The daily experience of hunger in UK females with and without food insecurity

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Courtney Neal , Gillian V. Pepper , Oliver M. Shannon , Caroline Allen , Melissa Bateson , Daniel Nettle
{"title":"The daily experience of hunger in UK females with and without food insecurity","authors":"Courtney Neal ,&nbsp;Gillian V. Pepper ,&nbsp;Oliver M. Shannon ,&nbsp;Caroline Allen ,&nbsp;Melissa Bateson ,&nbsp;Daniel Nettle","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food insecurity (FI) is associated with increased mortality risk, depression, and obesity in females in high-income countries, but causal mechanisms remain unclear. FI is often assumed to lead to increased levels of hunger. However, quantitative evidence describing daily experiences of hunger in FI is lacking. Our pre-registered study used ecological momentary assessment to capture experiences of hunger in two groups of UK-based females: those experiencing FI (N = 143) and those experiencing food security (FS; N = 149). Participants self-reported hunger hourly (0900–2100) for one week (Monday-Sunday). There was no difference between groups in mean hunger (<em>t</em>(290) = 0.17, <em>p =</em> .866, <em>d</em> = 0.02) nor within-day standard deviation in hunger (<em>t</em>(290) = 1.31, <em>p =</em> .193, <em>d</em> = 0.15). However, both quantities fluctuated more from day to day in the FI group. Compared to the FS group, participants in the FI group had a larger day-to-day variation in mean hunger (<em>t</em>(284) = 2.43, <em>p =</em> .016, <em>d</em> = 0.29) and a larger day-to-day variation in the within-day standard deviation of hunger (<em>t</em>(284) = 2.90, <em>p =</em> .004, <em>d</em> = 0.34). In exploratory analyses, we found that the hunger of the two groups patterned differently across the day. Our findings suggest that experiences of hunger are less stable in those experiencing FI, which may reflect associations between FI and greater uncertainty in food access, higher variability in meal timings or the increased likelihood of chaotic home and work lives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 107732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324005361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food insecurity (FI) is associated with increased mortality risk, depression, and obesity in females in high-income countries, but causal mechanisms remain unclear. FI is often assumed to lead to increased levels of hunger. However, quantitative evidence describing daily experiences of hunger in FI is lacking. Our pre-registered study used ecological momentary assessment to capture experiences of hunger in two groups of UK-based females: those experiencing FI (N = 143) and those experiencing food security (FS; N = 149). Participants self-reported hunger hourly (0900–2100) for one week (Monday-Sunday). There was no difference between groups in mean hunger (t(290) = 0.17, p = .866, d = 0.02) nor within-day standard deviation in hunger (t(290) = 1.31, p = .193, d = 0.15). However, both quantities fluctuated more from day to day in the FI group. Compared to the FS group, participants in the FI group had a larger day-to-day variation in mean hunger (t(284) = 2.43, p = .016, d = 0.29) and a larger day-to-day variation in the within-day standard deviation of hunger (t(284) = 2.90, p = .004, d = 0.34). In exploratory analyses, we found that the hunger of the two groups patterned differently across the day. Our findings suggest that experiences of hunger are less stable in those experiencing FI, which may reflect associations between FI and greater uncertainty in food access, higher variability in meal timings or the increased likelihood of chaotic home and work lives.
有和没有粮食不安全问题的英国女性的日常饥饿体验。
粮食不安全(FI)与高收入国家女性死亡风险增加、抑郁和肥胖有关,但其因果机制仍不清楚。人们通常认为,粮食不安全会导致饥饿程度增加。然而,描述 FI 中饥饿的日常体验的定量证据还很缺乏。我们的预先登记研究采用生态学瞬间评估来捕捉两组英国女性的饥饿体验:经历过食物中毒的女性(143 人)和经历过食物安全的女性(149 人)。参与者在一周内(周一至周日)每小时(9:00-21:00)自我报告一次饥饿感。组间饥饿感平均值(t(290) = 0.17,p = .866,d = 0.02)和饥饿感日内标准差(t(290) = 1.31,p = .193,d = 0.15)均无差异。然而,在 FI 组中,这两个量在不同天之间的波动更大。与FS组相比,FI组参与者的平均饥饿感的日变化较大(t(284) = 2.43,p = .016,d = 0.29),饥饿感日内标准差的日变化也较大(t(284) = 2.90,p = .004,d = 0.34)。在探索性分析中,我们发现两组人在一天中的饥饿感模式不同。我们的研究结果表明,经历 FI 的人的饥饿感不太稳定,这可能反映了 FI 与食物获取的不确定性更高、进餐时间的变化性更大或家庭和工作生活更加混乱之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信