working Group's strategy and describes the assays selected and the rationale for the selection of botanicals used in case studies. The selected NAMs evaluated as a part of this effort are intended to be incorporated into a larger battery of assays to evaluate multiple endpoints related to botanical safety. This work will contribute to a botanical safety toolkit, providing researchers with tools to better understand hepatotoxicity associated with botanicals, prioritize and plan future testing as needed, and gain a deeper insight into the botanicals being tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":15646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","volume":" ","pages":"162-192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2024.2417679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botanical supplements, herbal remedies, and plant-derived products are used globally. However, botanical dietary supplements are rarely subjected to robust safety testing unless there are adverse reports in post-market surveillance. Botanicals are complex and difficult to assess using current frameworks designed for single constituent substances (e.g. small molecules or discrete chemicals), making safety assessments costly and time-consuming. The liver is a primary organ of concern for potential botanical-induced hepatotoxicity and botanical-drug interactions as it plays a crucial role in xenobiotic metabolism. The NIH-funded Drug Induced Liver Injury Network noted that the number of botanical-induced liver injuries in 2017 nearly tripled from those observed in 2004-2005. New approach methodologies (NAMs) can aid in the rapid and cost-effective assessment of botanical supplements for potential hepatotoxicity. The Hepatotoxicity Working Group within the Botanical Safety Consortium is working to develop a screening strategy that can help reliably identify potential hepatotoxic botanicals and inform mechanisms of toxicity. This manuscript outlines the Hepatotoxicity Working Group's strategy and describes the assays selected and the rationale for the selection of botanicals used in case studies. The selected NAMs evaluated as a part of this effort are intended to be incorporated into a larger battery of assays to evaluate multiple endpoints related to botanical safety. This work will contribute to a botanical safety toolkit, providing researchers with tools to better understand hepatotoxicity associated with botanicals, prioritize and plan future testing as needed, and gain a deeper insight into the botanicals being tested.

制定筛选策略以确定植物药的肝毒性和药物相互作用潜力
植物补充剂、草药疗法和植物衍生产品在全球广泛使用。然而,植物膳食补充剂很少接受严格的安全性测试,除非在上市后监测中出现不良报告。植物药成分复杂,难以用目前为单一成分物质(如小分子或离散化学品)设计的框架进行评估,因此安全评估成本高且耗时。由于肝脏在异生物代谢中起着至关重要的作用,因此肝脏是潜在植物药诱发肝毒性和植物药与药物相互作用的主要关注器官。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的药物诱发肝损伤网络指出,2017年植物药诱发肝损伤的数量比2004-2005年观察到的数量增加了近两倍。新方法(NAMs)可以帮助快速、经济高效地评估植物补充剂的潜在肝毒性。植物安全联盟的肝毒性工作组正在努力开发一种筛选策略,以帮助可靠地识别潜在的肝毒性植物药,并告知毒性机制。本手稿概述了肝毒性工作组的策略,介绍了所选的检测方法以及案例研究中所用植物药的选择理由。作为这项工作的一部分,所选的 NAMs 将被纳入一个更大的检测组合,以评估与植物药安全性相关的多个终点。这项工作将为植物药安全性工具包做出贡献,为研究人员提供更好地了解与植物药相关的肝毒性、根据需要确定优先次序和规划未来测试以及更深入地了解正在测试的植物药的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Journal of Dietary Supplements Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dietary Supplements (formerly the Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional & Medical Foods) has been retitled to reflect the bold departure from a traditional scientific journal presentation to a leading voice for anyone with a stake in dietary supplements. The journal addresses important issues that meet the broad range of interests from researchers, regulators, marketers, educators, and health professionals from academic, governmental, industry, healthcare, public health, and consumer education sectors. This vital tool not only presents scientific information but interprets it - helping you more readily pass it on to your students, patients, clients, or company.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信